Paper · 2003 · Xibei zhiwu xuebao

Effect of compound fertilizers on growth physiology and fruit quality of nectarines and grapes

Wan Yi

13
claims
16
verbatim quotes
0
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In some areas of North China,availabilities of minor elements are too low to supply for satisfactory growth of fruit trees because of high pH in soil,which caused some serious disorders in fruit trees.Growers tried to solve these problems by soil fertilizing directly or fertilizing with irrigation water.But these methods had little effect for the nutrient elements were quickly fixed by soil after fertilizing.It took the author five years to compound foliar fertilizers for the fruit trees in these areas.The compound fertilizers content minor elements,a few organic nutrients as well as major elements and the fertilizers have different formulas according to habit of the different kinds of the fruit trees.Chlorophyll contents,nitrate reductase activity,iron content and zinc content in the leaves were significantly increased after 72 h after nectarine trees and grapevines sprayed with fertilizers.The fertilizers could also improve fruit qualities of nectarines and grapes;increase bud weight of grape shoots but had no effect on vigorousness of grapevines.Spayed with the compound fertilizers is beneficial to the trees all the year round,the interval of the sprays being not less than 7 to 10 days.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Compound fertilizer increased leaf chlorophyll content in nectarine trees.

Treatment
sprayed with fertilizerse0
Outcome
Chlorophyll contentse0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
after 72 he0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica var. nucipersica
Prunus persica var. nucipersica · Taxon · picture of the speciesAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chlorophyll contents,nitrate reductase activity,iron content and zinc content in the leaves were significantly increased after 72 h after nectarine trees and grapevines sprayed with fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–904 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Compound fertilizer increased leaf nitrate reductase activity in nectarine trees.

Treatment
sprayed with fertilizerse0
Outcome
nitrate reductase activitye0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
after 72 he0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica var. nucipersica
Prunus persica var. nucipersica · Taxon · picture of the speciesAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chlorophyll contents,nitrate reductase activity,iron content and zinc content in the leaves were significantly increased after 72 h after nectarine trees and grapevines sprayed with fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–904 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Compound fertilizer increased leaf iron content in nectarine trees.

Treatment
sprayed with fertilizerse0
Outcome
iron contente0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
after 72 he0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica var. nucipersica
Prunus persica var. nucipersica · Taxon · picture of the speciesAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chlorophyll contents,nitrate reductase activity,iron content and zinc content in the leaves were significantly increased after 72 h after nectarine trees and grapevines sprayed with fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–904 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Compound fertilizer increased leaf zinc content in nectarine trees.

Treatment
sprayed with fertilizerse0
Outcome
zinc contente0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
after 72 he0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica var. nucipersica
Prunus persica var. nucipersica · Taxon · picture of the speciesAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chlorophyll contents,nitrate reductase activity,iron content and zinc content in the leaves were significantly increased after 72 h after nectarine trees and grapevines sprayed with fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–904 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Compound fertilizer increased leaf chlorophyll content in grapevines.

Taxon
grapevinesVitise0
Treatment
sprayed with fertilizerse0
Outcome
Chlorophyll contentse0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
after 72 he0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chlorophyll contents,nitrate reductase activity,iron content and zinc content in the leaves were significantly increased after 72 h after nectarine trees and grapevines sprayed with fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–904 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Compound fertilizer increased leaf nitrate reductase activity in grapevines.

Taxon
grapevinesVitise0
Treatment
sprayed with fertilizerse0
Outcome
nitrate reductase activitye0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
after 72 he0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chlorophyll contents,nitrate reductase activity,iron content and zinc content in the leaves were significantly increased after 72 h after nectarine trees and grapevines sprayed with fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–904 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Compound fertilizer increased leaf iron content in grapevines.

Taxon
grapevinesVitise0
Treatment
sprayed with fertilizerse0
Outcome
iron contente0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
after 72 he0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chlorophyll contents,nitrate reductase activity,iron content and zinc content in the leaves were significantly increased after 72 h after nectarine trees and grapevines sprayed with fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–904 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Compound fertilizer increased leaf zinc content in grapevines.

Taxon
grapevinesVitise0
Treatment
sprayed with fertilizerse0
Outcome
zinc contente0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
after 72 he0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chlorophyll contents,nitrate reductase activity,iron content and zinc content in the leaves were significantly increased after 72 h after nectarine trees and grapevines sprayed with fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–904 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The fertilizer improved nectarine fruit quality.

Treatment
fertilizerse0
Outcome
fruit qualitiese0
Direction
improvee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica var. nucipersica
Prunus persica var. nucipersica · Taxon · picture of the speciesAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The fertilizers could also improve fruit qualities of nectarines and grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 905–980 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The fertilizer improved grape fruit quality.

Taxon
grapese0
Treatment
fertilizerse0
Outcome
fruit qualitiese0
Direction
improvee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The fertilizers could also improve fruit qualities of nectarines and grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 905–980 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The fertilizer increased grape shoot bud weight.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
fertilizerse1
Outcome
bud weighte0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“increase bud weight of grape shoots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 981–1016 · show in text ↑
e1

“grapevines sprayed with fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 869–904 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The fertilizer did not affect grapevine vigorousness.

Taxon
grapevinesVitise0
Treatment
fertilizerse1
Outcome
vigorousnesse0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“had no effect on vigorousness of grapevines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1021–1064 · show in text ↑
e1

“grapevines sprayed with fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 869–904 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend compound fertilizer sprays no closer than 7 to 10 days apart.

Taxon
treese0
Treatment
compound fertilizerse0
Outcome
the interval of the sprays being not less than 7 to 10 dayse0

Verbatim

e0

“Spayed with the compound fertilizers is beneficial to the trees all the year round,the interval of the sprays being not less than 7 to 10 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1065–1207 · show in text ↑

fertilization · physiology: enzyme activity · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

fertilization · physiology: pigments · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

application · physiology: pigments · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 14 positive, 2 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

fertilization · physiology: pigments · VitisPositive and negative results

21 papers: 19 positive, 2 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

application · physiology: pigments · VitisPositive and negative results

22 papers: 21 positive, 1 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

application · nutrient: content · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 19 positive, 5 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 20 positive, 6 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

application · nutrient: content · VitisPositive and negative results

37 papers: 35 positive, 2 negative or no effect

34 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

33 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

8 of 12 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.