Paper · 2012

Effects of Bagging on Pesticides Residues in Muskmelon

Dong YuMei

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

To study the effect of bagging on pesticide residues of different pesticide treatments and different muskmelon varieties.In this study Jinyu and M135 were used as materials to determine the residues of Carbendazim and Dichlorvos in bagging and no bagging fruit by GC and HPLC.The results showed bagging could reduce the carbendazim residues in Jinyu and M135,respectively,by 37.2% and 59.7% as compared with no bagging;at the same time,in Jinyu,the bagging fruit contained much lower Dichlorvos residues than the no-bagging fruit,and there was no significant difference in M135.The experiment showed that bagging can reduce the pesticide residues in fruit,however,the different varieties also have some influence on the pesticide residues.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bagging reduced carbendazim residues in Jinyu muskmelon fruit by 37.2% compared with no bagging.

Taxon
MuskmelonCucumis melot0
Material
Jinyue0
Treatment
bagginge0
Outcome
carbendazim residuese0
Direction
reducee0
Value
37.2%e0
Comparator
no bagginge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Muskmelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–54 · show in text ↑
e0

“bagging could reduce the carbendazim residues in Jinyu and M135,respectively,by 37.2% and 59.7% as compared with no bagging”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 295–418 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bagging reduced carbendazim residues in M135 muskmelon fruit by 59.7% compared with no bagging.

Taxon
MuskmelonCucumis melot0
Material
M135e0
Treatment
bagginge0
Outcome
carbendazim residuese0
Direction
reducee0
Value
59.7%e0
Comparator
no bagginge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Muskmelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–54 · show in text ↑
e0

“bagging could reduce the carbendazim residues in Jinyu and M135,respectively,by 37.2% and 59.7% as compared with no bagging”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 295–418 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In Jinyu, bagged fruit contained much lower dichlorvos residues than non-bagged fruit.

Taxon
MuskmelonCucumis melot0
Material
Jinyue0
Treatment
bagginge0
Outcome
Dichlorvos residuese0
Direction
much lowere0
Comparator
no-bagging fruite0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Muskmelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–54 · show in text ↑
e0

“in Jinyu,the bagging fruit contained much lower Dichlorvos residues than the no-bagging fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 436–529 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In M135 there was no significant difference in dichlorvos residues between bagged and non-bagged fruit.

Taxon
MuskmelonCucumis melot0
Material
M135e0
Treatment
bagginge0
Outcome
Dichlorvos residuese0
Direction
no significant differencee0
Comparator
no-bagging fruite0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Muskmelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–54 · show in text ↑
e0

“the bagging fruit contained much lower Dichlorvos residues than the no-bagging fruit,and there was no significant difference in M135”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 445–577 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Muskmelon variety also had some influence on pesticide residues in the fruit.

Taxon
MuskmelonCucumis melot0
Material
different varietiese0
Outcome
pesticide residuese0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Muskmelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–54 · show in text ↑
e0

“the different varieties also have some influence on the pesticide residues”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 664–738 · show in text ↑

trap barrier · molecular: metabolites · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.