Paper · 2014 · Northern Horticulture

Effect of Different Grafting Methods on Greenhouse Cucumber Seedling Quality

Ye Li

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Taking sunspot pumpkin as stock,with‘Bonai33E'cucumber as the scion,the self root plant as the control,using the approach grafting,peg grafting,root cutting grafting,cleft grafting treatment of 4kinds of grafting methods,effect of different grafting methods on growth characteristics of cucumber seedlings were studied.The results showed that root cutting grafting seedling survival rate was the highest,followed by peg method,cleft grafting survival rate was the lowest.Grafted seedlings were significantly were better than those of self root seedling in plant height,stem diameter,leaf area,root length,photosynthesis,protective enzyme activity;each index of root cutting grafting were significantly higher than that of other grafted seedlings.Grafting could significantly increase the protective enzyme content of cucumber seedlings,increased the photosynthetic rate of seedlings and promote the growth.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root cutting grafting gave the highest cucumber seedling survival rate.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
root cutting graftinge0
Outcome
seedling survival ratee0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“root cutting grafting seedling survival rate was the highest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 343–403 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Peg grafting ranked second for seedling survival.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
peg methode0
Outcome
followed by peg methode0
Direction
followed by peg methode0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“followed by peg method”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 404–426 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cleft grafting had the lowest seedling survival rate.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
cleft graftinge0
Outcome
survival ratee0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cleft grafting survival rate was the lowest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 427–470 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafted seedlings had significantly better height, stem diameter and leaf area than self-rooted seedlings.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
Grafted seedlingse0
Outcome
plant height,stem diameter,leaf areae0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
self root seedlinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grafted seedlings were significantly were better than those of self root seedling in plant height,stem diameter,leaf area,root length,photosynthesis,protective enzyme activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 471–646 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafted seedlings had significantly better root length, photosynthesis and protective enzyme activity than self-rooted seedlings.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
Grafted seedlingse0
Outcome
root length,photosynthesis,protective enzyme activitye0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
self root seedlinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grafted seedlings were significantly were better than those of self root seedling in plant height,stem diameter,leaf area,root length,photosynthesis,protective enzyme activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 471–646 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Root cutting grafting exceeded other grafting methods on each measured index.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
root cutting graftinge0
Outcome
each indexe0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
other grafted seedlingse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“each index of root cutting grafting were significantly higher than that of other grafted seedlings.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 647–746 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–59 · show in text ↑

grafting · survival · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

pruning · growth · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 14 positive, 6 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

grafting · growth · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

59 papers: 55 positive, 4 negative or no effect

54 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

55 papers more in this group

See all 59 papers →

grafting · soil: biology · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.