Abstract
The effects of 3 kinds of nitrification inhibitors application,Hydroquinone(HQ),Dicyandiamide(DCD) and Thiourea(TU),on yield and some nutrition qualities of pakchoi with plot experiment in 2 kinds of vegetable soils and at 2 kinds of growing seasons.The results demonstrated that 3 kinds of inhibitors,HQ,DCD and TU,all increased the yield of pakchoi to some extent,and of them DCD was the best.The yield of pakchoi in red vegetable soil was higher than that in alluvial vegetable soil.3 kinds of nitrification inhibitors could all increase N and P uptake obviously,while they did not affect K uptake by pakchoi.All the inhibitors could increase Vitamin C(Vc) contents of pakchoi,while only HQ and DCD increased the soluble sugar contents of pakchoi.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 11
Claim · model-written summary
Hydroquinone increased pakchoi yield.
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“3 kinds of inhibitors,HQ,DCD and TU,all increased the yield of pakchoi to some extent”
Claim · model-written summary
Dicyandiamide increased pakchoi yield and was the best inhibitor.
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“3 kinds of inhibitors,HQ,DCD and TU,all increased the yield of pakchoi to some extent,and of them DCD was the best”
Claim · model-written summary
Thiourea increased pakchoi yield.
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“3 kinds of inhibitors,HQ,DCD and TU,all increased the yield of pakchoi to some extent”
Claim · model-written summary
Pakchoi yield was higher in red than alluvial vegetable soil.
Verbatim
e0“The yield of pakchoi in red vegetable soil was higher than that in alluvial vegetable soil”
Claim · model-written summary
HQ increased pakchoi N and P uptake.
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“3 kinds of nitrification inhibitors could all increase N and P uptake obviously”
t0“Pakchoi”
Claim · model-written summary
DCD increased pakchoi N and P uptake.
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“3 kinds of nitrification inhibitors could all increase N and P uptake obviously”
t0“Pakchoi”
Claim · model-written summary
TU increased pakchoi N and P uptake.
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“3 kinds of nitrification inhibitors could all increase N and P uptake obviously”
t0“Pakchoi”
Claim · model-written summary
The three nitrification inhibitors did not affect pakchoi K uptake.
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“they did not affect K uptake by pakchoi”
Claim · model-written summary
All inhibitors increased pakchoi vitamin C content.
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“All the inhibitors could increase Vitamin C(Vc) contents of pakchoi”
Claim · model-written summary
HQ increased pakchoi soluble sugar content.
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“only HQ and DCD increased the soluble sugar contents of pakchoi”
Claim · model-written summary
DCD increased pakchoi soluble sugar content.
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“only HQ and DCD increased the soluble sugar contents of pakchoi”
The same questions in other papers
nitrification inhibitor · nutrient: content · Brassica rapa (field mustard)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
cyanoguanidine · yield · Brassica rapa (field mustard)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.