Abstract
To clarify the effect of different sowing dates on protein and its components contents in barley grain,10 different barley cultivars were planted under three different times in Shihezi area.The results showed that:the differences of grain protein contents was obvious under the different sowing dates.The effects of sowing date treatment,cultivars quality and the interaction between sowing date and cultivars on grain salted protein content were all insignificant.The main treatment of sowing date had remarkable effect on grain hordein content,but the effects of different cultivars and its interaction with main treatment appeared to be more obvious;Furthermore,sowing date treatment imposed remarkable effect on barley grain glutelin content.Stepwise regression analyses showed that:during the period of barley earring stage to mature stage,among many meteorological factors,mean maximum temperature per day,comparative difference of temperature each day,average relative humility each day were key meteorological factors to barley grain protein content.In terms of salted protein content,the key meteorological factors were comparative difference of temperature each day and mean sunshine time each day.But as for barley grain hordein content,the factors of mean minimum temperature each day,comparative difference of temperature each day and mean relative humility each day were the key factors.When it comes to barley grain glutelin content,the key factors belonged to comparative difference of temperature each day and mean relative humility each day.The results mentioned above indicated that external environment conditions might regulate barley grain protein and its components contents to a certain extent,so via selecting sowing date in practical production could controlling and regulating barley grain protein traits effectively.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 11
Claim · model-written summary
Grain protein content differed across sowing dates.
- Taxon
- barley
.jpg?width=60)
Hordeum vulgaret0 - Treatment
- different sowing datese0
- Outcome
- grain protein contentse0
- Direction
- differencese0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“differences of grain protein contents was obvious under the different sowing dates”
t0“Barley”
Claim · model-written summary
Sowing date had no significant effect on salted protein content.
- Taxon
- barleyHordeum vulgaret0
- Treatment
- sowing date treatmente0
- Outcome
- grain salted protein contente0
- Direction
- insignificante0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“effects of sowing date treatment,cultivars quality and the interaction between sowing date and cultivars on grain salted protein content were all insignificant”
t0“Barley”
Claim · model-written summary
Cultivar quality and its interaction with sowing date had insignificant effects on salted protein content.
- Taxon
- barleyHordeum vulgaret0
- Outcome
- grain salted protein contente0
- Qualifier
- all insignificante0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“effects of sowing date treatment,cultivars quality and the interaction between sowing date and cultivars on grain salted protein content were all insignificant”
t0“Barley”
Claim · model-written summary
Sowing date had a marked effect on hordein content.
- Taxon
- barleyHordeum vulgaret0
- Treatment
- sowing datee0
- Outcome
- grain hordein contente0
- Direction
- remarkable effecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“main treatment of sowing date had remarkable effect on grain hordein content”
t0“Barley”
Claim · model-written summary
Cultivar and its interaction with sowing date had more obvious effects on hordein than sowing date alone.
- Taxon
- barleyHordeum vulgaret0
- Qualifier
- more obviouse0
Not reportedOutcome
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“effects of different cultivars and its interaction with main treatment appeared to be more obvious”
t0“Barley”
Claim · model-written summary
Sowing date had a marked effect on glutelin content.
- Taxon
- barleyHordeum vulgaree0
- Treatment
- sowing date treatmente0
- Outcome
- barley grain glutelin contente0
- Direction
- remarkable effecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“sowing date treatment imposed remarkable effect on barley grain glutelin content”
t0“Barley”
Claim · model-written summary
Maximum daily temperature, daily temperature range and relative humidity were key weather factors for grain protein content.
- Taxon
- barleyHordeum vulgaret0
- Outcome
- barley grain protein contente0
- Setting
- mean maximum temperature per day,comparative difference of temperature each day,average relative humility each daye0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“mean maximum temperature per day,comparative difference of temperature each day,average relative humility each day were key meteorological factors to barley grain protein content”
t0“Barley”
Claim · model-written summary
Daily temperature range and sunshine time were key weather factors for salted protein content.
- Taxon
- barleyHordeum vulgaret0
- Setting
- comparative difference of temperature each day and mean sunshine time each daye0
Not reportedOutcomeDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“key meteorological factors were comparative difference of temperature each day and mean sunshine time each day”
t0“Barley”
Claim · model-written summary
Minimum daily temperature, daily temperature range and relative humidity were key factors for hordein content.
- Taxon
- barleyHordeum vulgaret0
- Setting
- mean minimum temperature each day,comparative difference of temperature each day and mean relative humility each daye0
Not reportedOutcomeDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“mean minimum temperature each day,comparative difference of temperature each day and mean relative humility each day were the key factors”
t0“Barley”
Claim · model-written summary
Daily temperature range and relative humidity were key factors for glutelin content.
- Taxon
- barleyHordeum vulgaret0
- Setting
- comparative difference of temperature each day and mean relative humility each daye0
Not reportedOutcomeDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“comparative difference of temperature each day and mean relative humility each day were the key factors”
t0“Barley”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors suggest selecting sowing date to regulate barley grain protein traits in production.
- Taxon
- barleyHordeum vulgaree0
- Outcome
- controlling and regulating barley grain protein traits effectivelye0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“via selecting sowing date in practical production could controlling and regulating barley grain protein traits effectively”
t0“Barley”
The same questions in other papers
sowing time · quality: protein · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
6 papers more in this group
See all 10 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.