Paper · 2015

Control Efficacy of Mancozeb against Potato Late Blight

LI Ya-hon

5
claims
9
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

[Objective]The aim was to screen out efficient,safe and economic agents for controlling potato late blight. [Method]Control efficacy of Mancozeb against potato late blight under different dosage,different formulations and different applied times was studied and demonstration was carried out,and then comparison tests were carried out with protective fungicides( Propineb and Oxine-copper) and several re preparations. [Result] The control efficacy of Mancozeb of different formulations had no difference,but increased with the increase of applied times. After potato late blight occurred,protective fungicides had no control efficacy basically. The combination of two times 70% Propineb WP and two times 68. 7% Fluopicolide SC was suitable,and the combination of two times 70% Propineb WP and three times 68. 7% Fluopicolide SC had the best control efficacy. [Conclusion] The results provide reference for control of potato late blight.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mancozeb formulations did not differ in late blight control efficacy.

Treatment
Mancozebe0
Outcome
control efficacye0
Direction
no differencee0
Comparator
different formulationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The control efficacy of Mancozeb of different formulations had no difference”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 428–504 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato Late Blight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–55 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mancozeb control efficacy increased with more applications.

Treatment
Mancozebe0
Outcome
control efficacye0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The control efficacy of Mancozeb of different formulations had no difference,but increased with the increase of applied times.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 428–554 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato Late Blight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–55 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Protective fungicides had essentially no control efficacy after potato late blight appeared.

Treatment
protective fungicidese0
Outcome
control efficacye0
Direction
no control efficacye0
Qualifier
After potato late blight occurrede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“After potato late blight occurred,protective fungicides had no control efficacy basically.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 555–645 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Two applications each of 70% Propineb WP and 68. 7% Fluopicolide SC were considered suitable.

Outcome
combination of two times 70% Propineb WP and two times 68. 7% Fluopicolide SC was suitablee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The combination of two times 70% Propineb WP and two times 68. 7% Fluopicolide SC was suitable”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 646–740 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato Late Blight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–55 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two applications of 70% Propineb WP plus three of 68. 7% Fluopicolide SC had the best control efficacy.

Treatment
combination of two times 70% Propineb WP and three times 68. 7% Fluopicolide SCe0
Outcome
control efficacye0
Direction
beste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the combination of two times 70% Propineb WP and three times 68. 7% Fluopicolide SC had the best control efficacy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 745–858 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato Late Blight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–55 · show in text ↑

mancozeb · control · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 14 positive, 1 negative or no effect

14 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

propineb · control · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

fluopicolide · control · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

fungicide · control · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 16 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.