Paper · 1959 · Chagyo Kenkyu Hokoku (Tea Research Journal)

Studies on the Frost Damage on the Tea Plant (Part 4)

Tsuneji TAKAHASHI; Hideya AONO; Yoshimitsu YANASE

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
0
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

1. For researching the re-sprouting and development of the tea bud after frost damage, some experiment were performed in an artificial damage caused by taking off the bud by hand in 1957-1958. Especially the promoting effects of ammonium sulfate dressing and gibberellin spraying on the growth of, bud after the damage were investigated in 1958.2. There were two kinds of buds which appeared after been suffered from a slight damage, i.e., one developed from the survived bud, and the other from the lateral bud on the lower part of injured stem. Sometimes the adventitious bud on an old stem also developed in a heavy damage.3. The plucking date of the injured bush was delayed from 10 to 45 days than that of the uninjured. When injured at the 1-2 leaves-stage and the 3-4 leaves-stage, the plucking date was delayed to mid May and mid June respectively, the latter time was just prior to the second cropping of the uninjured. The later the time of injury, the less the yield and total nitrogen content in the leaves. The plucking date of the survived bud was not so delayed, that of the re-sprouting bud, however, was delayed afterward the second plucking of the uninjured.4. The treatments of ammonium sulfate dressing and of gibberellin spraying on the injured tea plant promoted the growth of the survived bud and prolonged the internodes of the second and third lateral buds, but did not almost increase the weight of leaves and number of leaves. While the effect of the treatments on the re-sprouting bud -was not remarkable.5. The plucking date of survived bud was hastened 2 days by gibberellin spraying and more 2 days by an additional ammonium sul-fate dressing, the total nitrogen content in the tea leaves, however, slightly decreased by gibberellin spraying.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Slight damage produced surviving and lateral buds; heavy damage sometimes produced adventitious buds.

Taxon
tea Plantt0
Treatment
damagee0
Outcome
budse0

Verbatim

e0

“There were two kinds of buds which appeared after been suffered from a slight damage, i.e., one developed from the survived bud, and the other from the lateral bud on the lower part of injured stem. Sometimes the adventitious bud on an old stem also developed in a heavy damage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 348–626 · show in text ↑
t0

“tea Plant”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 35–44 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Injury delayed plucking by 10 to 45 days.

Taxon
tea Plantt0
Treatment
injurede0
Outcome
plucking datee0
Direction
delayede0
Value
10 to 45 dayse0
Comparator
uninjurede0

Verbatim

e0

“The plucking date of the injured bush was delayed from 10 to 45 days than that of the uninjured.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 629–725 · show in text ↑
t0

“tea Plant”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 35–44 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Later injury reduced tea yield and leaf nitrogen content.

Taxon
tea Plantt0
Treatment
injurye0
Outcome
yield and total nitrogen content in the leavese0
Direction
lesse0

Verbatim

e0

“The later the time of injury, the less the yield and total nitrogen content in the leaves.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 929–1019 · show in text ↑
t0

“tea Plant”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 35–44 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ammonium sulfate dressing promoted surviving bud growth and lateral bud internode length.

Taxon
tea Plantt0
Treatment
ammonium sulfate dressinge0
Outcome
growth of the survived bud and prolonged the internodes of the second and third lateral budse0
Direction
promotede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The treatments of ammonium sulfate dressing and of gibberellin spraying on the injured tea plant promoted the growth of the survived bud and prolonged the internodes of the second and third lateral buds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1179–1381 · show in text ↑
t0

“tea Plant”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 35–44 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gibberellin spraying advanced surviving bud plucking by two days.

Taxon
tea Plantt0
Treatment
gibberellin sprayinge0
Outcome
plucking date of survived bude0
Direction
hastenede0
Value
2 dayse0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The plucking date of survived bud was hastened 2 days by gibberellin spraying”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1536–1613 · show in text ↑
t0

“tea Plant”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 35–44 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gibberellin spraying slightly reduced tea leaf nitrogen content.

Taxon
tea Plantt0
Treatment
gibberellin sprayinge0
Outcome
total nitrogen content in the tea leavese0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the total nitrogen content in the tea leaves, however, slightly decreased by gibberellin spraying”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1675–1772 · show in text ↑
t0

“tea Plant”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 35–44 · show in text ↑

application · nutrient: content · Camellia sinensis (black tea)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

class · survival · Camellia sinensis (black tea)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

application · survival · Camellia sinensis (black tea)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.