Paper · 2009 · Acta Ecologica Sinica

Effects of light intensity and nitrogen application on the growth and photosynthetic characteristics of Trifolium repens L.

Shangguan Zhou

20
claims
33
verbatim quotes
5
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The responses of Trifolium repens L.seedlings in growth,biomass and photosynthetic characteristics to 2 light intensity levels and 5 nitrogen application rate levels were hydroponically studied in growth chamber.The results showed that the stem and leaf biomass of Trifolium repens L.seedlings increased as the nitrogen concentrations increased from 5 to 15 mmol·L-1 and then decreased with the nitrogen concentrations moved from 20 to 25 mmol·L-1,but the root biomass and root/shoot ratio of Trifolium repens L.seedlings decreased with the increasing nitrogen concentration.The biomass of roots,stems,leaves and whole plant under low light decreased by 67.8%,29.9%,42.5% and 45.2%,respectively,and the root/shoot ratios decreased,but the specific leaf areas(SLA) was opposite.The root volumes of Trifolium repens L.seedlings decreased with the increasing nitrogen concentrations,when the root volume of Trifolium repens L.seedlings at the higher light intensity were higher than those at the lower light intensity.The root surface areas,root diameters and root lengths of Trifolium repens L.seedlings increased as the nitrogen concentrations from 5 to 15 mmol·L-1 and then decreased with the nitrogen concentrations moved from 20 to 25 mmol·L-1.The effects of light intensity on root length and root diameter of Trifolium repens L.seedlings significantly differed,but the root surface areas did not significantly differed.The photosynthetic rates(Pn) of Trifolium repens L.seedlings at the higher light intensity were higher than those at the lower light intensity,and the Pn increased as the nitrogen concentrations increased from 5 to 15 mmol·L-1 and then decreased as the nitrogen concentrations moved from 20 to 25 mmol·L-1.The effects of light intensity on stomatal conductance(Gs),intercellular CO2 concentration(Ci) and transpiration rate(Tr) did not significantly differed,but the effects of nitrogen concentration on Gs,Ci and Tr were significant.The effect of light and nitrogen as well their interaction on seedling growth and photosynthesis of Trifolium repens L.seedlings were significant.Light and nitrogen shortages all inhibited the growth capacity of the seedling,but the seedlings also had the capacities to acclimatize and adapt to the disadvantageous environments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stem and leaf biomass rose from 5 to 15 mmol·L-1 nitrogen, then fell from 20 to 25 mmol·L-1.

Taxon
Trifolium repens L.Trifolium repense0
Treatment
nitrogen concentrationse0
Outcome
stem and leaf biomasse0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
20 to 25 mmol·L-1e0
Comparator
5 to 15 mmol·L-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the stem and leaf biomass of Trifolium repens L.seedlings increased as the nitrogen concentrations increased from 5 to 15 mmol·L-1 and then decreased with the nitrogen concentrations moved from 20 to 25 mmol·L-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 236–447 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root biomass and root/shoot ratio decreased as nitrogen concentration increased.

Taxon
Trifolium repens L.Trifolium repense0
Treatment
increasing nitrogen concentratione0
Outcome
root biomass and root/shoot ratioe0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the root biomass and root/shoot ratio of Trifolium repens L.seedlings decreased with the increasing nitrogen concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 452–574 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low light reduced root biomass by 67.8%.

Taxon
Trifolium repens L.Trifolium repenst0
Treatment
low lighte0
Outcome
biomass of rootse0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
67.8%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The biomass of roots,stems,leaves and whole plant under low light decreased by 67.8%,29.9%,42.5% and 45.2%,respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 575–694 · show in text ↑
t0

“Trifolium repens L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low light reduced stem biomass by 29.9%.

Taxon
Trifolium repens L.Trifolium repenst0
Treatment
low lighte0
Outcome
stemse0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
29.9%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The biomass of roots,stems,leaves and whole plant under low light decreased by 67.8%,29.9%,42.5% and 45.2%,respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 575–694 · show in text ↑
t0

“Trifolium repens L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low light reduced leaf biomass by 42.5%.

Taxon
Trifolium repens L.Trifolium repenst0
Treatment
low lighte0
Outcome
leavese0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
42.5%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The biomass of roots,stems,leaves and whole plant under low light decreased by 67.8%,29.9%,42.5% and 45.2%,respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 575–694 · show in text ↑
t0

“Trifolium repens L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low light reduced whole-plant biomass by 45.2%.

Taxon
Trifolium repens L.Trifolium repenst0
Treatment
low lighte0
Outcome
whole plante0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
45.2%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The biomass of roots,stems,leaves and whole plant under low light decreased by 67.8%,29.9%,42.5% and 45.2%,respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 575–694 · show in text ↑
t0

“Trifolium repens L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low light decreased root/shoot ratios.

Taxon
Trifolium repens L.Trifolium repenst0
Outcome
root/shoot ratiose0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the root/shoot ratios decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 699–730 · show in text ↑
t0

“Trifolium repens L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Specific leaf area responded oppositely to the biomass decrease under low light.

Taxon
Trifolium repens L.Trifolium repenst0
Treatment
low lighte1
Outcome
specific leaf areas(SLA)e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the specific leaf areas(SLA) was opposite”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 735–776 · show in text ↑
e1

“under low light decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 625–650 · show in text ↑
t0

“Trifolium repens L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root volume decreased with increasing nitrogen concentration.

Taxon
Trifolium repens L.Trifolium repense0
Treatment
increasing nitrogen concentrationse0
Outcome
root volumese0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The root volumes of Trifolium repens L.seedlings decreased with the increasing nitrogen concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 777–879 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root volume was higher at higher than lower light intensity.

Taxon
Trifolium repens L.Trifolium repense0
Treatment
higher light intensitye0
Outcome
root volumee0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
lower light intensitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the root volume of Trifolium repens L.seedlings at the higher light intensity were higher than those at the lower light intensity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 885–1014 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root surface area, diameter and length rose at 5–15 mmol·L-1 nitrogen then fell at 20–25 mmol·L-1.

Taxon
Trifolium repens L.Trifolium repense0
Treatment
nitrogen concentrationse0
Outcome
root surface areas,root diameters and root lengthse0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
20 to 25 mmol·L-1e0
Comparator
5 to 15 mmol·L-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The root surface areas,root diameters and root lengths of Trifolium repens L.seedlings increased as the nitrogen concentrations from 5 to 15 mmol·L-1 and then decreased with the nitrogen concentrations moved from 20 to 25 mmol·L-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1015–1245 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Light intensity effects differed significantly for root length and diameter.

Taxon
Trifolium repens L.Trifolium repense0
Treatment
light intensitye0
Outcome
root length and root diametere0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effects of light intensity on root length and root diameter of Trifolium repens L.seedlings significantly differed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1246–1364 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Light intensity did not significantly affect root surface area.

Taxon
Trifolium repens L.Trifolium repenst0
Outcome
root surface arease0

Not reportedTreatmentComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the root surface areas did not significantly differed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1369–1422 · show in text ↑
t0

“Trifolium repens L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Photosynthetic rate was higher under higher than lower light intensity.

Taxon
Trifolium repens L.Trifolium repense0
Treatment
higher light intensitye0
Outcome
photosynthetic rates(Pn)e0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
lower light intensitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The photosynthetic rates(Pn) of Trifolium repens L.seedlings at the higher light intensity were higher than those at the lower light intensity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1423–1565 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Photosynthetic rate rose with nitrogen from 5 to 15 mmol·L-1 then fell from 20 to 25 mmol·L-1.

Taxon
Trifolium repens L.Trifolium repenst0
Treatment
nitrogen concentrationse0
Outcome
Pne0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
20 to 25 mmol·L-1e0
Comparator
5 to 15 mmol·L-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the Pn increased as the nitrogen concentrations increased from 5 to 15 mmol·L-1 and then decreased as the nitrogen concentrations moved from 20 to 25 mmol·L-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1570–1728 · show in text ↑
t0

“Trifolium repens L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Light intensity did not significantly change stomatal conductance, intercellular CO2 or transpiration.

Taxon
Trifolium repens L.Trifolium repenst0
Treatment
light intensitye0
Outcome
stomatal conductance(Gs),intercellular CO2 concentration(Ci) and transpiration rate(Tr)e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effects of light intensity on stomatal conductance(Gs),intercellular CO2 concentration(Ci) and transpiration rate(Tr) did not significantly differed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1729–1881 · show in text ↑
t0

“Trifolium repens L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen concentration significantly affected stomatal conductance, intercellular CO2 and transpiration.

Taxon
Trifolium repens L.Trifolium repenst0
Treatment
nitrogen concentratione0
Outcome
Gs,Ci and Tre0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the effects of nitrogen concentration on Gs,Ci and Tr were significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1886–1956 · show in text ↑
t0

“Trifolium repens L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Light, nitrogen and their interaction significantly affected seedling growth and photosynthesis.

Taxon
Trifolium repens L.Trifolium repense0
Treatment
light and nitrogen as well their interactione0
Outcome
seedling growth and photosynthesise0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effect of light and nitrogen as well their interaction on seedling growth and photosynthesis of Trifolium repens L.seedlings were significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1957–2102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Light and nitrogen shortage inhibited seedling growth capacity.

Taxon
Trifolium repens L.Trifolium repenst0
Treatment
Light and nitrogen shortagese0
Outcome
growth capacity of the seedlinge0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Light and nitrogen shortages all inhibited the growth capacity of the seedling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2103–2181 · show in text ↑
t0

“Trifolium repens L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–123 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seedlings showed capacity to acclimatize and adapt to adverse environments.

Taxon
Trifolium repens L.Trifolium repenst0
Outcome
capacities to acclimatize and adapt to the disadvantageous environmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the seedlings also had the capacities to acclimatize and adapt to the disadvantageous environments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2186–2284 · show in text ↑
t0

“Trifolium repens L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–123 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · growth · Trifolium repens (white clover)Results differ

28 papers: 13 positive, 15 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

light · physiology: photosynthesis · Trifolium repens (white clover)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

light · physiology: gas exchange · Trifolium repens (white clover)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

light · growth · Trifolium repens (white clover)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 3 positive, 5 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.