Paper · 2011 · Plant Nutrition and Fertilizing Science

Effects of rotation and intercropping systems on yield,quality of flue-cured tobacco and soil nutrients

Ling Yuan

7
claims
16
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A continuous 6-year field experiment was carried out to study the yield,chemical components,Bacterial Wilt Disease,output value of flue-cured tobacco and soil nutrients in representative yellow soil in south of Guizhou province.Three cropping systems were adopted: single tobacco cropping,tobacco and sweet potato intercropping and tobacco and peanut intercropping.Regarding to the intercropping systems,a new cultivation was established,which was intercropping in one year and changing the cropping area(rotation) next year.The results show that tobacco yield and output are significant increased by about 11.3% and 20.4% under the two intercropping systems from 2004 to 2009,respectively,and as well as the low disease rate of bacterial wilt disease that have decreased by about 11.0% compared to the single tobacco cropping system and the coordinated tobacco chemical constitutions in the two intercropping systems.As to soil nutrients,after 6 years cultivation,there are no significant differences in soil pH,organic matter and total nutrients(N,P and K) under the cropping systems.However,interesting to note is that the proportions of soil available nutrients under single tobacco cropping system are higher than those in the intercropping systems,which reflects unbalanced absorptions of soil nutrients.Yet,it is obvious that the intercropping systems could make good use of soil nutrients and keep a reasonable proportion of soil available nutrients that could meet the vast need of available N of tobacco at the earlier stage,but also prevent from assimilation of redundant nutrients later.Therefore,the intercropping systems with sweet potato(or peanut)could do great effort to decrease the harm of continuous cropping obstacles and will be popularized in south of Guizhou province.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tobacco yield increased by about 11.3% under the two intercropping systems (2004-2009) relative to single tobacco cropping.

Taxon
flue-cured tobaccot0
Treatment
two intercropping systemse0
Outcome
tobacco yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
11.3%e0
Comparator
single tobacco cropping systeme1

Verbatim

t0

“flue-cured tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–84 · show in text ↑
e0

“tobacco yield and output are significant increased by about 11.3% and 20.4% under the two intercropping systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 547–658 · show in text ↑
e1

“compared to the single tobacco cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 787–833 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tobacco output value increased by about 20.4% under the two intercropping systems (2004-2009) relative to single tobacco cropping.

Taxon
flue-cured tobaccot0
Treatment
two intercropping systemse0
Outcome
outpute0
Direction
increasede0
Value
20.4%e0
Comparator
single tobacco cropping systeme1

Verbatim

t0

“flue-cured tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–84 · show in text ↑
e0

“tobacco yield and output are significant increased by about 11.3% and 20.4% under the two intercropping systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 547–658 · show in text ↑
e1

“compared to the single tobacco cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 787–833 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial wilt disease rate decreased by about 11.0% under the intercropping systems relative to single tobacco cropping.

Taxon
flue-cured tobaccot0
Treatment
two intercropping systemse0
Outcome
disease rate of bacterial wilt diseasee0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
11.0%e0
Comparator
single tobacco cropping systeme0

Verbatim

t0

“flue-cured tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–84 · show in text ↑
e0

“tobacco yield and output are significant increased by about 11.3% and 20.4% under the two intercropping systems from 2004 to 2009,respectively,and as well as the low disease rate of bacterial wilt disease that have decreased by about 11.0% compared to the single tobacco cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 547–833 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tobacco chemical constitutions were coordinated in the two intercropping systems.

Taxon
flue-cured tobaccot0
Treatment
two intercropping systemse0
Outcome
coordinated tobacco chemical constitutionse0

Verbatim

t0

“flue-cured tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–84 · show in text ↑
e0

“the coordinated tobacco chemical constitutions in the two intercropping systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 838–917 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

After 6 years there were no significant differences in soil pH, organic matter and total N, P and K between the cropping systems.

Taxon
flue-cured tobaccot0
Treatment
cropping systemse0
Outcome
soil pH,organic matter and total nutrients(N,P and K)e0
Direction
no significant differencese0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“flue-cured tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–84 · show in text ↑
e0

“there are no significant differences in soil pH,organic matter and total nutrients(N,P and K) under the cropping systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 965–1085 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The proportions of soil available nutrients were higher under single tobacco cropping than under the intercropping systems.

Taxon
flue-cured tobaccot0
Treatment
single tobacco cropping systeme0
Outcome
proportions of soil available nutrientse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
intercropping systemse0

Verbatim

t0

“flue-cured tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–84 · show in text ↑
e0

“the proportions of soil available nutrients under single tobacco cropping system are higher than those in the intercropping systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1122–1253 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend popularizing intercropping with sweet potato or peanut in south Guizhou to reduce continuous cropping obstacles.

Taxon
flue-cured tobaccot0
Treatment
intercropping systems with sweet potato(or peanut)e0
Outcome
decrease the harm of continuous cropping obstaclese0
Setting
south of Guizhou provincee0

Verbatim

t0

“flue-cured tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–84 · show in text ↑
e0

“the intercropping systems with sweet potato(or peanut)could do great effort to decrease the harm of continuous cropping obstacles and will be popularized in south of Guizhou province”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1609–1791 · show in text ↑

intercropping · yield · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 17 positive, 3 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

intercropping · disease · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.