Paper · 2010 · Gansu Nongye Daxue xuebao

Dynamic effects of different LED light qualities on the growth and resveratrol synthetic in callus of Vitis vinifera

Liu Yuan

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Callus induced from the leaves of Vitis vinifera(cv.Pinot Noir)were used as materials for investigating the dynamic effects of different LED light qualities on the growth and resveratrol synthetic.The results showed that GLED was most conducive to the callus growth,but suppressed the resveratrol synthesis.BLED had no obvious effect on the callus growth;however,it had stronger promotion on content and production of resveratrol,while RLED went against resveratrol accumulation in callus.During 30d culture period,the 24th day was the ideal harvest and subculture time.Among BLED different photoperiods,8h·d-1 light treatment had significantly inhibition on resveratrol synthesis,and the rest photoperiods had no obvious difference.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GLED most favored callus growth.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferat0
Organ / stage
calluse0
Treatment
GLEDe0
Outcome
callus growthe0
Direction
most conducivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results showed that GLED was most conducive to the callus growth,but suppressed the resveratrol synthesis.BLED had no obvious effect on the callus growth;however,it had stronger promotion on content and production of resveratrol,while RLED went against resveratrol accumulation in callus.During 30d culture period,the 24th day was the ideal harvest and subculture time.Among BLED different photoperiods,8h·d-1 light treatment had significantly inhibition on resveratrol synthesis,and the rest photoperiods had no obvious difference.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 197–733 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vitis vinifera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–116 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GLED suppressed resveratrol synthesis.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferat0
Organ / stage
calluse0
Treatment
GLEDe0
Outcome
resveratrol synthesise0
Direction
suppressede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results showed that GLED was most conducive to the callus growth,but suppressed the resveratrol synthesis.BLED had no obvious effect on the callus growth;however,it had stronger promotion on content and production of resveratrol,while RLED went against resveratrol accumulation in callus.During 30d culture period,the 24th day was the ideal harvest and subculture time.Among BLED different photoperiods,8h·d-1 light treatment had significantly inhibition on resveratrol synthesis,and the rest photoperiods had no obvious difference.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 197–733 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vitis vinifera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–116 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BLED had no obvious effect on callus growth.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferat0
Organ / stage
calluse0
Treatment
BLEDe0
Outcome
callus growthe0
Direction
no obvious effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results showed that GLED was most conducive to the callus growth,but suppressed the resveratrol synthesis.BLED had no obvious effect on the callus growth;however,it had stronger promotion on content and production of resveratrol,while RLED went against resveratrol accumulation in callus.During 30d culture period,the 24th day was the ideal harvest and subculture time.Among BLED different photoperiods,8h·d-1 light treatment had significantly inhibition on resveratrol synthesis,and the rest photoperiods had no obvious difference.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 197–733 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vitis vinifera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–116 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BLED promoted resveratrol content and production.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferat0
Organ / stage
calluse0
Treatment
BLEDe0
Outcome
content and production of resveratrole0
Direction
stronger promotione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results showed that GLED was most conducive to the callus growth,but suppressed the resveratrol synthesis.BLED had no obvious effect on the callus growth;however,it had stronger promotion on content and production of resveratrol,while RLED went against resveratrol accumulation in callus.During 30d culture period,the 24th day was the ideal harvest and subculture time.Among BLED different photoperiods,8h·d-1 light treatment had significantly inhibition on resveratrol synthesis,and the rest photoperiods had no obvious difference.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 197–733 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vitis vinifera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–116 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RLED opposed resveratrol accumulation.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferat0
Organ / stage
calluse0
Treatment
RLEDe0
Outcome
resveratrol accumulatione0
Direction
went againste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results showed that GLED was most conducive to the callus growth,but suppressed the resveratrol synthesis.BLED had no obvious effect on the callus growth;however,it had stronger promotion on content and production of resveratrol,while RLED went against resveratrol accumulation in callus.During 30d culture period,the 24th day was the ideal harvest and subculture time.Among BLED different photoperiods,8h·d-1 light treatment had significantly inhibition on resveratrol synthesis,and the rest photoperiods had no obvious difference.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 197–733 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vitis vinifera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–116 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Day 24 was ideal for harvest and subculture during 30 days of culture.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferat0
Outcome
ideal harvest and subculture timee0
Value
24th daye0
Qualifier
30d culture periode0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results showed that GLED was most conducive to the callus growth,but suppressed the resveratrol synthesis.BLED had no obvious effect on the callus growth;however,it had stronger promotion on content and production of resveratrol,while RLED went against resveratrol accumulation in callus.During 30d culture period,the 24th day was the ideal harvest and subculture time.Among BLED different photoperiods,8h·d-1 light treatment had significantly inhibition on resveratrol synthesis,and the rest photoperiods had no obvious difference.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 197–733 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vitis vinifera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–116 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

An 8h·d-1 BLED photoperiod significantly inhibited resveratrol synthesis.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferat0
Organ / stage
calluse0
Treatment
8h·d-1 light treatmente0
Outcome
resveratrol synthesise0
Direction
inhibitione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results showed that GLED was most conducive to the callus growth,but suppressed the resveratrol synthesis.BLED had no obvious effect on the callus growth;however,it had stronger promotion on content and production of resveratrol,while RLED went against resveratrol accumulation in callus.During 30d culture period,the 24th day was the ideal harvest and subculture time.Among BLED different photoperiods,8h·d-1 light treatment had significantly inhibition on resveratrol synthesis,and the rest photoperiods had no obvious difference.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 197–733 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vitis vinifera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–116 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Other BLED photoperiods did not differ obviously in resveratrol synthesis.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferat0
Organ / stage
calluse0
Treatment
rest photoperiodse0
Outcome
resveratrol synthesise0
Direction
no obvious differencee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results showed that GLED was most conducive to the callus growth,but suppressed the resveratrol synthesis.BLED had no obvious effect on the callus growth;however,it had stronger promotion on content and production of resveratrol,while RLED went against resveratrol accumulation in callus.During 30d culture period,the 24th day was the ideal harvest and subculture time.Among BLED different photoperiods,8h·d-1 light treatment had significantly inhibition on resveratrol synthesis,and the rest photoperiods had no obvious difference.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 197–733 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vitis vinifera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–116 · show in text ↑

light · molecular: metabolites · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 5 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.