Paper · 2013 · Horticulture & Seed

Effects of Different Layer Spacing Barn on Curing Capacity and Smoking Quality in Tobacco Loading Chamber

Cui Guo-mi

13
claims
28
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

[Objective] The aim was to screen and develop suitable increased loading technology of bulk curing barn, improve quality and increase arome in curing process. [Method] Taking the bulk curing barn commonly used as test equipment,we designed 3 different layer spacing(47.0, 53.3, 80.0 cm(CK))bulk curing barns to research the effects of baking capacity and smoking quality of baked tobacco leaves. [Result] The results showed that, compared with CK, the loading capacity of 47.0 cm layer spacing and 53.3 cm layer spacing improved 14.70%、30.46%.Ignition after 32 h,the gap of vertical temperature and same level temperature of 47.0cm layer spacing bulk barn were greater than CK. Ignition after 120 h,the gap of vertical temperature was 2 0.0 ℃ and the gap of same level temperature was 11.5 ℃.The gap couldn't meet curing requirement. The bigger gap of vertical temperature and same level temperature of 53.3 cm layer spacing bulk barn were 8.0 ℃ and 4.5 ℃. It could meet the requirement of flue curing technique.The aroma characteristics, flue gas characteristics and sensory characteristics of 53.3 cm layer spacing bulk barn were all better than 80.0 cm layer spacing bulk barn(CK).The smoking quality of 47.0 cm layer spacing bulk barn was lower than CK obviously. The wind speeds between leaves were almost same with different circulation fan powers in curing process. [Conclusion] Tobacco production should select barn with layer spacing of 53.3 cm.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Loading capacity improved 14.70% at 47.0 cm layer spacing versus CK.

Treatment
47.0 cm layer spacinge0
Outcome
loading capacitye0
Direction
improvede0
Value
14.70%e0
Comparator
CKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–89 · show in text ↑
e0

“compared with CK, the loading capacity of 47.0 cm layer spacing and 53.3 cm layer spacing improved 14.70%、30.46%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 430–543 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Loading capacity improved 30.46% at 53.3 cm layer spacing versus CK.

Treatment
53.3 cm layer spacinge0
Outcome
loading capacitye0
Direction
improvede0
Value
30.46%e0
Comparator
CKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–89 · show in text ↑
e0

“compared with CK, the loading capacity of 47.0 cm layer spacing and 53.3 cm layer spacing improved 14.70%、30.46%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 430–543 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 47.0 cm spacing, vertical and same-level temperature gaps exceeded CK after 32 hours.

Treatment
47.0cm layer spacinge0
Outcome
gap of vertical temperature and same level temperaturee0
Direction
greatere0
Qualifier
after 32 he0
Comparator
CKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–89 · show in text ↑
e0

“Ignition after 32 h,the gap of vertical temperature and same level temperature of 47.0cm layer spacing bulk barn were greater than CK.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 543–677 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

gap of vertical temperature at 47.0 cm spacing reached 2 0.0 ℃ after 120 hours.

Treatment
47.0cm layer spacinge1
Outcome
gap of vertical temperaturee0
Value
2 0.0 ℃e0
Qualifier
after 120 he0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–89 · show in text ↑
e0

“Ignition after 120 h,the gap of vertical temperature was 2 0.0 ℃ and the gap of same level temperature was 11.5 ℃.The gap couldn't meet curing requirement.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 678–833 · show in text ↑
e1

“Ignition after 32 h,the gap of vertical temperature and same level temperature of 47.0cm layer spacing bulk barn were greater than CK.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 543–677 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

gap of same level temperature at 47.0 cm spacing reached 11.5 ℃ after 120 hours.

Treatment
47.0cm layer spacinge1
Outcome
gap of same level temperaturee0
Value
11.5 ℃e0
Qualifier
after 120 he0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–89 · show in text ↑
e0

“Ignition after 120 h,the gap of vertical temperature was 2 0.0 ℃ and the gap of same level temperature was 11.5 ℃.The gap couldn't meet curing requirement.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 678–833 · show in text ↑
e1

“Ignition after 32 h,the gap of vertical temperature and same level temperature of 47.0cm layer spacing bulk barn were greater than CK.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 543–677 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 47.0 cm temperature gap did not meet curing requirements.

Treatment
47.0cm layer spacinge1
Outcome
couldn't meet curing requiremente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–89 · show in text ↑
e0

“Ignition after 120 h,the gap of vertical temperature was 2 0.0 ℃ and the gap of same level temperature was 11.5 ℃.The gap couldn't meet curing requirement.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 678–833 · show in text ↑
e1

“Ignition after 32 h,the gap of vertical temperature and same level temperature of 47.0cm layer spacing bulk barn were greater than CK.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 543–677 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

gap of vertical temperature at 53.3 cm spacing was 8.0 ℃.

Treatment
53.3 cm layer spacinge0
Outcome
gap of vertical temperaturee0
Value
8.0 ℃e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–89 · show in text ↑
e0

“The bigger gap of vertical temperature and same level temperature of 53.3 cm layer spacing bulk barn were 8.0 ℃ and 4.5 ℃. It could meet the requirement of flue curing technique.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 834–1012 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

gap of same level temperature at 53.3 cm spacing was 4.5 ℃.

Treatment
53.3 cm layer spacinge0
Outcome
same level temperaturee0
Value
4.5 ℃e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–89 · show in text ↑
e0

“The bigger gap of vertical temperature and same level temperature of 53.3 cm layer spacing bulk barn were 8.0 ℃ and 4.5 ℃. It could meet the requirement of flue curing technique.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 834–1012 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 53.3 cm spacing met flue curing requirements.

Treatment
53.3 cm layer spacinge0
Outcome
meet the requirement of flue curing techniquee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–89 · show in text ↑
e0

“The bigger gap of vertical temperature and same level temperature of 53.3 cm layer spacing bulk barn were 8.0 ℃ and 4.5 ℃. It could meet the requirement of flue curing technique.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 834–1012 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aroma, flue gas and sensory characteristics were better at 53.3 cm than 80.0 cm spacing.

Treatment
53.3 cm layer spacinge0
Outcome
aroma characteristics, flue gas characteristics and sensory characteristicse0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
80.0 cm layer spacing bulk barn(CK)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–89 · show in text ↑
e0

“The aroma characteristics, flue gas characteristics and sensory characteristics of 53.3 cm layer spacing bulk barn were all better than 80.0 cm layer spacing bulk barn(CK).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1012–1184 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Smoking quality was lower at 47.0 cm than CK.

Treatment
47.0 cm layer spacinge0
Outcome
smoking qualitye0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
CKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–89 · show in text ↑
e0

“The smoking quality of 47.0 cm layer spacing bulk barn was lower than CK obviously.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1184–1267 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wind speed between leaves was nearly unchanged across fan powers.

Treatment
different circulation fan powerse0
Outcome
wind speeds between leavese0
Direction
almost samee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–89 · show in text ↑
e0

“The wind speeds between leaves were almost same with different circulation fan powers in curing process.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1268–1372 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend 53.3 cm barn spacing for tobacco production.

Outcome
select barn with layer spacing of 53.3 cme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tobacco production should select barn with layer spacing of 53.3 cm.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1386–1454 · show in text ↑

density · quality: phytochemicals · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

density · quality: general · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 3 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.