Paper · 2005 · Zhongguo tangliao

Effect of Triphenyl-tin-acetate on Cercospora Leafspot of Sugarbeet

AI He-mai

3
claims
3
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

triphenyl-tin-acetate with watering 500 times was sprayed 2-3 times for control cercospora leafspot on sugarbeet, the trial results showed that the occurring leafspot disease index was reduced to 22.6-26.1, and the root yield and sugar content were increased to 8.1%-10.6%, 0.7-1.1°S, respectively.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sprayed triphenyl-tin-acetate reduced the sugarbeet leafspot disease index to 22.6-26.1.

Treatment
triphenyl-tin-acetate with watering 500 timese0
Interactor
cercosporaCercosporae0pathogen
Outcome
leafspot disease indexe0
Direction
reducede0
Value
22.6-26.1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Cercospora
Cercospora · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Howard F. Schwartz, Colorado State University, United States · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“triphenyl-tin-acetate with watering 500 times was sprayed 2-3 times for control cercospora leafspot on sugarbeet, the trial results showed that the occurring leafspot disease index was reduced to 22.6-26.1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–205 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spraying increased sugarbeet root yield by 8.1%-10.6%.

Treatment
triphenyl-tin-acetate with watering 500 timese0
Outcome
root yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
8.1%-10.6%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“triphenyl-tin-acetate with watering 500 times was sprayed 2-3 times for control cercospora leafspot on sugarbeet, the trial results showed that the occurring leafspot disease index was reduced to 22.6-26.1, and the root yield and sugar content were increased to 8.1%-10.6%, 0.7-1.1°S, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–297 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spraying increased sugar content by 0.7-1.1°S.

Treatment
triphenyl-tin-acetate with watering 500 timese0
Outcome
sugar contente0
Direction
increasede0
Value
0.7-1.1°Se0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“triphenyl-tin-acetate with watering 500 times was sprayed 2-3 times for control cercospora leafspot on sugarbeet, the trial results showed that the occurring leafspot disease index was reduced to 22.6-26.1, and the root yield and sugar content were increased to 8.1%-10.6%, 0.7-1.1°S, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–297 · show in text ↑

fentin acetate · Cercospora · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

fentin acetate · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

fentin acetate · quality: sugar starch · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

irrigation · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results differ

113 papers: 79 positive, 34 negative or no effect

78 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

109 papers more in this group

See all 113 papers →

irrigation · Cercospora · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

irrigation · quality: sugar starch · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

44 papers: 30 positive, 14 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

40 papers more in this group

See all 44 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.