Paper · 2004 · Weed Biology and Management

Prickly sida (Sida spinosa L.) and spurge (Euphorbia hyssopifolia L.) response to wide row and ultra narrow row cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) management systems

WILLIAM T. MOLIN; JOSIE A. HUGIE; KANGETSU HIRASE

6
claims
11
verbatim quotes
16
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A 4 year field study was conducted from 1998 to 2001 to evaluate the response of prickly sida ( Sida spinosa L.) and hyssop spurge ( Euphorbia hyssopifolia L.) growing in either ultra narrow row (UNR) or wide row (WR) cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.) management systems. Weeds surviving pre‐ and postemergence herbicide treatments were harvested just prior to defoliation and the morphological characteristics were compared. Prickly sida growth was significantly reduced with regard to the number of main stem nodes, primary, secondary and tertiary branching, number of seed capsules produced and dry weight under UNR compared with WR. However, plant height was not affected by the management system. Spurge growth was significantly reduced with regard to branching and fresh weight but not height. These results show that UNR might suppress weed development by reducing vegetative and reproductive growth of prickly sida and vegetative growth of spurge. The reduction in seed and seed capsule production of prickly sida is likely to reduce its reproductive potential and also diminish the subsequent seed rain and soil seed bank reserves. Thus, a potential benefit of UNR cotton management systems might be to reduce the competitive ability of weeds and decrease seed production.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ultra narrow rows significantly reduced prickly sida stem nodes and branching compared with wide rows.

Treatment
UNRe0
Interactor
Prickly sidae0weed
Outcome
number of main stem nodes, primary, secondary and tertiary branchinge0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
WRe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Prickly sida growth was significantly reduced with regard to the number of main stem nodes, primary, secondary and tertiary branching, number of seed capsules produced and dry weight under UNR compared with WR.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 424–634 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ultra narrow rows significantly reduced prickly sida seed capsules and dry weight compared with wide rows.

Treatment
UNRe0
Interactor
Prickly sidae0weed
Outcome
number of seed capsules produced and dry weighte0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
WRe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Prickly sida growth was significantly reduced with regard to the number of main stem nodes, primary, secondary and tertiary branching, number of seed capsules produced and dry weight under UNR compared with WR.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 424–634 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Prickly sida height did not differ by row management system.

Treatment
management systeme0
Interactor
Prickly sidat0weed
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, plant height was not affected by the management system.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 635–699 · show in text ↑
t0

“Prickly sida (Sida spinosa L.) and spurge (Euphorbia hyssopifolia L.) response to wide row and ultra narrow row cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ultra narrow rows significantly reduced spurge branching and fresh weight compared with wide rows.

Treatment
ultra narrow rowt0
Interactor
Spurgee0weed
Outcome
branching and fresh weighte0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
wide rowt0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Spurge growth was significantly reduced with regard to branching and fresh weight but not height.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 700–797 · show in text ↑
t0

“spurge (Euphorbia hyssopifolia L.) response to wide row and ultra narrow row cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spurge height was not reduced by ultra narrow rows.

Treatment
ultra narrow rowt0
Interactor
Spurgee0weed
Outcome
heighte0
Direction
not heighte0
Comparator
wide rowt0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Spurge growth was significantly reduced with regard to branching and fresh weight but not height.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 700–797 · show in text ↑
t0

“spurge (Euphorbia hyssopifolia L.) response to wide row and ultra narrow row cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–118 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest ultra narrow row cotton may suppress weed development and seed production.

Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
reduce the competitive ability of weeds and decrease seed productione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Thus, a potential benefit of UNR cotton management systems might be to reduce the competitive ability of weeds and decrease seed production.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1139–1279 · show in text ↑

cultivation system · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 1 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.