Abstract
The growth and development of mung bean (Phaseolus radiatus L.) seedlings were studied under the periodic scanning light. The results showed that the elongation and extension of leaves of seedlings under the periodic scanning light were less than that of seedlings under normal white light. And the fresh weight of leaves and chlorophyll content of the former were also less than that of the latter. The longer the seedlings grew under the periodic scanning light, the more obvious the difference between them. Furthermore, the UBE of +1 leaves were also increased greatly by the periodic scanning light. The results suggested that the periodic scanning light was not favorable to the growth of mung bean seedling.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Periodic scanning light reduced leaf elongation and extension relative to normal white light.
- Taxon
- Mung Bean
.jpg?width=60)
Vigna radiatat0 - Treatment
- periodic scanning lighte0
- Outcome
- elongation and extension of leavese0
- Direction
- less thane0
- Comparator
- normal white lighte0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“Mung Bean Seedlings”
e0“the elongation and extension of leaves of seedlings under the periodic scanning light were less than that of seedlings under normal white light”
Claim · model-written summary
Periodic scanning light reduced leaf fresh weight and chlorophyll content relative to normal white light.
- Taxon
- Mung BeanVigna radiatat0
- Treatment
- periodic scanning lighte1
- Outcome
- fresh weight of leaves and chlorophyll contente0
- Direction
- less thane0
- Comparator
- normal white lighte1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Mung Bean Seedlings”
e0“the fresh weight of leaves and chlorophyll content of the former were also less than that of the latter”
e1“periodic scanning light were less than that of seedlings under normal white light”
Claim · model-written summary
The difference under periodic scanning light became more obvious as seedlings grew longer.
- Taxon
- Mung BeanVigna radiatat0
- Treatment
- periodic scanning lighte0
- Outcome
- difference between theme0
- Direction
- more obviouse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Mung Bean Seedlings”
e0“The longer the seedlings grew under the periodic scanning light, the more obvious the difference between them”
Claim · model-written summary
Periodic scanning light greatly increased UBE of +1 leaves.
- Taxon
- Mung BeanVigna radiatat0
- Treatment
- periodic scanning lighte0
- Outcome
- UBE of +1 leavese0
- Direction
- increased greatlye0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Mung Bean Seedlings”
e0“the UBE of +1 leaves were also increased greatly by the periodic scanning light”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors judged periodic scanning light unfavorable to mung bean seedling growth.
- Taxon
- mung beanVigna radiatae0
- Treatment
- periodic scanning lighte0
- Outcome
- not favorable to the growth of mung bean seedlinge0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The results suggested that the periodic scanning light was not favorable to the growth of mung bean seedling”
The same questions in other papers
light · physiology: pigments · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →light · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results
7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
16 papers more in this group
See all 20 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.