Paper · 1997 · Soil Science Society of America Journal

Optimizing Corn Production and Reducing Nitrate Losses with Water Table Control‐Subirrigation

C. F. Drury; C. S. Tan; J. D. Gaynor; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
34
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Water table control‐subiriggation (WTC) systems have increased crop production and improved water quality; however, the relationship between N management, water table depths, and corn production has not been well defined. We hypothesized that optimizing water table depth would increase corn ( Zea mays L.) growth, improve N fertilizer efficiency, and reduce NO ‐ 3 losses. A greenhouse incubation study with three water table depths (30, 60, and 80 cm) and four N rates (0, 0.7, 1.4, and 2.1 g N plant ‐1 ) was conducted using undisturbed soil columns (Fox sandy loam, Typic Hapludalf) planted to corn. The 30‐cm WTC treatment had the greatest NO ‐ 3 loss through tile drainage (715 µg N column ‐1 ). The 60‐cm WTC treatment reduced these losses by 54%. Nitrate losses through tile drainage were proportional to drainage volume, which followed the order 30 cm > 60 cm > 80 cm WTC. The 60‐cm WTC treatment increased crop yields (95 g plant ‐1 ) compared with the 30‐cm (68 g plant ‐1 ) and 80‐cm WTC (18 g plant ‐1 ) treatments at the optimal N rate of 1.4 g N plant ‐1 . After the first simulated rainfall event, N 2 O production was increased by 12.7 times with the 30‐cm WTC treatment (825 µg N column ‐1 d ‐1 ) compared with the 60‐ and 80‐cm WTC treatments. Water stress imposed by the 80‐cm WTC treatment limited crop growth, N uptake, leaching, and N 2 O emissions. However, up to 28% of added N (664 mg N column ‐1 ) remained in the soil after corn was harvested from the 80‐cm WTC treatment, which would be susceptible to leaching between cropping seasons.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 30-cm WTC treatment had the greatest drainage nitrate loss, 715 µg N column ‐1.

Treatment
30‐cm WTC treatmente0
Outcome
NO ‐ 3 loss through tile drainagee0
Direction
greateste0
Value
715 µg N column ‐1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The 30‐cm WTC treatment had the greatest NO ‐ 3 loss through tile drainage (715 µg N column ‐1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 613–709 · show in text ↑
e1

“planted to corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 596–611 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 60-cm WTC treatment reduced nitrate loss by 54% relative to 30 cm.

Treatment
60‐cm WTC treatmente0
Outcome
NO ‐ 3 loss through tile drainagee1
Direction
reducede0
Value
54%e0
Comparator
30‐cm WTC treatmente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The 60‐cm WTC treatment reduced these losses by 54%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–763 · show in text ↑
e1

“The 30‐cm WTC treatment had the greatest NO ‐ 3 loss through tile drainage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 613–687 · show in text ↑
e2

“planted to corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 596–611 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrate drainage loss tracked drainage volume in the order 30 > 60 > 80 cm WTC.

Treatment
30 cm > 60 cm > 80 cm WTCe0
Outcome
Nitrate losses through tile drainagee0
Qualifier
proportional to drainage volumee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrate losses through tile drainage were proportional to drainage volume, which followed the order 30 cm > 60 cm > 80 cm WTC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 764–889 · show in text ↑
e1

“planted to corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 596–611 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 1.4 g N plant-1, 60-cm WTC increased corn yield to 95 g plant-1, versus 68 and 18 g plant-1 at 30 and 80 cm.

Treatment
60‐cm WTC treatmente0
Outcome
crop yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
95 g plant ‐1e0
Qualifier
68 g plant ‐1e0
Comparator
30‐cme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The 60‐cm WTC treatment increased crop yields (95 g plant ‐1 ) compared with the 30‐cm (68 g plant ‐1 ) and 80‐cm WTC (18 g plant ‐1 ) treatments at the optimal N rate of 1.4 g N plant ‐1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 891–1078 · show in text ↑
e1

“corn ( Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 296–315 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After first simulated rain, 30-cm WTC increased N2O production 12.7-fold versus 60 and 80 cm.

Treatment
30‐cm WTC treatmente0
Outcome
N 2 O productione0
Direction
increasede0
Value
12.7 timese0
Qualifier
825 µg N column ‐1 d ‐1e0
Comparator
60‐ and 80‐cm WTC treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“After the first simulated rainfall event, N 2 O production was increased by 12.7 times with the 30‐cm WTC treatment (825 µg N column ‐1 d ‐1 ) compared with the 60‐ and 80‐cm WTC treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1081–1270 · show in text ↑
e1

“planted to corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 596–611 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress from 80-cm WTC limited crop growth and nitrogen uptake.

Treatment
80‐cm WTC treatmente0
Outcome
crop growth, N uptakee0
Direction
limitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Water stress imposed by the 80‐cm WTC treatment limited crop growth, N uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1272–1349 · show in text ↑
e1

“planted to corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 596–611 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress from 80-cm WTC limited leaching and N2O emissions.

Treatment
80‐cm WTC treatmente0
Outcome
leaching, and N 2 O emissionse0
Direction
limitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Water stress imposed by the 80‐cm WTC treatment limited crop growth, N uptake, leaching, and N 2 O emissions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1272–1380 · show in text ↑
e1

“planted to corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 596–611 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

As much as 28% of added N remained in soil after 80-cm WTC corn harvest.

Treatment
80‐cm WTC treatmente0
Outcome
remained in the soile0
Value
28%e0
Qualifier
664 mg N column ‐1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“up to 28% of added N (664 mg N column ‐1 ) remained in the soil after corn was harvested from the 80‐cm WTC treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1391–1508 · show in text ↑

soil water · molecular: metabolites · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

soil water · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

42 papers: 19 positive, 23 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

38 papers more in this group

See all 42 papers →

soil water · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

64 papers: 42 positive, 22 negative or no effect

41 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

60 papers more in this group

See all 64 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.