Paper · 2014 · Tillage and Cultivation

Transplanting Time and Planting Density for Burned Sugar Aroma Style Flue-cured Tobacco

Yong Cai

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

To study the planting modle of burned sugar aroma style flue-cured tobacco,a field experiment was conducted by a complete stochastic design.The effects of transplanting time and planting density on the agronomic,economic characters and quality of flue-cured tobacco were investigated.The results showed that with the delay of transplanting time,the growth progress of the flue-cured tobacco was lagged,the total growth period was to shorten.if the planting density was higher or lower,the yeild and output value were reduced.With early transplanting time,the aroma quality,burned sugar would be to lessen.If the transplanting time was delayed,the sensory quality was reduced.There was no significant difference among planting density in aroma quality.But the high-density planting could reduce the sensory quality.Therefore,in the same area of burned sugar aroma style flue-cured tobacco,the best appropriate transplanting time was 28 th,April,the density planting was 16500plants/hm2.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Delaying transplanting slowed the growth progress of flue-cured tobacco.

Taxon
flue-cured tobaccot0
Treatment
delay of transplanting timee1
Outcome
growth progresse1
Direction
laggede1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Burned Sugar Aroma Style Flue-cured Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–87 · show in text ↑
e1

“with the delay of transplanting time,the growth progress of the flue-cured tobacco was lagged,the total growth period was to shorten”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 308–440 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Delaying transplanting shortened the total growth period of flue-cured tobacco.

Taxon
flue-cured tobaccot0
Treatment
delay of transplanting timee1
Outcome
total growth periode1
Direction
to shortene1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Burned Sugar Aroma Style Flue-cured Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–87 · show in text ↑
e1

“with the delay of transplanting time,the growth progress of the flue-cured tobacco was lagged,the total growth period was to shorten”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 308–440 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Planting density higher or lower than the best level reduced yield and output value of flue-cured tobacco.

Taxon
flue-cured tobaccot0
Treatment
planting density was higher or lowere2
Outcome
yeild and output valuee2
Direction
reducede2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Burned Sugar Aroma Style Flue-cured Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–87 · show in text ↑
e2

“if the planting density was higher or lower,the yeild and output value were reduced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 441–524 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early transplanting reduced burned sugar aroma quality of flue-cured tobacco.

Taxon
flue-cured tobaccot0
Treatment
early transplanting timee3
Outcome
aroma qualitye3
Direction
lessene3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Burned Sugar Aroma Style Flue-cured Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–87 · show in text ↑
e3

“With early transplanting time,the aroma quality,burned sugar would be to lessen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 525–604 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Delayed transplanting reduced sensory quality of flue-cured tobacco.

Taxon
flue-cured tobaccot0
Treatment
transplanting time was delayede4
Outcome
sensory qualitye4
Direction
reducede4

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Burned Sugar Aroma Style Flue-cured Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–87 · show in text ↑
e4

“If the transplanting time was delayed,the sensory quality was reduced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 605–674 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Planting density had no significant effect on aroma quality of flue-cured tobacco.

Taxon
flue-cured tobaccot0
Treatment
planting densitye5
Outcome
aroma qualitye5
Direction
no significant differencee5

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Burned Sugar Aroma Style Flue-cured Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–87 · show in text ↑
e5

“There was no significant difference among planting density in aroma quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 675–750 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High-density planting could reduce sensory quality of flue-cured tobacco.

Taxon
flue-cured tobaccot0
Treatment
high-density plantinge6
Outcome
sensory qualitye6
Direction
reducee6

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Burned Sugar Aroma Style Flue-cured Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–87 · show in text ↑
e6

“But the high-density planting could reduce the sensory quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 751–813 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The best appropriate transplanting time for burned sugar aroma style flue-cured tobacco was 28 April.

Taxon
flue-cured tobaccot0
Outcome
appropriate transplanting timee7
Value
28 th,Aprile7

Verbatim

t0

“Burned Sugar Aroma Style Flue-cured Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–87 · show in text ↑
e7

“the best appropriate transplanting time was 28 th,April,the density planting was 16500plants/hm2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 888–984 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The best planting density for burned sugar aroma style flue-cured tobacco was 16500 plants/hm2.

Taxon
flue-cured tobaccot0
Outcome
density plantinge7
Value
16500plants/hm2e7

Verbatim

t0

“Burned Sugar Aroma Style Flue-cured Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–87 · show in text ↑
e7

“the best appropriate transplanting time was 28 th,April,the density planting was 16500plants/hm2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 888–984 · show in text ↑

density · quality: phytochemicals · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

sowing time · growth · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 2 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

sowing time · quality: general · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 6 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

density · yield · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 20 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.