Paper · 2017 · Iowa State University Digital Repository (Iowa State University)

Crown infection of corn by Diplodia zeae

George L. McNew

20
claims
40
verbatim quotes
10
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The symptoms of crown infection of corn caused by Diplodia zeae include: a dark straw-brown discoloration of the tissues of the crown and lower internodes; prevalence of subepidermal pycnidia on the crown and around the aerial adventitious roots; disintegration and shredding of the internal tissue of the crown; intense brown discoloration of the nodal plates, and a dark brown decay of the mesocotyl which results in the loss of the primary root system. Crown infection occurred on 14 to 52 percent of the field corn in central Iowa in the years from 1930 to 1933. Practically every corn plant grown from Diplodia-infected seed may show crown infection at maturity. Infected seedlings which, by means of timely establishment of adventitious roots, do not die may be parasitized during the remainder of the growing season. The symptoms on plants grown from disease-free seed in Diplodia-infested soil are identical with those derived from infected seed. The pathogene grows through the soil to the mesocotyl where it becomes established in the wounds created by the emerging seminal roots. The crown may be invaded directly from the soil at the point of emergence of an adventitious root but the crown is usually invaded from the decayed mesocotyl. The pathogene progresses up the mesocotyl from this primary lesion and becomes established on the crown. The mycelium spreads internally to a limited extent during the growing season and rapidly involves the entire crown and lower nodes at maturity. Although Diplodia zeae spreads from the mesocotyl upward for several nodes, it is not systemic in the plant. Under field conditions it is generally restricted to the first internode above the roots. Crown infection has been induced by infesting steamed soil with infected crowns and stalks of plants which had over-wintered under field conditions. Diplodia zeae may live in a soil devoid of plant refuse but its development is hampered in mixed culture. The presence of the pathogene in ordinary soil from a corn field has been demonstrated by growing plants from disease-free seed in such soil collected in the spring. Invasion of the crown from infested soil is most severe at high soil moisture contents, but the development of the infected plants is severely reduced at either high or low moisture contents. The dry weight of plants growing at optimum soil moisture content was not reduced by crown infection. The dry weight of roots is reduced more than that of the tops of plants grown in infested soil. The dry weight of the tops, however, is significantly less than that of non-infected plants grown under soil moisture conditions approaching the maximum or minimum for growth. A light infection of a plant growing at low soil moisture may be almost as injurious to the plant as a severe infection where there is an abundant supply of water. The transpiration ratio of infected plants is increased at soil moisture contents favorable to reduction in dry weight. Plants grown from Diplodia-infected seed treated with a mercury dust had a higher percentage of crown infection than similar plants from untreated seed. Treatment of disease-free seed with the same dust decreased the amount of crown infection of plants growing under field conditions. The dust apparently inhibited the fungus without killing it in the seed. Plants protected in this fashion later suffer crown infection. The extent of crown invasion under given conditions depends upon the time of initial infection. Seed treatment of disease-free seed may delay mesocotyl invasion from infested soil and thereby decrease crown infection. Selfed lines of corn have different reactions to crown infection by Diplodia zeae under field conditions and furnish some remarkably resistant lines for genetical studies. Late crown infection is a significant phase of the parasitism of Diplodia zeae on corn. The pathogene may reduce the dry weight of the plant to half that of a normal plant under certain soil moisture conditions. Under the most favorable field conditions there is a reduction in yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crown infection had discoloration, pycnidia, tissue disintegration, and mesocotyl decay.

Interactor
Diplodia zeaee0pathogen
Outcome
symptoms of crown infectione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The symptoms of crown infection of corn caused by Diplodia zeae include: a dark straw-brown discoloration of the tissues of the crown and lower internodes; prevalence of subepidermal pycnidia on the crown and around the aerial adventitious roots; disintegration and shredding of the internal tissue of the crown; intense brown discoloration of the nodal plates, and a dark brown decay of the mesocotyl which results in the loss of the primary root system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–454 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–23 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crown infection affected 14 to 52 percent of field corn in central Iowa during 1930–1933.

Outcome
Crown infectione0
Value
14 to 52 percente0
Setting
central Iowae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Crown infection occurred on 14 to 52 percent of the field corn in central Iowa in the years from 1930 to 1933”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 456–565 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–23 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Practically every corn plant from infected seed may show crown infection at maturity.

Organ / stage
maturitye0
Treatment
Diplodia-infected seede0
Outcome
crown infectione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Practically every corn plant grown from Diplodia-infected seed may show crown infection at maturity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 567–666 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–23 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Infected seedlings surviving through adventitious roots may remain parasitized through the growing season.

Organ / stage
seedlingse0
Outcome
parasitized during the remainder of the growing seasone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Infected seedlings which, by means of timely establishment of adventitious roots, do not die may be parasitized during the remainder of the growing season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 668–822 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–23 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plants from disease-free seed in infested soil showed symptoms identical to those from infected seed.

Treatment
Diplodia-infested soile0
Outcome
symptomse0
Direction
identicale0
Comparator
infected seede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The symptoms on plants grown from disease-free seed in Diplodia-infested soil are identical with those derived from infected seed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 824–953 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–23 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The pathogen grew through soil to the mesocotyl and established in wounds from emerging seminal roots.

Organ / stage
mesocotyle0
Outcome
established in the woundse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The pathogene grows through the soil to the mesocotyl where it becomes established in the wounds created by the emerging seminal roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 955–1089 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–23 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The crown was usually invaded from the decayed mesocotyl, though direct invasion from soil also occurred.

Organ / stage
crowne0
Outcome
crown is usually invaded from the decayed mesocotyle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The crown may be invaded directly from the soil at the point of emergence of an adventitious root but the crown is usually invaded from the decayed mesocotyl”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1091–1248 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–23 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycelium spread internally only to a limited extent during growth, then rapidly involved crown and lower nodes at maturity.

Organ / stage
crown and lower nodese0
Outcome
mycelium spreads internallye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The mycelium spreads internally to a limited extent during the growing season and rapidly involves the entire crown and lower nodes at maturity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1355–1498 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–23 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Diplodia spread several nodes upward but was not systemic, generally remaining below the first internode in the field.

Interactor
Diplodia zeaee0pathogen
Outcome
not systemic in the plante0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Although Diplodia zeae spreads from the mesocotyl upward for several nodes, it is not systemic in the plant. Under field conditions it is generally restricted to the first internode above the roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1500–1697 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–23 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Infesting steamed soil with overwintered infected crowns and stalks induced crown infection.

Treatment
infesting steamed soil with infected crowns and stalkse0
Outcome
Crown infectione0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Crown infection has been induced by infesting steamed soil with infected crowns and stalks of plants which had over-wintered under field conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1699–1846 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–23 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crown invasion from infested soil was most severe at high soil moisture.

Treatment
high soil moisture contentse0
Outcome
Invasion of the crowne0
Direction
most severee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Invasion of the crown from infested soil is most severe at high soil moisture contents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2120–2206 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–23 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Infected plant development was severely reduced at high or low soil moisture.

Treatment
high or low moisture contentse0
Outcome
development of the infected plantse0
Direction
severely reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the development of the infected plants is severely reduced at either high or low moisture contents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2212–2310 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–23 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At optimum moisture, crown infection did not reduce plant dry weight.

Treatment
crown infectione0
Outcome
dry weight of plantse0
Direction
not reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The dry weight of plants growing at optimum soil moisture content was not reduced by crown infection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2312–2412 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–23 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root dry weight was reduced more than top dry weight in infested soil.

Treatment
infested soile0
Outcome
dry weight of rootse0
Direction
reduced moree0
Comparator
topse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The dry weight of roots is reduced more than that of the tops of plants grown in infested soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2414–2508 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–23 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Top dry weight was significantly lower than in noninfected plants near growth moisture limits.

Outcome
dry weight of the topse0
Direction
less thane0
Comparator
non-infected plantse0

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The dry weight of the tops, however, is significantly less than that of non-infected plants grown under soil moisture conditions approaching the maximum or minimum for growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2510–2684 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–23 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Infection increased the transpiration ratio at soil moisture levels that reduced dry weight.

Treatment
infected plantse0
Outcome
transpiration ratioe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The transpiration ratio of infected plants is increased at soil moisture contents favorable to reduction in dry weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2850–2968 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–23 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mercury dust treatment of infected seed raised crown infection relative to untreated infected seed.

Treatment
mercury duste0
Outcome
percentage of crown infectione0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
untreated seede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plants grown from Diplodia-infected seed treated with a mercury dust had a higher percentage of crown infection than similar plants from untreated seed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2970–3121 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–23 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mercury dust treatment of disease-free seed decreased crown infection in field plants.

Treatment
same duste0
Outcome
amount of crown infectione0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment of disease-free seed with the same dust decreased the amount of crown infection of plants growing under field conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3123–3253 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–23 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Selfed corn lines differed in field reaction to crown infection and included resistant lines.

Material
Selfed lines of corne0
Interactor
Diplodia zeaee0pathogen
Outcome
different reactions to crown infectione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Selfed lines of corn have different reactions to crown infection by Diplodia zeae under field conditions and furnish some remarkably resistant lines for genetical studies”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3609–3779 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–23 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under favorable field conditions, crown infection reduced corn yield.

Outcome
yielde0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under the most favorable field conditions there is a reduction in yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3993–4064 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–23 · show in text ↑

mercury atom · molecular: metabolites · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

soil water · molecular: metabolites · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

infection · molecular: metabolites · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 9 positive, 12 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

infection · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

44 papers: 17 positive, 27 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

40 papers more in this group

See all 44 papers →

infection · physiology: gas exchange · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.