Abstract
Intercropping was a kind of planting mode which could intensively use light,heat,fertilizer,water and other natural resources.Different intercropping modes had different influence on the light energy utilization rate of crop group.Under the maize-soybean intercropping mode of 2∶ 2,2∶ 3 and 2∶ 4,taking single cropped maize and single cropped soybean as the control,the effects of different planting modes on the photosynthetic characteristic indexes of maize and soybean were studied.The results showed that intercropping could improve the light energy utilization rate of maize.The photosynthetic rate,chlorophyll content and leaf area index of intercropped maize increased by 22.4%-24.7%,9.2%-12.0% and 0.9%-3.5%,respectively than single cropped maize,and the photosynthetic rate and chlorophyll content differences were significant.Intercropping decreased the light energy utilization rate of soybean.The photosynthetic rate,chlorophyll content and leaf area index of intercropped soybean decreased by 3.5%-12.6%,1.6%-4.0% and 0.3%-0.5%,respectively than single cropped soybean,while the differences were all not significant.In maize and soybean intercropping system,with the increasing of large row spacing of maize,the chlorophyll content and leaf area index of maize increased,the photosynthetic rate of maize increased at first and decreased later,it was the highest in the intercropping system of 2∶ 3,and the photosynthetic rate,chlorophyll content and leaf area index of soybean increased,while the differences in the photosynthetic characteristics indexes among three intercropping modes were all not significant.The light energy utilization rate of maize and soybean intercropping system of 2∶ 3 was the highest.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 15
Claim · model-written summary
Intercropping improved light energy utilization in maize.
Zea maysNot reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“intercropping could improve the light energy utilization rate of maize”
Claim · model-written summary
Intercropped maize had increased photosynthetic rate by 22.4%-24.7%.
- Treatment
- intercropped maizee0
- Outcome
- photosynthetic ratee0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 22.4%-24.7%e0
- Comparator
- single cropped maizee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The photosynthetic rate,chlorophyll content and leaf area index of intercropped maize increased by 22.4%-24.7%,9.2%-12.0% and 0.9%-3.5%,respectively than single cropped maize,and the photosynthetic rate and chlorophyll content differences were significant.”
Claim · model-written summary
Intercropped maize had increased chlorophyll content by 9.2%-12.0%.
- Treatment
- intercropped maizee0
- Outcome
- chlorophyll contente0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 9.2%-12.0%e0
- Comparator
- single cropped maizee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The photosynthetic rate,chlorophyll content and leaf area index of intercropped maize increased by 22.4%-24.7%,9.2%-12.0% and 0.9%-3.5%,respectively than single cropped maize,and the photosynthetic rate and chlorophyll content differences were significant.”
Claim · model-written summary
Intercropped maize had increased leaf area index by 0.9%-3.5%.
- Treatment
- intercropped maizee0
- Outcome
- leaf area indexe0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 0.9%-3.5%e0
- Comparator
- single cropped maizee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The photosynthetic rate,chlorophyll content and leaf area index of intercropped maize increased by 22.4%-24.7%,9.2%-12.0% and 0.9%-3.5%,respectively than single cropped maize,and the photosynthetic rate and chlorophyll content differences were significant.”
Claim · model-written summary
Intercropping decreased soybean light energy utilization.
- Taxon
- soybean
Glycine maxe0 - Treatment
- Intercroppinge0
- Outcome
- light energy utilization ratee0
- Direction
- decreasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Intercropping decreased the light energy utilization rate of soybean”
Claim · model-written summary
Intercropped soybean had decreased photosynthetic rate by 3.5%-12.6%, without a significant difference.
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxe0
- Treatment
- intercropped soybeane0
- Outcome
- photosynthetic ratee0
- Direction
- decreasede0
- Value
- 3.5%-12.6%e0
- Comparator
- single cropped soybeane0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The photosynthetic rate,chlorophyll content and leaf area index of intercropped soybean decreased by 3.5%-12.6%,1.6%-4.0% and 0.3%-0.5%,respectively than single cropped soybean,while the differences were all not significant.”
Claim · model-written summary
Intercropped soybean had decreased chlorophyll content by 1.6%-4.0%, without a significant difference.
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxe0
- Treatment
- intercropped soybeane0
- Outcome
- chlorophyll contente0
- Direction
- decreasede0
- Value
- 1.6%-4.0%e0
- Comparator
- single cropped soybeane0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The photosynthetic rate,chlorophyll content and leaf area index of intercropped soybean decreased by 3.5%-12.6%,1.6%-4.0% and 0.3%-0.5%,respectively than single cropped soybean,while the differences were all not significant.”
Claim · model-written summary
Intercropped soybean had decreased leaf area index by 0.3%-0.5%, without a significant difference.
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxe0
- Treatment
- intercropped soybeane0
- Outcome
- leaf area indexe0
- Direction
- decreasede0
- Value
- 0.3%-0.5%e0
- Comparator
- single cropped soybeane0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The photosynthetic rate,chlorophyll content and leaf area index of intercropped soybean decreased by 3.5%-12.6%,1.6%-4.0% and 0.3%-0.5%,respectively than single cropped soybean,while the differences were all not significant.”
Claim · model-written summary
Increasing maize large row spacing increased maize chlorophyll content.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“with the increasing of large row spacing of maize,the chlorophyll content and leaf area index of maize increased,the photosynthetic rate of maize increased at first and decreased later,it was the highest in the intercropping system of 2∶ 3,and the photosynthetic rate,chlorophyll content and leaf area index of soybean increased,while the differences in the photosynthetic characteristics indexes among three intercropping modes were all not significant.”
Claim · model-written summary
Increasing maize large row spacing increased maize leaf area index.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“with the increasing of large row spacing of maize,the chlorophyll content and leaf area index of maize increased,the photosynthetic rate of maize increased at first and decreased later,it was the highest in the intercropping system of 2∶ 3,and the photosynthetic rate,chlorophyll content and leaf area index of soybean increased,while the differences in the photosynthetic characteristics indexes among three intercropping modes were all not significant.”
Claim · model-written summary
Maize photosynthetic rate first rose then fell as large row spacing increased, peaking at 2∶ 3.
- Treatment
- increasing of large row spacing of maizee0
- Outcome
- photosynthetic ratee0
- Direction
- increased at first and decreased latere0
- Value
- 2∶ 3e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“with the increasing of large row spacing of maize,the chlorophyll content and leaf area index of maize increased,the photosynthetic rate of maize increased at first and decreased later,it was the highest in the intercropping system of 2∶ 3,and the photosynthetic rate,chlorophyll content and leaf area index of soybean increased,while the differences in the photosynthetic characteristics indexes among three intercropping modes were all not significant.”
Claim · model-written summary
Soybean photosynthetic rate increased with wider maize rows, without a significant difference among modes.
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxe0
- Treatment
- increasing of large row spacing of maizee0
- Outcome
- photosynthetic ratee0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“with the increasing of large row spacing of maize,the chlorophyll content and leaf area index of maize increased,the photosynthetic rate of maize increased at first and decreased later,it was the highest in the intercropping system of 2∶ 3,and the photosynthetic rate,chlorophyll content and leaf area index of soybean increased,while the differences in the photosynthetic characteristics indexes among three intercropping modes were all not significant.”
Claim · model-written summary
Soybean chlorophyll content increased with wider maize rows, without a significant difference among modes.
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxe0
- Treatment
- increasing of large row spacing of maizee0
- Outcome
- chlorophyll contente0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“with the increasing of large row spacing of maize,the chlorophyll content and leaf area index of maize increased,the photosynthetic rate of maize increased at first and decreased later,it was the highest in the intercropping system of 2∶ 3,and the photosynthetic rate,chlorophyll content and leaf area index of soybean increased,while the differences in the photosynthetic characteristics indexes among three intercropping modes were all not significant.”
Claim · model-written summary
Soybean leaf area index increased with wider maize rows, without a significant difference among modes.
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxe0
- Treatment
- increasing of large row spacing of maizee0
- Outcome
- leaf area indexe0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“with the increasing of large row spacing of maize,the chlorophyll content and leaf area index of maize increased,the photosynthetic rate of maize increased at first and decreased later,it was the highest in the intercropping system of 2∶ 3,and the photosynthetic rate,chlorophyll content and leaf area index of soybean increased,while the differences in the photosynthetic characteristics indexes among three intercropping modes were all not significant.”
Claim · model-written summary
The 2∶ 3 intercropping system had the highest light energy utilization rate.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The light energy utilization rate of maize and soybean intercropping system of 2∶ 3 was the highest.”
The same questions in other papers
Zea mays · physiology: photosynthesis · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →Zea mays · growth · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results
15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- no effect
15 papers more in this group
See all 19 papers →intercropping · physiology: pigments · Glycine max (soybean)Results differ
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
6 papers more in this group
See all 10 papers →intercropping · physiology: pigments · Zea mays (maize)Results differ
16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
19 papers more in this group
See all 23 papers →intercropping · physiology: photosynthesis · Glycine max (soybean)Results differ
16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
21 papers more in this group
See all 25 papers →intercropping · growth · Glycine max (soybean)Results differ
27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 38 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
62 papers more in this group
See all 66 papers →intercropping · growth · Zea mays (maize)Results differ
137 papers in the same direction as this paper · 40 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
180 papers more in this group
See all 184 papers →density · physiology: pigments · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
8 of 14 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.