Paper · 2011 · Xibei nongye xuebao

Controlling Effects of Several Fungicides against Apple Leaf Spot

Junxia Jiang

6
claims
13
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Based on the field experiments of 2009-2010 and mycelia growth rate bioassay in laboratory of 2010,the effects of seven fungicides against Alternaria mali Roberts were evaluated.The results indicated that all the tested fungicides showed good effects against the Alternaria mali Roberts with the recommended concentrations in the field or bioassay experiments.Among them,triazole fungicides,such as tebuconazole and difenoconazole had the best inhibitory effects,EC50 values were 1.49 and1.98μg/g,respectively;mancozeb and propineb had less inhibitions on Alternaria mali Roberts,EC50 values were 19.7 and 24.7μg/g,respectively.The results of two years field trials showed triazole fungicides,such as tebuconazole and difenoconazole had significant control effects against the tested pathogenic bacteria with the efficiency of about 85% in spring and autumn tips stage;strobilurin,such as kresoxim-methyl and the antibiotic fungicides of polyoxin and ningnanmycin indicated good effect with the inhabitation rate about80%;the traditional fungicides,such as mancozeb and propineb exhibited low effects against the tested pathogenic bacteria with the inhabitation rate about75%.All these fungicides had no adverse effects on apple tree growth and can be used safely.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Triazole fungicides tebuconazole and difenoconazole had the best inhibitory effects on Alternaria mali, with EC50 values of 1.49 and 1.98 μg/g.

Treatment
tebuconazole and difenoconazolee1
Interactor
Alternaria mali RobertsAlternaria malie0pathogen
Outcome
inhibitory effectse1
Direction
beste1
Value
1.49 and1.98μg/ge1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Alternaria mali
Alternaria mali · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAfroBrazilian · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“against Apple Leaf Spot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–65 · show in text ↑
e0

“the effects of seven fungicides against Alternaria mali Roberts were evaluated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 99–177 · show in text ↑
e1

“triazole fungicides,such as tebuconazole and difenoconazole had the best inhibitory effects,EC50 values were 1.49 and1.98μg/g”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 371–496 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mancozeb and propineb had weaker inhibition of Alternaria mali than the triazole fungicides, with EC50 values of 19.7 and 24.7 μg/g.

Treatment
mancozeb and propinebe2
Interactor
Alternaria mali RobertsAlternaria malie2pathogen
Outcome
inhibitionse2
Direction
lesse2
Value
19.7 and 24.7μg/ge2
Comparator
tebuconazole and difenoconazolee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Alternaria mali
Alternaria mali · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAfroBrazilian · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“against Apple Leaf Spot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–65 · show in text ↑
e1

“triazole fungicides,such as tebuconazole and difenoconazole had the best inhibitory effects”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 371–462 · show in text ↑
e2

“mancozeb and propineb had less inhibitions on Alternaria mali Roberts,EC50 values were 19.7 and 24.7μg/g”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 510–614 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In two years of field trials, tebuconazole and difenoconazole gave significant control of the pathogen, about 85% efficiency at spring and autumn tip stages.

Treatment
triazole fungicides,such as tebuconazole and difenoconazolee3
Interactor
tested pathogenic bacteriae3pathogen
Outcome
control effectse3
Direction
significante3
Value
about 85%e3
Setting
two years field trialse3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“against Apple Leaf Spot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–65 · show in text ↑
e3

“The results of two years field trials showed triazole fungicides,such as tebuconazole and difenoconazole had significant control effects against the tested pathogenic bacteria with the efficiency of about 85% in spring and autumn tips stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 628–868 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Strobilurin kresoxim-methyl and the antibiotic fungicides polyoxin and ningnanmycin gave good control, with inhibition rate about 80%.

Treatment
strobilurin,such as kresoxim-methyl and the antibiotic fungicides of polyoxin and ningnanmycine4
Outcome
inhabitation ratee4
Direction
good effecte4
Value
about80%e4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“against Apple Leaf Spot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–65 · show in text ↑
e4

“strobilurin,such as kresoxim-methyl and the antibiotic fungicides of polyoxin and ningnanmycin indicated good effect with the inhabitation rate about80%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 869–1021 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Traditional fungicides mancozeb and propineb showed low control of the pathogen, with inhibition rate about 75%.

Treatment
mancozeb and propinebe5
Interactor
tested pathogenic bacteriae5pathogen
Outcome
inhabitation ratee5
Direction
lowe5
Value
about75%e5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“against Apple Leaf Spot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–65 · show in text ↑
e5

“the traditional fungicides,such as mancozeb and propineb exhibited low effects against the tested pathogenic bacteria with the inhabitation rate about75%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1022–1175 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All the tested fungicides had no adverse effect on apple tree growth.

Taxon
apple treeMalus domesticae6
Treatment
All these fungicidese6
Outcome
apple tree growthe6
Direction
no adverse effectse6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“All these fungicides had no adverse effects on apple tree growth and can be used safely”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1176–1263 · show in text ↑

difenoconazole · control · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

tebuconazole · control · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

fungicide · growth · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 6 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.