Paper · 2004

Studies on the control of verticillium wilt of cotton with the mixtures of biological agents and carbendazim

Ли Су; Niu Shan

3
claims
6
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Pot experiments for the control of verticillium wilt with the mixtures of biological agents and carbendazim indicate that the disease control with the mixtures is better than that with carbendazim or biological control agents applied se- parately , the control result of the mixture of carbendazim applied with one Bacillium sp.(B908) is better only than that of carbendazim applied alone, and worse than that of B908 applied alone.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mixtures of biological agents and carbendazim controlled cotton verticillium wilt better than either component applied separately.

Treatment
mixtures of biological agents and carbendazimt0
Outcome
disease controle0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
carbendazim or biological control agents applied se- paratelye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the disease control with the mixtures is better than that with carbendazim or biological control agents applied se- parately”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 122–246 · show in text ↑
t0

“verticillium wilt of cotton with the mixtures of biological agents and carbendazim”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carbendazim mixed with Bacillium sp. (B908) controlled cotton wilt better than carbendazim alone.

Treatment
mixture of carbendazim applied with one Bacillium sp.(B908)e0
Interactor
Bacillium sp.(B908)e0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
control resulte0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
carbendazim applied alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the control result of the mixture of carbendazim applied with one Bacillium sp.(B908) is better only than that of carbendazim applied alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 249–388 · show in text ↑
t0

“verticillium wilt of cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carbendazim mixed with Bacillium sp. (B908) controlled cotton wilt less well than B908 alone.

Treatment
mixture of carbendazim applied with one Bacillium sp.(B908)e0
Interactor
Bacillium sp.(B908)e0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
control resulte0
Direction
worsee0
Comparator
B908 applied alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the control result of the mixture of carbendazim applied with one Bacillium sp.(B908) is better only than that of carbendazim applied alone, and worse than that of B908 applied alone.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 249–432 · show in text ↑
t0

“verticillium wilt of cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–53 · show in text ↑

carbendazim · control · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.