Paper · 2006

Application of Triasulfuron to Control Weeds in Wheat Fields and Its Residue Effect on After-reap Crops

Fan Cui-qin

13
claims
13
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Field experiment was conducted to study weeds control efficacy of triasulfuron spraying in regreening stage of winter wheat and its residue effect on the growth and yield of after-reap crops(corn,soybean,peanut,millet and rape) under different moulds of tillage in wheat summer seeding crop two-crop per annual region of Hebei.The results showed that 10% triasulfuron WP had better control efficacy on broad-leaves weeds of wheat field and no influence on wheat yield.The application rate of 60 g/ha in wheat field had no influence on the growth of seedling and yield of corn and millet,and had light harm on soybean,peanut and rape.The hazard became heavier along with the increase of application rate,480 g/ha treatment heavier harm on all testing after-reap crops.Different crops had different sensibility to triasulfuron residue in the soil,the sensitivity order was rapesoybeanpeanutmilletcorn.Comparing with zero-tillage rotary tillage before sowing had less influence on seedling growth of all testing affer-reap crops and yield of soybean and rape.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Triasulfuron controlled broad-leaved weeds in wheat fields.

Treatment
10% triasulfuron WPe0
Interactor
broad-leaves weedse0weed
Outcome
control efficacy on broad-leaves weedse0
Direction
bettere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“10% triasulfuron WP had better control efficacy on broad-leaves weeds of wheat field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 351–435 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Triasulfuron did not influence wheat yield.

Treatment
10% triasulfuron WPe0
Outcome
wheat yielde0
Direction
no influencee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“10% triasulfuron WP had better control efficacy on broad-leaves weeds of wheat field and no influence on wheat yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 351–467 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 60 g/ha, triasulfuron did not affect corn seedling growth and yield.

Treatment
60 g/hae0
Outcome
growth of seedling and yielde0
Direction
no influencee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application rate of 60 g/ha in wheat field had no influence on the growth of seedling and yield of corn and millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 468–586 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 60 g/ha, triasulfuron did not affect millet seedling growth and yield.

Taxon
millete0
Treatment
60 g/hae0
Outcome
growth of seedling and yielde0
Direction
no influencee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The application rate of 60 g/ha in wheat field had no influence on the growth of seedling and yield of corn and millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 468–586 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 60 g/ha, triasulfuron lightly harmed soybean.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
60 g/hae0
Outcome
light harme0
Direction
light harme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application rate of 60 g/ha in wheat field had no influence on the growth of seedling and yield of corn and millet,and had light harm on soybean,peanut and rape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 468–632 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 60 g/ha, triasulfuron lightly harmed peanut.

Treatment
60 g/hae0
Outcome
light harme0
Direction
light harme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application rate of 60 g/ha in wheat field had no influence on the growth of seedling and yield of corn and millet,and had light harm on soybean,peanut and rape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 468–632 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 60 g/ha, triasulfuron lightly harmed rape.

Treatment
60 g/hae0
Outcome
light harme0
Direction
light harme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application rate of 60 g/ha in wheat field had no influence on the growth of seedling and yield of corn and millet,and had light harm on soybean,peanut and rape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 468–632 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing triasulfuron application rate increased hazard to the following crops.

Treatment
application ratee0
Outcome
hazarde0
Direction
heaviere0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The hazard became heavier along with the increase of application rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 633–702 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 480 g/ha treatment caused heavier harm to all tested after-reap crops.

Taxon
after-reap cropse0
Treatment
480 g/ha treatmente0
Outcome
harme0
Direction
heaviere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“480 g/ha treatment heavier harm on all testing after-reap crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 703–766 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sensitivity to triasulfuron residue differed among crops in the order rape, soybean, peanut, millet, corn.

Taxon
cropse0
Outcome
sensitivity ordere0
Qualifier
rapesoybeanpeanutmilletcorne0

Verbatim

e0

“Different crops had different sensibility to triasulfuron residue in the soil,the sensitivity order was rapesoybeanpeanutmilletcorn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 767–898 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rotary tillage had less effect on seedling growth of the tested after-reap crops than zero tillage.

Taxon
affer-reap cropse0
Treatment
rotary tillagee0
Outcome
seedling growthe0
Direction
less influencee0
Comparator
zero-tillagee0

Verbatim

e0

“Comparing with zero-tillage rotary tillage before sowing had less influence on seedling growth of all testing affer-reap crops and yield of soybean and rape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 899–1055 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rotary tillage had less effect on soybean yield than zero tillage.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
rotary tillagee0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
less influencee0
Comparator
zero-tillagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Comparing with zero-tillage rotary tillage before sowing had less influence on seedling growth of all testing affer-reap crops and yield of soybean and rape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 899–1055 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rotary tillage had less effect on rape yield than zero tillage.

Treatment
rotary tillagee0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
less influencee0
Comparator
zero-tillagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Comparing with zero-tillage rotary tillage before sowing had less influence on seedling growth of all testing affer-reap crops and yield of soybean and rape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 899–1055 · show in text ↑

triasulfuron · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

triasulfuron · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 9 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

tillage · yield · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

50 papers: 42 positive, 8 negative or no effect

41 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

46 papers more in this group

See all 50 papers →

tillage · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

390 papers: 264 positive, 126 negative or no effect

263 papers in the same direction as this paper · 100 in the opposite direction · 26 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

386 papers more in this group

See all 390 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.