Paper · 2000 · T'u Jang T'ung Pao

Utilization of Seedling and transplanting of rape and cotton to ameliorate medium saline soil

Wu Hai

7
claims
9
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Upon two years' seeding and transplanting of rape and cotton, total soil salt(0 20cm) was reduced from 0 353 to 0 177%, whereas SOM, total N, alkaline hydrolysable N, and rapidly available Prnwere increased by 39 0,12 9,59 2,and 160 8% respectively. However, rapidly available K was 12 0% lower. The net profit from the cropping pattem mentioned above was gained by 84 5% compared with one spring cotton pa.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two years of rape and cotton cropping reduced total soil salt(0 20cm) by/to 0 353 to 0 177%.

Treatment
two years' seeding and transplanting of rape and cottone0
Outcome
total soil salt(0 20cm)e0
Direction
reducede0
Value
0 353 to 0 177%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Upon two years' seeding and transplanting of rape and cotton, total soil salt(0 20cm) was reduced from 0 353 to 0 177%, whereas SOM, total N, alkaline hydrolysable N, and rapidly available Prnwere increased by 39 0,12 9,59 2,and 160 8% respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–248 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two years of rape and cotton cropping increased SOM by/to 39 0.

Treatment
two years' seeding and transplanting of rape and cottone0
Outcome
SOMe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
39 0e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Upon two years' seeding and transplanting of rape and cotton, total soil salt(0 20cm) was reduced from 0 353 to 0 177%, whereas SOM, total N, alkaline hydrolysable N, and rapidly available Prnwere increased by 39 0,12 9,59 2,and 160 8% respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–248 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two years of rape and cotton cropping increased total N by/to 12 9.

Treatment
two years' seeding and transplanting of rape and cottone0
Outcome
total Ne0
Direction
increasede0
Value
12 9e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Upon two years' seeding and transplanting of rape and cotton, total soil salt(0 20cm) was reduced from 0 353 to 0 177%, whereas SOM, total N, alkaline hydrolysable N, and rapidly available Prnwere increased by 39 0,12 9,59 2,and 160 8% respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–248 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two years of rape and cotton cropping increased alkaline hydrolysable N by/to 59 2.

Treatment
two years' seeding and transplanting of rape and cottone0
Outcome
alkaline hydrolysable Ne0
Direction
increasede0
Value
59 2e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Upon two years' seeding and transplanting of rape and cotton, total soil salt(0 20cm) was reduced from 0 353 to 0 177%, whereas SOM, total N, alkaline hydrolysable N, and rapidly available Prnwere increased by 39 0,12 9,59 2,and 160 8% respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–248 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two years of rape and cotton cropping increased rapidly available Prn by/to 160 8%.

Treatment
two years' seeding and transplanting of rape and cottone0
Outcome
rapidly available Prne0
Direction
increasede0
Value
160 8%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Upon two years' seeding and transplanting of rape and cotton, total soil salt(0 20cm) was reduced from 0 353 to 0 177%, whereas SOM, total N, alkaline hydrolysable N, and rapidly available Prnwere increased by 39 0,12 9,59 2,and 160 8% respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–248 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rapidly available K was lower after the cropping pattern.

Treatment
rape and cottont0
Outcome
rapidly available Ke0
Direction
lowere0
Value
12 0%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, rapidly available K was 12 0% lower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 250–294 · show in text ↑
t0

“rape and cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The cropping pattern yielded 84 5% more net profit than one spring cotton crop.

Treatment
rape and cottont0
Outcome
net profite0
Direction
gainede0
Value
84 5%e0
Comparator
one spring cotton pae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The net profit from the cropping pattem mentioned above was gained by 84 5% compared with one spring cotton pa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 296–406 · show in text ↑
t0

“rape and cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–60 · show in text ↑

Brassica napus · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

transplanting · nutrient: content · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

transplanting · nutrient: content · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.