Abstract
The effects of plant growth regulator GGR 6 on cutting propagation of tea [Camellia sinensis(L.) O. Ktze.] plug seedling were studied by setting different treatment methods, treatment times and concentration of GGR6. The results showed that application of GGR6 growth regulator could increase the root rate and survival rate, promote the growth of root system and tea seeding. Slow soaking method was superior to quick dipping. Treatment of 50 mg / kg for 0.5 h was the optimal as the developed root system was better and the survival rate, stem diameter and seeding height was 86.33 %, 2.05 mm and167 mm, respectively.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
GGR6 increased rooting and survival of tea plug seedlings.
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“application of GGR6 growth regulator could increase the root rate and survival rate”
Claim · model-written summary
GGR6 promoted root and seedling growth.
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“promote the growth of root system and tea seeding”
t0“GGR 6”
Claim · model-written summary
Slow soaking was superior to quick dipping for tea cutting propagation.
- Taxon
- Camellia sinensis
Camellia sinensist0 - Treatment
- Slow soaking methode0
- Outcome
- superiore0
- Direction
- superiore0
- Comparator
- quick dippinge0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Slow soaking method was superior to quick dipping”
t0“Camellia sinensis”
Claim · model-written summary
Treatment at 50 mg / kg for 0.5 h was optimal for root development.
- Taxon
- Camellia sinensis
Camellia sinensist0 - Treatment
- 50 mg / kg for 0.5 he0
- Outcome
- developed root systeme0
- Direction
- bettere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Treatment of 50 mg / kg for 0.5 h was the optimal as the developed root system was better”
t0“Camellia sinensis”
Claim · model-written summary
The optimal treatment gave 86.33 % survival.
- Taxon
- Camellia sinensis
Camellia sinensist0 - Treatment
- 50 mg / kg for 0.5 he1
- Outcome
- survival ratee0
- Value
- 86.33 %e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“the survival rate, stem diameter and seeding height was 86.33 %, 2.05 mm and167 mm, respectively”
e1“Treatment of 50 mg / kg for 0.5 h”
t0“Camellia sinensis”
Claim · model-written summary
The optimal treatment gave 2.05 mm stem diameter.
- Taxon
- Camellia sinensis
Camellia sinensist0 - Outcome
- stem diametere0
- Value
- 2.05 mme0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“the survival rate, stem diameter and seeding height was 86.33 %, 2.05 mm and167 mm, respectively”
t0“Camellia sinensis”
Claim · model-written summary
The optimal treatment gave 167 mm seedling height.
- Taxon
- Camellia sinensis
Camellia sinensist0 - Outcome
- seeding heighte0
- Value
- 167 mme0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“the survival rate, stem diameter and seeding height was 86.33 %, 2.05 mm and167 mm, respectively”
t0“Camellia sinensis”
The same questions in other papers
class · survival · Camellia sinensis (black tea)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.