Paper · 2014 · Anhui nongye kexue

Study on Regulation and Control Technology of Tobacco Brown Spot Disease

Fan Jing-xi

9
claims
23
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

[Objective]The aim was to study regulation and control technology of tobacco brown spot disease.[Method]Resistance and the prevention and cure effect of different varieties,different fertilizer rate and transplanting period,different reagents on red star disease were compared. [Result]Tobacco 103 had strongest resistance,tobacco 100 and K326 followed,cloud 87 had CF205 were worst. N,P,K proportion of 1. 0∶ 1. 2∶ 3. 0 or 1. 0∶ 1. 5∶ 3. 0 was good,and applied nitrogen of 67. 5- 90. 0 kg / hm2was appropriate. May 5- 20 was the most suitable cultivation period. Control effect of 40% net sclerotium wettable powder on tobacco brown spot disease was the best with control effect of 53. 44%. [Conclusion]The study provided a reference for prevention of tobacco brown spot disease.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tobacco 103 had the stated resistance ranking for brown spot disease.

Material
Tobacco 103e0
Outcome
tobacco brown spot diseasee1
Direction
strongeste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–53 · show in text ↑
e0

“Tobacco 103 had strongest resistance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 286–322 · show in text ↑
e1

“tobacco brown spot disease.[Method]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 69–104 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

tobacco 100 had the stated resistance ranking for brown spot disease.

Material
tobacco 100e0
Outcome
tobacco brown spot diseasee1
Direction
followede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–53 · show in text ↑
e0

“tobacco 100 and K326 followed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 323–352 · show in text ↑
e1

“tobacco brown spot disease.[Method]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 69–104 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

K326 had the stated resistance ranking for brown spot disease.

Material
K326e0
Outcome
tobacco brown spot diseasee1
Direction
followede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–53 · show in text ↑
e0

“tobacco 100 and K326 followed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 323–352 · show in text ↑
e1

“tobacco brown spot disease.[Method]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 69–104 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

cloud 87 had the stated resistance ranking for brown spot disease.

Material
cloud 87e0
Outcome
tobacco brown spot diseasee1
Direction
worste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–53 · show in text ↑
e0

“cloud 87 had CF205 were worst”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 353–382 · show in text ↑
e1

“tobacco brown spot disease.[Method]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 69–104 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CF205 had the stated resistance ranking for brown spot disease.

Material
CF205e0
Outcome
tobacco brown spot diseasee1
Direction
worste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–53 · show in text ↑
e0

“cloud 87 had CF205 were worst”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 353–382 · show in text ↑
e1

“tobacco brown spot disease.[Method]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 69–104 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors identified N,P,K proportion of 1. 0∶ 1. 2∶ 3. 0 or 1. 0∶ 1. 5∶ 3. 0 was good.

Outcome
N,P,K proportione0

Not reportedValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–53 · show in text ↑
e0

“N,P,K proportion of 1. 0∶ 1. 2∶ 3. 0 or 1. 0∶ 1. 5∶ 3. 0 was good”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 384–449 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors identified applied nitrogen of 67. 5- 90. 0 kg / hm2was appropriate.

Outcome
applied nitrogene0
Value
67. 5- 90. 0 kg / hm2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–53 · show in text ↑
e0

“applied nitrogen of 67. 5- 90. 0 kg / hm2was appropriate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 454–510 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors identified May 5- 20 was the most suitable cultivation period.

Outcome
cultivation periode0
Value
May 5- 20e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–53 · show in text ↑
e0

“May 5- 20 was the most suitable cultivation period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 512–562 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

40% net sclerotium wettable powder gave the best brown spot control effect of 53. 44%.

Treatment
40% net sclerotium wettable powdere0
Outcome
control effecte0
Direction
beste0
Value
53. 44%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–53 · show in text ↑
e0

“Control effect of 40% net sclerotium wettable powder on tobacco brown spot disease was the best with control effect of 53. 44%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 564–690 · show in text ↑

trap barrier · control · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

botanical · control · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.