Paper · 2008

Propagating Technology by the Green Wood Cutting of Raspberry

Qi Chen

5
claims
11
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In the present experiment,the propagating ability of the green shoots taken from American No.22 and Blackberry A4-17 was studied.It was found that: the hemi-lignified canes as the cutting of American No.22 is the best wood.Rooting rate could reach more than 80%.Fast dipping with high concentration auxin is the better treatment of two raspberry varieties.Rooting rate could reach 80%~90% with the treatment of dealing with leaf stalk and soaking a little while the wood in high concentration auxin with 100~150 mg/L H2BO3.Rooting ability of Blackberry A4-17 is greater than that of American No.22.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hemi-lignified American No.22 canes were the best cuttings.

Taxon
Raspberryt0
Material
American No.22e0
Organ / stage
hemi-lignified canese0
Outcome
best woode0

Verbatim

e0

“the hemi-lignified canes as the cutting of American No.22 is the best wood”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 148–222 · show in text ↑
t0

“Raspberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–61 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rooting of American No.22 cuttings exceeded 80%.

Taxon
Raspberryt0
Material
American No.22e1
Outcome
Rooting ratee0
Direction
reache0
Value
more than 80%e0

Verbatim

e0

“Rooting rate could reach more than 80%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 223–261 · show in text ↑
e1

“American No.22 is the best wood”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 191–222 · show in text ↑
t0

“Raspberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fast dipping in high-concentration auxin was the better treatment for the two raspberry varieties.

Taxon
Raspberryt0
Treatment
Fast dipping with high concentration auxine0
Outcome
better treatmente0
Direction
bettere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Fast dipping with high concentration auxin is the better treatment of two raspberry varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 262–355 · show in text ↑
t0

“Raspberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf-stalk treatment and soaking cuttings in auxin with H2BO3 produced 80%–90% rooting.

Taxon
Raspberryt0
Treatment
dealing with leaf stalk and soaking a little while the wood in high concentration auxin with 100~150 mg/L H2BO3e0
Outcome
Rooting ratee0
Direction
reache0
Value
80%~90%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Rooting rate could reach 80%~90% with the treatment of dealing with leaf stalk and soaking a little while the wood in high concentration auxin with 100~150 mg/L H2BO3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 356–522 · show in text ↑
t0

“Raspberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–61 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Blackberry A4-17 rooted more readily than American No.22.

Taxon
Raspberryt0
Material
Blackberry A4-17e0
Outcome
Rooting abilitye0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
American No.22e0

Verbatim

e0

“Rooting ability of Blackberry A4-17 is greater than that of American No.22”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 523–597 · show in text ↑
t0

“Raspberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–61 · show in text ↑

class · growth · Rubus idaeus (red raspberry)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

application · growth · Rubus idaeus (red raspberry)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.