Paper · 2013 · Zhongguo shengtai nongye xuebao

Effects of elevated CO_2 and nitrogen application on photosynthetic area and gain-leaf ratio of winter wheat

Xu Yu

19
claims
45
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Either CO2 enrichment or nitrogen(N) application influences growth and development of wheat(Triticum aestivum L.).The effects of elevated CO2 concentration and nitrogen addition on the photosynthetic area of source organs(green leaves,stem sheath,spike and awns),grain number and weight per spike,and grain-leaf ratio of winter wheat at heading stage were investigated in this study.The pot experiment was carried out in open top chambers(OTCs) with two wheat varieties,Xiaoyan 6 and Xiaoyan 22,as materials in 2008—2009.Wheat plants were grown under different treatments of two CO2 concentrations(375 μL.L 1 and 750 μL.L 1) and three nitrogen application levels [0,0.15 g(N).kg 1(soil) and 0.30 g(N).kg 1(soil)].The results showed that nitrogen application significantly increased leaf length and width,stem node length and diameter,spike length and width,awn length.The photosynthetic area,grain number and weight per spike,and grain-leaf ratio of wheat were also enhanced under nitrogen application.Compared with ambient CO2 concentration(375 μL.L 1),elevated CO2 concentration(750 μL.L 1) positively influenced leaf and stem node length,photosynthetic area of leaf,stem node and awn(P 0.05);but it insignificantly affected leaf width,stem node diameter and spike area(P 0.05).CO2 concentration elevation increased the photosynthetic area per stem of Xiaoyan 6 and Xiaoyan 22 by 8.1%~15.1% and 2.8%~13.2%,respectively,with the biggest variable amplitude under the nitrogen application level of 0.30 g(N).kg 1(soil).Under three nitrogen levels,CO 2 enrichment increased spike grain number and the ratio of grain number-leaf area in varying degrees.The grain number-leaf area ratio of two varieties increased most obviously under 0.30 g(N).kg 1(soil) and 0.15 g(N).kg 1(soil),with 44.2% and 41.4% increments compared with the ambient CO 2 concentration.Moreover,high CO 2 concentration reduced spike grain weight and the ratio of grain weight-leaf area under no nitrogen application,but raised them by 43.6% and 20.7% averagely under nitrogen application.The awn area was only 3% of the total photosynthetic area,greatly smaller than those of other resources organs.It suggested that CO 2 enrichment enlarge the photosynthetic area of wheat mainly through elongating leaves and stem.It improved the relationship between sources and sink to increase sink number and mater translocation captivity per unit leaf area simultaneously.Nitrogen addition would promote the response of wheat source and sink growth to CO 2 enrichment.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 19

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen application significantly increased leaf length and width of winter wheat.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
Xiaoyan 6 and Xiaoyan 22e2
Treatment
nitrogen applicatione1
Outcome
leaf length and widthe1
Direction
increasede1
Setting
open top chambers(OTCs)e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–108 · show in text ↑
e1

“nitrogen application significantly increased leaf length and width, stem node length and diameter, spike length and width, awn length”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 737–867 · show in text ↑
e2

“The pot experiment was carried out in open top chambers(OTCs) with two wheat varieties,Xiaoyan 6 and Xiaoyan 22,as materials”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 383–507 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen application significantly increased stem node length and diameter of winter wheat.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
Xiaoyan 6 and Xiaoyan 22e2
Treatment
nitrogen applicatione1
Outcome
stem node length and diametere1
Direction
increasede1
Setting
open top chambers(OTCs)e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–108 · show in text ↑
e1

“nitrogen application significantly increased leaf length and width, stem node length and diameter, spike length and width, awn length”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 737–867 · show in text ↑
e2

“The pot experiment was carried out in open top chambers(OTCs) with two wheat varieties,Xiaoyan 6 and Xiaoyan 22,as materials”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 383–507 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen application significantly increased spike length and width and awn length of winter wheat.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
Xiaoyan 6 and Xiaoyan 22e2
Treatment
nitrogen applicatione1
Outcome
spike length and width, awn lengthe1
Direction
increasede1
Setting
open top chambers(OTCs)e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–108 · show in text ↑
e1

“nitrogen application significantly increased leaf length and width, stem node length and diameter, spike length and width, awn length”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 737–867 · show in text ↑
e2

“The pot experiment was carried out in open top chambers(OTCs) with two wheat varieties,Xiaoyan 6 and Xiaoyan 22,as materials”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 383–507 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen application enhanced the photosynthetic area of winter wheat.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
Xiaoyan 6 and Xiaoyan 22e2
Treatment
nitrogen applicatione3
Outcome
photosynthetic areae3
Direction
enhancede3
Setting
open top chambers(OTCs)e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–108 · show in text ↑
e3

“The photosynthetic area,grain number and weight per spike,and grain-leaf ratio of wheat were also enhanced under nitrogen application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 868–1001 · show in text ↑
e2

“The pot experiment was carried out in open top chambers(OTCs) with two wheat varieties,Xiaoyan 6 and Xiaoyan 22,as materials”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 383–507 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen application enhanced grain number and weight per spike and grain-leaf ratio of winter wheat.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
Xiaoyan 6 and Xiaoyan 22e2
Treatment
nitrogen applicatione3
Outcome
grain number and weight per spike,and grain-leaf ratioe3
Direction
enhancede3
Setting
open top chambers(OTCs)e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–108 · show in text ↑
e3

“The photosynthetic area,grain number and weight per spike,and grain-leaf ratio of wheat were also enhanced under nitrogen application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 868–1001 · show in text ↑
e2

“The pot experiment was carried out in open top chambers(OTCs) with two wheat varieties,Xiaoyan 6 and Xiaoyan 22,as materials”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 383–507 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 positively influenced leaf and stem node length of winter wheat compared with ambient CO2.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
Xiaoyan 6 and Xiaoyan 22e2
Treatment
elevated CO2 concentration(750 μL.L 1)e4
Outcome
leaf and stem node lengthe4
Direction
positively influencede4
Comparator
ambient CO2 concentration(375 μL.L 1)e4
Setting
open top chambers(OTCs)e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–108 · show in text ↑
e4

“Compared with ambient CO2 concentration(375 μL.L 1),elevated CO2 concentration(750 μL.L 1) positively influenced leaf and stem node length,photosynthetic area of leaf,stem node and awn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1002–1186 · show in text ↑
e2

“The pot experiment was carried out in open top chambers(OTCs) with two wheat varieties,Xiaoyan 6 and Xiaoyan 22,as materials”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 383–507 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 positively influenced photosynthetic area of leaf, stem node and awn of winter wheat compared with ambient CO2.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
Xiaoyan 6 and Xiaoyan 22e2
Treatment
elevated CO2 concentration(750 μL.L 1)e4
Outcome
photosynthetic area of leaf,stem node and awne4
Direction
positively influencede4
Comparator
ambient CO2 concentration(375 μL.L 1)e4
Setting
open top chambers(OTCs)e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–108 · show in text ↑
e4

“Compared with ambient CO2 concentration(375 μL.L 1),elevated CO2 concentration(750 μL.L 1) positively influenced leaf and stem node length,photosynthetic area of leaf,stem node and awn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1002–1186 · show in text ↑
e2

“The pot experiment was carried out in open top chambers(OTCs) with two wheat varieties,Xiaoyan 6 and Xiaoyan 22,as materials”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 383–507 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CO2 concentration elevation increased the photosynthetic area per stem of Xiaoyan 6 by 8.1%~15.1% relative to ambient CO2, with the largest change under 0.30 g(N).kg 1(soil) nitrogen.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
Xiaoyan 6e5
Treatment
CO2 concentration elevatione5
Outcome
photosynthetic area per steme5
Direction
increasede5
Value
8.1%~15.1%e5
Qualifier
with the biggest variable amplitude under the nitrogen application level of 0.30 g(N).kg 1(soil)e5
Comparator
ambient CO2 concentration(375 μL.L 1)e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–108 · show in text ↑
e5

“CO2 concentration elevation increased the photosynthetic area per stem of Xiaoyan 6 and Xiaoyan 22 by 8.1%~15.1% and 2.8%~13.2%,respectively,with the biggest variable amplitude under the nitrogen application level of 0.30 g(N).kg 1(soil)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1280–1517 · show in text ↑
e4

“Compared with ambient CO2 concentration(375 μL.L 1),elevated CO2 concentration(750 μL.L 1) positively influenced leaf and stem node length,photosynthetic area of leaf,stem node and awn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1002–1186 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CO2 concentration elevation increased the photosynthetic area per stem of Xiaoyan 22 by 2.8%~13.2% relative to ambient CO2, with the largest change under 0.30 g(N).kg 1(soil) nitrogen.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
Xiaoyan 22e5
Treatment
CO2 concentration elevatione5
Outcome
photosynthetic area per steme5
Direction
increasede5
Value
2.8%~13.2%e5
Qualifier
with the biggest variable amplitude under the nitrogen application level of 0.30 g(N).kg 1(soil)e5
Comparator
ambient CO2 concentration(375 μL.L 1)e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–108 · show in text ↑
e5

“CO2 concentration elevation increased the photosynthetic area per stem of Xiaoyan 6 and Xiaoyan 22 by 8.1%~15.1% and 2.8%~13.2%,respectively,with the biggest variable amplitude under the nitrogen application level of 0.30 g(N).kg 1(soil)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1280–1517 · show in text ↑
e4

“Compared with ambient CO2 concentration(375 μL.L 1),elevated CO2 concentration(750 μL.L 1) positively influenced leaf and stem node length,photosynthetic area of leaf,stem node and awn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1002–1186 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under three nitrogen levels, CO2 enrichment increased spike grain number and the ratio of grain number-leaf area of winter wheat in varying degrees.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
CO 2 enrichmente7
Outcome
spike grain number and the ratio of grain number-leaf areae7
Direction
increasede7
Qualifier
in varying degreese7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–108 · show in text ↑
e7

“Under three nitrogen levels,CO 2 enrichment increased spike grain number and the ratio of grain number-leaf area in varying degrees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1518–1649 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under no nitrogen application, high CO2 reduced spike grain weight and the ratio of grain weight-leaf area of winter wheat.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
high CO 2 concentratione6
Outcome
spike grain weight and the ratio of grain weight-leaf areae6
Direction
reducede6
Qualifier
under no nitrogen applicatione6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–108 · show in text ↑
e6

“high CO 2 concentration reduced spike grain weight and the ratio of grain weight-leaf area under no nitrogen application,but raised them by 43.6% and 20.7% averagely under nitrogen application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1863–2055 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under nitrogen application, high CO2 raised spike grain weight of winter wheat by 43.6% on average.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
high CO 2 concentratione6
Outcome
spike grain weighte6
Direction
raisede6
Value
43.6%e6
Qualifier
averagely under nitrogen applicatione6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–108 · show in text ↑
e6

“high CO 2 concentration reduced spike grain weight and the ratio of grain weight-leaf area under no nitrogen application,but raised them by 43.6% and 20.7% averagely under nitrogen application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1863–2055 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under nitrogen application, high CO2 raised the ratio of grain weight-leaf area of winter wheat by 20.7% on average.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
high CO 2 concentratione6
Outcome
the ratio of grain weight-leaf areae6
Direction
raisede6
Value
20.7%e6
Qualifier
averagely under nitrogen applicatione6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–108 · show in text ↑
e6

“high CO 2 concentration reduced spike grain weight and the ratio of grain weight-leaf area under no nitrogen application,but raised them by 43.6% and 20.7% averagely under nitrogen application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1863–2055 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under 0.30 g(N).kg 1(soil) nitrogen, the grain number-leaf area ratio of winter wheat increased most obviously, by 44.2% compared with ambient CO2.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
0.30 g(N).kg 1(soil)e7
Outcome
grain number-leaf area ratioe7
Direction
increased most obviouslye7
Value
44.2%e7
Comparator
ambient CO 2 concentratione7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–108 · show in text ↑
e7

“The grain number-leaf area ratio of two varieties increased most obviously under 0.30 g(N).kg 1(soil) and 0.15 g(N).kg 1(soil),with 44.2% and 41.4% increments compared with the ambient CO 2 concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1650–1853 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under 0.15 g(N).kg 1(soil) nitrogen, the grain number-leaf area ratio of winter wheat increased most obviously, by 41.4% compared with ambient CO2.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
0.15 g(N).kg 1(soil)e7
Outcome
grain number-leaf area ratioe7
Direction
increased most obviouslye7
Value
41.4%e7
Comparator
ambient CO 2 concentratione7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–108 · show in text ↑
e7

“The grain number-leaf area ratio of two varieties increased most obviously under 0.30 g(N).kg 1(soil) and 0.15 g(N).kg 1(soil),with 44.2% and 41.4% increments compared with the ambient CO 2 concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1650–1853 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The awn area of winter wheat was only 3% of the total photosynthetic area, much smaller than other source organs.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Organ / stage
awne0
Outcome
awn areae0
Value
3%e0
Qualifier
greatly smaller than those of other resources organse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–108 · show in text ↑
e0

“The awn area was only 3% of the total photosynthetic area,greatly smaller than those of other resources organs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2056–2166 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CO2 enrichment is suggested to enlarge the photosynthetic area of wheat mainly through elongating leaves and stem.

Treatment
CO 2 enrichmente1
Outcome
photosynthetic areae1
Qualifier
mainly through elongating leaves and steme1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“It suggested that CO 2 enrichment enlarge the photosynthetic area of wheat mainly through elongating leaves and stem”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2167–2283 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CO2 enrichment is suggested to improve the source-sink relationship of winter wheat, increasing sink number and assimilate translocation capacity per unit leaf area simultaneously.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
sink number and mater translocation captivity per unit leaf areae2
Qualifier
improved the relationship between sources and sinke2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–108 · show in text ↑
e2

“It improved the relationship between sources and sink to increase sink number and mater translocation captivity per unit leaf area simultaneously”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2284–2429 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen addition is expected to promote the response of wheat source and sink growth to CO2 enrichment.

Treatment
Nitrogen additione3
Outcome
source and sink growthe3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Nitrogen addition would promote the response of wheat source and sink growth to CO 2 enrichment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2430–2525 · show in text ↑

co2 · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

97 papers: 69 positive, 28 negative or no effect

68 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

93 papers more in this group

See all 97 papers →

nitrogen · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

120 papers: 98 positive, 22 negative or no effect

97 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

116 papers more in this group

See all 120 papers →

co2 · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

203 papers: 174 positive, 29 negative or no effect

173 papers in the same direction as this paper · 29 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

199 papers more in this group

See all 203 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

551 papers: 426 positive, 125 negative or no effect

425 papers in the same direction as this paper · 116 in the opposite direction · 9 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

547 papers more in this group

See all 551 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2,061 papers: 1,737 positive, 324 negative or no effect

1,736 papers in the same direction as this paper · 285 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

2,057 papers more in this group

See all 2,061 papers →

altitude · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.