Paper · 2009 · Guizhou nongye kexue

The effect of intercropping between tobacco and sweet clover on tobacco yield and grade.

Tang Shi-kai; Lifang Liu; Yongmei Li

5
claims
12
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The plot test was used in intercropping between tobacco and sweet clover to study the effect on tobacco yield and grade. The results showed that there was no significantly difference in tobacco yield between intercropping and single cropping but the first grade and second grade increased by 6.9% to 28.0% and 11.7% to 29.3%, and the lower grade decreased by 27.68% to 53.2% compared with single cropping respectively. The tobacco external quality with intercropping pattern was improved to a certain degree.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tobacco yield did not differ significantly between intercropping with sweet clover and single cropping.

Treatment
intercropping between tobacco and sweet clovert0
Outcome
tobacco yielde0
Direction
no_changeinferrede0
Comparator
single croppinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“intercropping between tobacco and sweet clover on tobacco yield and grade”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–87 · show in text ↑
e0

“there was no significantly difference in tobacco yield between intercropping and single cropping”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 145–241 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

First grade tobacco increased by 6.9% to 28.0% under intercropping compared with single cropping.

Treatment
intercropping between tobacco and sweet clovert0
Outcome
first gradee1
Direction
increasede1
Value
6.9% to 28.0%e1
Comparator
single croppinge2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“intercropping between tobacco and sweet clover on tobacco yield and grade”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–87 · show in text ↑
e1

“the first grade and second grade increased by 6.9% to 28.0% and 11.7% to 29.3%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 246–324 · show in text ↑
e2

“the lower grade decreased by 27.68% to 53.2% compared with single cropping respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 330–417 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Second grade tobacco increased by 11.7% to 29.3% under intercropping compared with single cropping.

Treatment
intercropping between tobacco and sweet clovert0
Outcome
second gradee1
Direction
increasede1
Value
11.7% to 29.3%e1
Comparator
single croppinge2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“intercropping between tobacco and sweet clover on tobacco yield and grade”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–87 · show in text ↑
e1

“the first grade and second grade increased by 6.9% to 28.0% and 11.7% to 29.3%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 246–324 · show in text ↑
e2

“the lower grade decreased by 27.68% to 53.2% compared with single cropping respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 330–417 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower grade tobacco decreased by 27.68% to 53.2% under intercropping compared with single cropping.

Treatment
intercropping between tobacco and sweet clovert0
Outcome
lower gradee2
Direction
decreasede2
Value
27.68% to 53.2%e2
Comparator
single croppinge2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“intercropping between tobacco and sweet clover on tobacco yield and grade”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–87 · show in text ↑
e2

“the lower grade decreased by 27.68% to 53.2% compared with single cropping respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 330–417 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping with sweet clover improved tobacco external quality to a certain degree.

Treatment
intercropping patterne3
Outcome
The tobacco external qualitye3
Direction
improvede3
Qualifier
to a certain degreee3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“intercropping between tobacco and sweet clover on tobacco yield and grade”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–87 · show in text ↑
e3

“The tobacco external quality with intercropping pattern was improved to a certain degree”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 419–507 · show in text ↑

intercropping · yield · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 17 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

intercropping · quality: general · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.