Paper · 2012 · Tobacco Science & Technology

Influences of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi on Phosphorus Content in Tobacco Planting Soil and Nutrition Absorption of Flue-cured Tobacco Plants

Juan Yao; Maosheng Wang; Wang Feng; et al.

7
claims
10
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In order to study the mycorrhizal effects of mycorrhizal seedling after transplanting,three nitrogen(N) levels,45,67.5 and 90 kg/ha,were applied in field experiments and the effects of mycorrhizal seedlings on phosphorus(P) content in soil and N and P absorption of plants at fast growing stage were studied.The results showed that: 1) The effects of Arbuscular mycorrhizal(AM) fungus inoculating on the P content in tobacco planting soil and tobacco plants were insignificant at the N application level of 45 and 67.5 kg/ha,however,P content would be effectively improved at the level of 90 kg/ha.2) The N contents in tobacco root,stem and leaves were remarkably decreased by Glamus mosseae(Gm01)inoculating at different N application levels,but,Glamus mosseae(Gm02)inoculating was remarkable only at the application level of 90 kg/ha.3) The N/P ratio in tobacco was effectively decreased by AM fungus inoculating at different N levels,however,Glamus mosseae(Gm01)inoculation was more effective.It indicated that N application would affect the mycorrhizal effects of AM fungi,but the effects of Glamus mosseae from different origin differed to a certain extent.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

AM fungus inoculation had insignificant effects on P content at 45 and 67.5 kg/ha N.

Treatment
Arbuscular mycorrhizal(AM) fungus inoculatinge0
Interactor
Arbuscular mycorrhizal(AM) funguse0symbiont
Outcome
P content in tobacco planting soil and tobacco plantse0
Qualifier
45 and 67.5 kg/hae0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effects of Arbuscular mycorrhizal(AM) fungus inoculating on the P content in tobacco planting soil and tobacco plants were insignificant at the N application level of 45 and 67.5 kg/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 336–524 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AM fungus inoculation improved P content at 90 kg/ha N.

Treatment
Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungit0
Interactor
Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungit0symbiont
Outcome
P contente0
Direction
improvede0
Qualifier
90 kg/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“P content would be effectively improved at the level of 90 kg/ha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 533–598 · show in text ↑
t0

“Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi on Phosphorus Content in Tobacco Planting Soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gm01 inoculation markedly decreased N in tobacco roots, stems and leaves across N levels.

Organ / stage
root,stem and leavese0
Treatment
Glamus mosseae(Gm01)inoculatinge0
Interactor
Glamus mosseae(Gm01)e0symbiont
Outcome
N contentse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The N contents in tobacco root,stem and leaves were remarkably decreased by Glamus mosseae(Gm01)inoculating at different N application levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 601–742 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gm02 inoculation markedly decreased N at 90 kg/ha N.

Treatment
Glamus mosseae(Gm02)inoculatinge0
Interactor
Glamus mosseae(Gm02)e0symbiont
Outcome
N contentse0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
90 kg/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The N contents in tobacco root,stem and leaves were remarkably decreased by Glamus mosseae(Gm01)inoculating at different N application levels,but,Glamus mosseae(Gm02)inoculating was remarkable only at the application level of 90 kg/ha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 601–836 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AM fungus inoculation decreased tobacco N/P ratio across N levels.

Treatment
AM fungus inoculatinge0
Interactor
AM funguse0symbiont
Outcome
N/P ratioe0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The N/P ratio in tobacco was effectively decreased by AM fungus inoculating at different N levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 839–936 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gm01 inoculation was more effective in reducing N/P ratio.

Treatment
Glamus mosseae(Gm01)inoculatione0
Interactor
Glamus mosseae(Gm01)e0symbiont
Outcome
more effectivee0
Direction
more effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Glamus mosseae(Gm01)inoculation was more effective.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 945–996 · show in text ↑
t0

“Nutrition Absorption of Flue-cured Tobacco Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–143 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N application affected AM fungal effects, which differed by G. mosseae origin.

Treatment
N applicatione0
Interactor
AM fungiGlomeromycotae0symbiont
Outcome
mycorrhizal effects of AM fungie0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N application would affect the mycorrhizal effects of AM fungi,but the effects of Glamus mosseae from different origin differed to a certain extent.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1014–1162 · show in text ↑
t0

“Nutrition Absorption of Flue-cured Tobacco Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–143 · show in text ↑

mycorrhiza · nutrient: content · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

inoculation · nutrient: content · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

30 papers: 27 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 27 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.