Abstract
Field trials in influence on seed germination and the controlling of disease-and-insect-pests during wheat seedling with fludioxonil+isofenphos-methyl seed coating were performed. The experimental results showed that fludioxonil+ isofenphos-methyl seed coating had no harmful effect on the germination of wheat seed, by contraries, it can promote the germination of wheat seed and it was more safely than conventional seed coatings. The treatment of 1∶20∶400(coating: water: seed) displayed well prevention effect on the control of wheat root-diseased and underground pests during wheat seedling growth, the percentage of prevention was up to 94.4 % to root-diseased and was 100 % to underground pests; the second was the treatment of 1∶20∶500(coating: water: seed), its percentage of prevention to root-diseased and to underground pests was up to 89.8 % and 97.4 %, respectively. So, fludioxonil+isofenphos-methyl seed coating was a kind of good alternative seed coating and worth popularizing in the course of wheat production. In views of prevention effect and use costs, the reasonable and economical dosage should be 1∶20∶500 (coating: water: seed).
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
The seed coating had no harmful effect on wheat seed germination.
- Taxon
- Wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- fludioxonil+ isofenphos-methyl seed coatinge0
- Outcome
- germination of wheat seede0
- Direction
- no harmful effecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Wheat”
t1“Seed Coating”
e0“fludioxonil+ isofenphos-methyl seed coating had no harmful effect on the germination of wheat seed”
Claim · model-written summary
The seed coating promoted wheat seed germination.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- Seed Coatingt1
- Outcome
- germination of wheat seede0
- Direction
- promotee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Wheat”
t1“Seed Coating”
e0“it can promote the germination of wheat seed”
Claim · model-written summary
The coating was safer than conventional seed coatings.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- Seed Coatingt1
- Outcome
- more safelye0
- Direction
- more safelye0
- Comparator
- conventional seed coatingse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Wheat”
t1“Seed Coating”
e0“it was more safely than conventional seed coatings”
Claim · model-written summary
At 1∶20∶400, coating prevented root disease by 94.4 %.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- 1∶20∶400(coating: water: seed)e0
- Outcome
- wheat root-diseasede0
- Direction
- preventione0
- Value
- 94.4 %e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Wheat”
t1“Seed Coating”
e0“The treatment of 1∶20∶400(coating: water: seed) displayed well prevention effect on the control of wheat root-diseased and underground pests during wheat seedling growth, the percentage of prevention was up to 94.4 % to root-diseased”
Claim · model-written summary
At 1∶20∶400, coating prevented underground pests by 100 %.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- Seed Coatingt1
- Interactor
- underground pestse0pest
- Outcome
- underground pestse0
- Value
- 100 %e0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Wheat”
t1“Seed Coating”
e0“was 100 % to underground pests”
Claim · model-written summary
At 1∶20∶500, coating prevented root disease by 89.8 %.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- 1∶20∶500(coating: water: seed)e0
- Outcome
- root-diseasede0
- Direction
- preventione0
- Value
- 89.8 %e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Wheat”
t1“Seed Coating”
e0“the second was the treatment of 1∶20∶500(coating: water: seed), its percentage of prevention to root-diseased and to underground pests was up to 89.8 % and 97.4 %, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
At 1∶20∶500, coating prevented underground pests by 97.4 %.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- 1∶20∶500(coating: water: seed)e0
- Interactor
- underground pestse0pest
- Outcome
- underground pestse0
- Direction
- preventione0
- Value
- 97.4 %e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Wheat”
t1“Seed Coating”
e0“the second was the treatment of 1∶20∶500(coating: water: seed), its percentage of prevention to root-diseased and to underground pests was up to 89.8 % and 97.4 %, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors recommend the economical 1∶20∶500 coating dosage.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Outcome
- reasonable and economical dosage should be 1∶20∶500 (coating: water: seed)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Wheat”
t1“Seed Coating”
e0“the reasonable and economical dosage should be 1∶20∶500 (coating: water: seed)”
The same questions in other papers
storage · pest · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →seed treatment · pest · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
31 papers more in this group
See all 35 papers →seed treatment · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
258 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
289 papers more in this group
See all 293 papers →storage · organism · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.