Paper · 2016 · Plant Disease

Integrated Control of Apple Scab and Powdery Mildew in an Organic Apple Orchard by Combining Potassium Carbonates with Wettable Sulfur, Pruning, and Cultivar Susceptibility

Imre J. Holb; Stefan Kunz

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
34
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

In a 4-year study in a whole-field sanitized organic apple orchard, the effectiveness of nine fungicide treatments, including potassium mono- and bicarbonate and their combinations with wettable sulfur, were evaluated for scab and powdery mildew control on two cultivars with different susceptibility to scab and powdery mildew, under two pruning treatments. The whole-field sanitation practice was performed by removal of infected fallen leaves. Treatment effects on phytotoxicity and yield were also determined. Pruning significantly reduced leaf scab incidence but only on the more scab-susceptible Idared. Pruning significantly reduced mildew incidence in most years and on both cultivars but the more mildew-susceptible Jonathan showed significantly higher mildew incidence than Idared. Among products approved for organic production, the best scab control was achieved with a potassium mono- or bicarbonate treatment combined with wettable sulfur, except for Jonathan in 2011 on leaf and in 2014 on both leaf and fruit, and for Idared in 2013 on fruit. The best mildew control was also achieved with potassium mono- or bicarbonate treatments combined with wettable sulfur, with exceptions on shoots of Idared in 2011 and 2013 and on fruit of Idared in 2012. Leaf phytotoxicity was significantly higher in all potassium carbonate treatments compared with untreated plots, except for Idared in 2012, while fruit russet in these treatments did not differ significantly from the untreated plots. However, phytotoxicity values of all carbonate treatments were significantly lower than the lime sulfur treatment in most years on both cultivars. Yield of the potassium mono- or bicarbonate treatments combined with wettable sulfur was significantly higher than the untreated plots in the pruned treatments for both cultivars in all years. The integrated control approach designed for organic disease management against the two pathogens is discussed.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pruning significantly reduced leaf scab incidence in Idared.

Material
Idarede0
Treatment
Pruninge0
Interactor
Scabt0pathogen
Outcome
leaf scab incidencee0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pruning significantly reduced leaf scab incidence but only on the more scab-susceptible Idared.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 514–609 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple Scab”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–32 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pruning significantly reduced mildew incidence in most years on both cultivars.

Treatment
Pruninge0
Interactor
Powdery Mildewt0pathogen
Outcome
mildew incidencee0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
in most years and on both cultivarse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pruning significantly reduced mildew incidence in most years and on both cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 610–692 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple Scab and Powdery Mildew”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–51 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Jonathan had significantly higher mildew incidence than Idared.

Material
Jonathane0
Interactor
Powdery Mildewt0pathogen
Outcome
mildew incidencee0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
Idarede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the more mildew-susceptible Jonathan showed significantly higher mildew incidence than Idared.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 697–791 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple Scab and Powdery Mildew”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium mono- or bicarbonate with wettable sulfur gave the best scab control, with specified cultivar year organ exceptions.

Treatment
potassium mono- or bicarbonate treatment combined with wettable sulfure0
Interactor
Scabt0pathogen
Outcome
scab controle0
Direction
beste0
Qualifier
except for Jonathan in 2011 on leaf and in 2014 on both leaf and fruit, and for Idared in 2013 on fruite0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the best scab control was achieved with a potassium mono- or bicarbonate treatment combined with wettable sulfur, except for Jonathan in 2011 on leaf and in 2014 on both leaf and fruit, and for Idared in 2013 on fruit.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 840–1058 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple Scab”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–32 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium mono- or bicarbonate with wettable sulfur gave the best mildew control, with specified Idared exceptions.

Treatment
potassium mono- or bicarbonate treatments combined with wettable sulfure0
Interactor
Powdery Mildewt0pathogen
Outcome
mildew controle0
Direction
beste0
Qualifier
with exceptions on shoots of Idared in 2011 and 2013 and on fruit of Idared in 2012e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The best mildew control was also achieved with potassium mono- or bicarbonate treatments combined with wettable sulfur, with exceptions on shoots of Idared in 2011 and 2013 and on fruit of Idared in 2012.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1059–1263 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple Scab and Powdery Mildew”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium carbonate treatments generally caused significantly more leaf phytotoxicity than untreated plots.

Treatment
potassium carbonate treatmentse0
Outcome
Leaf phytotoxicitye0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
except for Idared in 2012e0
Comparator
untreated plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf phytotoxicity was significantly higher in all potassium carbonate treatments compared with untreated plots, except for Idared in 2012”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1264–1402 · show in text ↑
t0

“Organic Apple Orchard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit russet under potassium carbonate did not differ significantly from untreated plots.

Treatment
Potassium Carbonatest0
Outcome
fruit russete0
Direction
did not differe0
Comparator
untreated plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fruit russet in these treatments did not differ significantly from the untreated plots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1410–1497 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple Scab and Powdery Mildew in an Organic Apple Orchard by Combining Potassium Carbonates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Carbonate treatments caused significantly less phytotoxicity than lime sulfur in most years on both cultivars.

Treatment
carbonate treatmentse0
Outcome
phytotoxicity valuese0
Direction
lowere0
Qualifier
in most years on both cultivarse0
Comparator
lime sulfur treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“phytotoxicity values of all carbonate treatments were significantly lower than the lime sulfur treatment in most years on both cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1507–1644 · show in text ↑
t0

“Organic Apple Orchard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pruned trees receiving potassium mono- or bicarbonate with sulfur had significantly higher yield than untreated plots in both cultivars in all years.

Treatment
potassium mono- or bicarbonate treatments combined with wettable sulfure0
Outcome
Yielde0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
in the pruned treatments for both cultivars in all yearse0
Comparator
untreated plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yield of the potassium mono- or bicarbonate treatments combined with wettable sulfur was significantly higher than the untreated plots in the pruned treatments for both cultivars in all years.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1645–1837 · show in text ↑
t0

“Organic Apple Orchard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–79 · show in text ↑

sulfur atom · yield · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

11 papers: 7 positive, 4 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

sulfur atom · disease · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 19 positive, 1 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

hydrogencarbonate · disease · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

potassium · disease · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 6 positive, 3 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

pruning · disease · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 16 positive, 8 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

potassium · yield · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 20 positive, 6 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.