Paper · 2012

Resposta de feijão-caupi a inoculação com rizóbio e Trichoderma sp. no cerrado, Gurupi, TO Response of cowpea to inoculation with rhizobia and Trichoderma sp. in the cerrado, Gurupi, TO

Revista Verde de Agroecologia; Artigo Científico; Aloísio Freitas; et al.

5
claims
11
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Palavras chave: Vigna unguicula L. (Walp.), fixacao biologica de nitrogenio, biocontrole. ABSTRACT - The study aimed to examine the response of cowpea to inoculation with rhizobia and Trichoderma sp. cerrado in Gurupi, TO. The experiment was conducted under field conditions and experimental design of randomized blocks, corresponding to the treatments: inoculation of rhizobia and Trichoderma sp. in the seed, the seed inoculation with rhizobia and Trichoderma sp. in the soil, the seed inoculation with rhizobia and Trichoderma sp. in the seed and soil, only inoculation with rhizobia, control fertilized with nitrogen and control non-inoculated. Inoculation with rhizobia was performed with the strains INPA 03-11B and UFLA 03-84. For treatments with Trichoderma sp. was used to inoculate Trichoplus JCO powder. The results showed that nitrogen fixation potential of the tested strains of rhizobia and bioprotection of Trichoderma was essential for the production of biomass and nodulation. As for productivity, especially for treatments with rhizobia and Trichoderma on seed and rhizobia and Trichoderma in the seed and soil, with higher productivity (p<0.05) than other treatments. The yield in these treatments was approximately 20% higher than the treatments only with rhizobia inoculation and nitrogen control treatment and in more than 500% compared to the control treatment without inoculation with rhizobia and Trichoderma.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation with rhizobia and Trichoderma sp. was essential for cowpea biomass production and nodulation.

Treatment
inoculation with rhizobia and Trichoderma sp.e1
Interactor
rhizobiae3symbiont
Second interactor
TrichodermaTrichodermae3biocontrol_agent
Outcome
production of biomass and nodulatione3
Setting
field conditionse2

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma
Trichoderma · Second interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, [1] · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The study aimed to examine the response of cowpea to inoculation with rhizobia and Trichoderma sp. cerrado in Gurupi, TO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 101–221 · show in text ↑
e2

“The experiment was conducted under field conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 223–274 · show in text ↑
e3

“The results showed that nitrogen fixation potential of the tested strains of rhizobia and bioprotection of Trichoderma was essential for the production of biomass and nodulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 815–992 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobia and Trichoderma applied on the seed had significantly higher cowpea productivity than other treatments.

Treatment
rhizobia and Trichoderma on seede4
Interactor
rhizobiae4symbiont
Second interactor
TrichodermaTrichodermae4biocontrol_agent
Outcome
productivitye4
Direction
highere4
Comparator
other treatmentse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma
Trichoderma · Second interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, [1] · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The study aimed to examine the response of cowpea to inoculation with rhizobia and Trichoderma sp. cerrado in Gurupi, TO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 101–221 · show in text ↑
e4

“As for productivity, especially for treatments with rhizobia and Trichoderma on seed and rhizobia and Trichoderma in the seed and soil, with higher productivity (p<0.05) than other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 994–1185 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobia and Trichoderma applied in the seed and soil had significantly higher cowpea productivity than other treatments.

Treatment
rhizobia and Trichoderma in the seed and soile4
Interactor
rhizobiae4symbiont
Second interactor
TrichodermaTrichodermae4biocontrol_agent
Outcome
productivitye4
Direction
highere4
Comparator
other treatmentse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma
Trichoderma · Second interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, [1] · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The study aimed to examine the response of cowpea to inoculation with rhizobia and Trichoderma sp. cerrado in Gurupi, TO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 101–221 · show in text ↑
e4

“As for productivity, especially for treatments with rhizobia and Trichoderma on seed and rhizobia and Trichoderma in the seed and soil, with higher productivity (p<0.05) than other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 994–1185 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The seed-applied rhizobia and Trichoderma treatments yielded approximately 20% more than the rhizobia-only and nitrogen control treatments.

Treatment
rhizobia and Trichodermae5
Interactor
rhizobiae5symbiont
Second interactor
TrichodermaTrichodermae5biocontrol_agent
Outcome
yielde5
Direction
highere5
Value
approximately 20%e5
Comparator
treatments only with rhizobia inoculation and nitrogen control treatmente5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma
Trichoderma · Second interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, [1] · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The study aimed to examine the response of cowpea to inoculation with rhizobia and Trichoderma sp. cerrado in Gurupi, TO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 101–221 · show in text ↑
e5

“The yield in these treatments was approximately 20% higher than the treatments only with rhizobia inoculation and nitrogen control treatment and in more than 500% compared to the control treatment without inoculation with rhizobia and Trichoderma”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1187–1433 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The rhizobia and Trichoderma treatments yielded more than 500% of the control treatment without inoculation.

Treatment
rhizobia and Trichodermae5
Interactor
rhizobiae5symbiont
Second interactor
TrichodermaTrichodermae5biocontrol_agent
Outcome
yielde5
Direction
higherinferrede5
Value
more than 500%e5
Comparator
control treatment without inoculatione5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma
Trichoderma · Second interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, [1] · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The study aimed to examine the response of cowpea to inoculation with rhizobia and Trichoderma sp. cerrado in Gurupi, TO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 101–221 · show in text ↑
e5

“The yield in these treatments was approximately 20% higher than the treatments only with rhizobia inoculation and nitrogen control treatment and in more than 500% compared to the control treatment without inoculation with rhizobia and Trichoderma”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1187–1433 · show in text ↑

Trichoderma · symbiosis · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Trichoderma · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

inoculation · symbiosis · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results differ

69 papers: 57 positive, 12 negative or no effect

56 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

65 papers more in this group

See all 69 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.