Paper · 2015 · Agrochemicals

Influences of Spray Method and Tank-mix Adjuvant on Pymetrozine against Aphis gossypii in Cotton Fields

Dong Hong-qian

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

[Aims] This study aims to adopt the fan-shaped spray technology in the field trials for controlling outbreak of Aphis gossypii to reduce the dose of acetamiprid and water. [Methods] Using single factor randomized block design of experiment, the control experiments were conducted based on two field spray and tank-mix adjuvant. [Results] The field result indicated that the control effect of A. gossypii reached 95.2% after 3 days and 98.6% after 7 days using the fan-shaped nozzles when the spray volume maintained and water volume decreased by 50%; the effect against A. gossypii was above 97.1% after 3 days and 100% after 7 days when added the tank-mix adjuvant into pymetrozine with the decrease of 20% spray volume. [Conclusions] The fan-shaped nozzles instead of conical nozzles improved the effect of the liquid atomization, could save water 50% in production. Tank-mix adjuvant increased the surface tension of the acetamiprid solutions on the leaves and acetamiprid was reduced by 20%.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fan-shaped nozzles with 50% less water gave 95.2% aphid control after 3 days.

Treatment
fan-shaped nozzlese0
Interactor
A. gossypiiAphis gossypiie0pest
Outcome
control effect of A. gossypiie0
Direction
reachede0
Value
95.2%e0
Qualifier
after 3 dayse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Aphis gossypii
Aphis gossypii · InteractorDr Lewis Wilson, CSIRO · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the control effect of A. gossypii reached 95.2% after 3 days and 98.6% after 7 days using the fan-shaped nozzles when the spray volume maintained and water volume decreased by 50%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 370–549 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fan-shaped nozzles with 50% less water gave 98.6% aphid control after 7 days.

Treatment
fan-shaped nozzlese0
Interactor
A. gossypiiAphis gossypiie0pest
Outcome
control effect of A. gossypiie0
Direction
reachede0
Value
98.6%e0
Qualifier
after 7 dayse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Aphis gossypii
Aphis gossypii · InteractorDr Lewis Wilson, CSIRO · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the control effect of A. gossypii reached 95.2% after 3 days and 98.6% after 7 days using the fan-shaped nozzles when the spray volume maintained and water volume decreased by 50%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 370–549 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adjuvant with reduced pymetrozine spray volume gave above 97.1% aphid control after 3 days.

Treatment
tank-mix adjuvant into pymetrozinee0
Interactor
A. gossypiiAphis gossypiie0pest
Outcome
effect against A. gossypiie0
Direction
abovee0
Value
97.1%e0
Qualifier
after 3 dayse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Aphis gossypii
Aphis gossypii · InteractorDr Lewis Wilson, CSIRO · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the effect against A. gossypii was above 97.1% after 3 days and 100% after 7 days when added the tank-mix adjuvant into pymetrozine with the decrease of 20% spray volume”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 551–720 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adjuvant with reduced pymetrozine spray volume gave 100% aphid control after 7 days.

Treatment
tank-mix adjuvant into pymetrozinee0
Interactor
A. gossypiiAphis gossypiie0pest
Outcome
effect against A. gossypiie0
Value
100%e0
Qualifier
after 7 dayse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Aphis gossypii
Aphis gossypii · InteractorDr Lewis Wilson, CSIRO · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the effect against A. gossypii was above 97.1% after 3 days and 100% after 7 days when added the tank-mix adjuvant into pymetrozine with the decrease of 20% spray volume”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 551–720 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fan-shaped nozzles improved liquid atomization compared with conical nozzles.

Treatment
fan-shaped nozzlese0
Outcome
liquid atomizatione0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
conical nozzlese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The fan-shaped nozzles instead of conical nozzles improved the effect of the liquid atomization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 736–831 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–96 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Fan-shaped nozzles could save 50% of water in production.

Outcome
save watere0
Value
50%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“could save water 50% in production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 833–867 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tank-mix adjuvant increased surface tension of acetamiprid solution on leaves.

Treatment
Tank-mix adjuvante0
Outcome
surface tension of the acetamiprid solutions on the leavese0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tank-mix adjuvant increased the surface tension of the acetamiprid solutions on the leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 869–959 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–96 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Acetamiprid use was reduced by 20%.

Outcome
acetamipride0
Direction
reducede0
Value
20%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“acetamiprid was reduced by 20%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 964–994 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–96 · show in text ↑

adjuvant · Aphis gossypii · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

pymetrozine · Aphis gossypii · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.