Paper · 1995 · The Journal of Agricultural Science

Effect of herbage rejection by steers on white clover (Trifolium repens) branching and development in continuously stocked grass–clover swards

N. Teuber; A. S. Laidlaw

9
claims
9
verbatim quotes
6
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

SUMMARY The proportion of sward area rejected for grazing under different stocking intensities in grass-white clover ( Trifolium repens L.) swards continuously grazed by steers toconstant sward height was determined and the effect of these areas on clover stolon developmentwas investigated. In a randomized block field experiment, grazing treatments imposed from 1988 to 1991 comprised target sward surface heights (SSH) of 5, 7 or 9 cm from April to July followed by 7 or 9 cm from July to October (i.e. six treatments). The percentage area rejected was higher in 9 cm than in the shorter swards, the proportion of the total areas rejected increasing generally over the year. Within the rejected areas in spring the number of branches on the main axes of white clover plants was only 17% and the mean number of nodes per branch was 14% of those in grazed areas. Corresponding percentages in summer in rejected areas were 56 and 46% compared with grazed areas. In a glasshouse experiment involving stolons grown for 18–21 days, the difference between those from grazed and rejected areas in branch number per stolon and mean node number per branch was much reduced. Branching and rate of branch development (node number) were slower in stolons maintained under dark conditions. Mean growing point density over six sampling dates from summer 1990 to autumn 1991 was significantly higher in the 5 cm than in the 9 cm spring SSH treatment. Although rejected areashad only 34% of the growing point density of grazed areas in autumn, the latter comprised the majority of the total area in most sward height treatments and so reduced the overall effect of rejected areas on growing point density.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rejected grazing area was higher in 9 cm than shorter swards and generally rose over the year.

Outcome
percentage area rejectede0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The percentage area rejected was higher in 9 cm than in the shorter swards, the proportion of the total areas rejected increasing generally over the year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 523–676 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In spring, clover main-axis branch number in rejected areas was 17% of grazed areas.

Taxon
white cloverTrifolium repense0
Outcome
number of branches on the main axese0
Value
17%e0
Comparator
grazed arease0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Within the rejected areas in spring the number of branches on the main axes of white clover plants was only 17% and the mean number of nodes per branch was 14% of those in grazed areas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 678–862 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In spring, mean nodes per branch in rejected areas were 14% of grazed areas.

Taxon
white cloverTrifolium repense0
Outcome
mean number of nodes per branche0
Value
14%e0
Comparator
grazed arease0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Within the rejected areas in spring the number of branches on the main axes of white clover plants was only 17% and the mean number of nodes per branch was 14% of those in grazed areas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 678–862 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In summer, branch number in rejected areas was 56% of grazed areas.

Outcome
Corresponding percentagese0
Value
56e0
Comparator
grazed arease0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Corresponding percentages in summer in rejected areas were 56 and 46% compared with grazed areas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 864–960 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In summer, nodes per branch in rejected areas were 46% of grazed areas.

Outcome
Corresponding percentagese0
Value
46%e0
Comparator
grazed arease0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Corresponding percentages in summer in rejected areas were 56 and 46% compared with grazed areas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 864–960 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After glasshouse growth, branch and node differences between stolons from grazed and rejected areas were reduced.

Outcome
branch number per stolon and mean node number per branche0
Direction
much reducede0
Setting
glasshousee0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“In a glasshouse experiment involving stolons grown for 18–21 days, the difference between those from grazed and rejected areas in branch number per stolon and mean node number per branch was much reduced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 962–1165 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dark conditions slowed stolon branching and branch development.

Treatment
dark conditionse0
Outcome
Branching and rate of branch development (node number)e0
Direction
slowere0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Branching and rate of branch development (node number) were slower in stolons maintained under dark conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1167–1277 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Growing point density was higher under 5 cm than 9 cm spring sward height.

Treatment
5 cme0
Outcome
Mean growing point densitye0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
9 cme0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Mean growing point density over six sampling dates from summer 1990 to autumn 1991 was significantly higher in the 5 cm than in the 9 cm spring SSH treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1279–1436 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rejected areas had 34% of the growing point density of grazed areas in autumn.

Outcome
growing point densitye0
Value
34%e0
Comparator
grazed arease0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“rejected areashad only 34% of the growing point density of grazed areas in autumn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1447–1528 · show in text ↑

light · growth · Trifolium repens (white clover)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 3 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.