Paper · 2005 · Neimenggu Nong-Mu Xueyuan xuebao

RESEARCH OF METHODS ON RESISTANCE TO DOWNY MILDEW INDUCED WITH COPOLYMER OF CHLORINE AND POTASSIUM IONS IN CUCUMBER

Yun Xing-fu

6
claims
11
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The disease severity of Pseudoperonospora cubensis(Berk.et Curt.) Rostov decreased obviously when the cucumber seedlings were induced by copolymer of chlorine and potassium ions.The effects were influenced by different inducing methods. Four induced methods including root-drench,leave-spray,stem-injection and seed-soaking were used in this experiment. For the same method if the treat concentrations were different,the effects of immunity were different.In every method there were five different treat concentrations.The results showed:the effect of root-drench was the best, leave-spray was in the next place, stem-injection and seed-soaking were thirdly.Their mean relative immunization efficiency were 47.63%,28.92%,16.95% and 14.32% respectively. In the four method of root-drench leave-spray,stem-injection and seed-soaking the optimum inducing concentration were 1%,1% and 1.5%,2% and 8% respectively after the treatment of copolymer of chlorine and potassium ions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The copolymer reduced downy mildew severity in cucumber seedlings.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse0
Treatment
copolymer of chlorine and potassium ionse0
Interactor
Pseudoperonospora cubensis(Berk.et Curt.) RostovPseudoperonospora cubensise0pathogen
Outcome
disease severity of Pseudoperonospora cubensis(Berk.et Curt.) Rostove0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudoperonospora cubensis
Pseudoperonospora cubensis · InteractorChristian Hummert ( Ixitixel ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The disease severity of Pseudoperonospora cubensis(Berk.et Curt.) Rostov decreased obviously when the cucumber seedlings were induced by copolymer of chlorine and potassium ions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–177 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root drenching had the best mean relative immunization efficiency, 47.63%.

Taxon
CUCUMBERCucumis sativust0
Treatment
root-drenche0
Outcome
mean relative immunization efficiencye0
Direction
beste0
Value
47.63%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the effect of root-drench was the best, leave-spray was in the next place, stem-injection and seed-soaking were thirdly.Their mean relative immunization efficiency were 47.63%,28.92%,16.95% and 14.32% respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 538–751 · show in text ↑
t0

“CUCUMBER”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–115 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf spraying had 28.92% mean relative immunization efficiency.

Taxon
CUCUMBERCucumis sativust0
Treatment
leave-spraye0
Outcome
mean relative immunization efficiencye0
Direction
next placee0
Value
28.92%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“leave-spray was in the next place, stem-injection and seed-soaking were thirdly.Their mean relative immunization efficiency were 47.63%,28.92%,16.95% and 14.32% respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 578–751 · show in text ↑
t0

“CUCUMBER”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–115 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stem injection had 16.95% mean relative immunization efficiency.

Taxon
CUCUMBERCucumis sativust0
Treatment
stem-injectione0
Outcome
mean relative immunization efficiencye0
Direction
thirdlye0
Value
16.95%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“stem-injection and seed-soaking were thirdly.Their mean relative immunization efficiency were 47.63%,28.92%,16.95% and 14.32% respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 613–751 · show in text ↑
t0

“CUCUMBER”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–115 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed soaking had 14.32% mean relative immunization efficiency.

Taxon
CUCUMBERCucumis sativust0
Treatment
seed-soakinge0
Outcome
mean relative immunization efficiencye0
Direction
thirdlye0
Value
14.32%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seed-soaking were thirdly.Their mean relative immunization efficiency were 47.63%,28.92%,16.95% and 14.32% respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 632–751 · show in text ↑
t0

“CUCUMBER”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–115 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The stated optimum concentration for root drenching was 1%.

Taxon
CUCUMBERCucumis sativust0
Outcome
optimum inducing concentratione0
Value
1%e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the optimum inducing concentration were 1%,1% and 1.5%,2% and 8% respectively after the treatment of copolymer of chlorine and potassium ions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 831–972 · show in text ↑
t0

“CUCUMBER”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–115 · show in text ↑

potassium · Pseudoperonospora cubensis · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.