Paper · 1968 · Queensland Department of Agriculture and Fisheries archive of scientific and research publications (Queensland Department of Agriculture and Fisheries)

Reduction of Banana anthracnose following hot-water treatment of the green fruit.

O. J. Burden

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
8
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The tolerance of banana fruit to hot-water dipping was established. Complete control of artificially induced latent infections of Colletotrichum musae was achieved in the laboratory by dipping green fruit in hot water at 55°C for 2 min before ripening. This treatment also effectively destroyed conidia of the fungus. In larger semi-commercial scale experiments using naturally infected fruit, significant but not complete control of anthracnose and crown rot was obtained. Some delay in ripening was caused by the bot-water treatment, but this was variable. The rate of pulp ripening was not affected by the treatment.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 55°C two minute dip completely controlled artificial latent C. musae infections.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
dipping green fruit in hot water at 55°C for 2 mine0
Interactor
Colletotrichum musaeColletotrichum musaee0pathogen
Outcome
latent infections of Colletotrichum musaee0
Direction
Complete controle0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Colletotrichum musae
Colletotrichum musae · InteractorPlant pests and diseases · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Complete control of artificially induced latent infections of Colletotrichum musae was achieved in the laboratory by dipping green fruit in hot water at 55°C for 2 min before ripening”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 68–251 · show in text ↑
t0

“Banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–19 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hot water destroyed fungal conidia.

Taxon
Bananat0
Treatment
hot-water treatmentt0
Outcome
conidia of the funguse0
Direction
destroyede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“This treatment also effectively destroyed conidia of the fungus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 253–316 · show in text ↑
t0

“Banana anthracnose following hot-water treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Hot water gave significant but incomplete control of natural anthracnose and crown rot.

Taxon
Bananat0
Treatment
hot-water treatmentt0
Outcome
anthracnose and crown rote0
Direction
controle0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“significant but not complete control of anthracnose and crown rot was obtained”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 394–472 · show in text ↑
t0

“Banana anthracnose following hot-water treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hot water variably delayed ripening.

Taxon
Bananat0
Treatment
bot-water treatmente0
Outcome
ripeninge0
Direction
delaye0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Some delay in ripening was caused by the bot-water treatment, but this was variable”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 474–557 · show in text ↑
t0

“Banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–19 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hot water did not affect pulp ripening rate.

Taxon
Bananat0
Treatment
hot-water treatmentt0
Outcome
rate of pulp ripeninge0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The rate of pulp ripening was not affected by the treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 559–618 · show in text ↑
t0

“Banana anthracnose following hot-water treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–61 · show in text ↑

heat · quality: postharvest · MusaResults differ

17 papers: 11 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

heat · disease · MusaPositive and negative results

13 papers: 11 positive, 2 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

heat · Colletotrichum musae · MusaResults agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

application · Colletotrichum musae · MusaResults agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.