Paper · 1970 · Journal of Economic Entomology

Effect of an Area Program Using Blacklight Traps to Control Populations of Tobacco Hornworms and Tomato Hornworms in Kentucky12

George A. Jones; Richard Thurston

7
claims
20
verbatim quotes
3
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

An area program using 3 black light traps per square mile over 113 square miles was established in 1964 and maintained through 1966 in Shelby County, Kentucky, to evaluate its effectiveness in reducing populations of the tobacco hornworm, Manduca sexta(Johannson), and the tomato hornworm, M. quinquemaculata (Haworth), attacking burley tobacco. Fewer hornworm moths were caught in evaluation traps inside than outside this area in 1965 and 1966, but the difference was not so great for the female as for the male moths. The number of moths caught per evaluation trap was substantially greater in 1966 than in 1965, and there was no relative reduction of moths caught inside compared with those caught outside the area from 1965 to 1966. In 1965 and 1966 more eggs and larvae were found per plant outside than inside the 113-square-mile area. The number of eggs and larvae per plant did not increase with distance from the center of the area in 1965 but did in 1966. Economic control of tobacco and tomato hornworms was not achieved by the use of black light traps in this test in Kentucky.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fewer hornworm moths were caught in evaluation traps inside the black light trap area than outside it in 1965 and 1966.

Taxon
burley tobaccoe0
Treatment
black light trapse3
Interactor
hornworme1pest
Outcome
hornworm mothse1
Direction
Fewere1
Qualifier
the difference was not so great for the female as for the male mothse2
Comparator
outside this areae1
Setting
Shelby County, Kentuckye4

Verbatim

e0

“attacking burley tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 320–344 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fewer hornworm moths were caught in evaluation traps inside than outside this area in 1965 and 1966”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 346–445 · show in text ↑
e2

“but the difference was not so great for the female as for the male moths”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 447–519 · show in text ↑
e3

“An area program using 3 black light traps per square mile”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–57 · show in text ↑
e4

“in Shelby County, Kentucky”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 132–158 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The number of moths caught per evaluation trap was substantially greater in 1966 than in 1965.

Taxon
burley tobaccoe0
Outcome
moths caught per evaluation trape5
Direction
substantially greatere5
Comparator
in 1965e5

Verbatim

e0

“attacking burley tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 320–344 · show in text ↑
e5

“The number of moths caught per evaluation trap was substantially greater in 1966 than in 1965”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 521–614 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

There was no relative reduction of moths caught inside the black light trap area compared with outside it from 1965 to 1966.

Taxon
burley tobaccoe0
Treatment
black light trapse3
Outcome
relative reduction of moths caught insidee6
Direction
no relative reductione6
Comparator
caught outside the areae6

Verbatim

e0

“attacking burley tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 320–344 · show in text ↑
e3

“An area program using 3 black light traps per square mile”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–57 · show in text ↑
e6

“there was no relative reduction of moths caught inside compared with those caught outside the area from 1965 to 1966”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 620–736 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

More tobacco hornworm eggs and larvae were found per plant outside the black light trap area than inside it in 1965 and 1966.

Taxon
burley tobaccoe0
Treatment
black light trapse3
Interactor
tobacco hornwormManduca sextae4pest
Outcome
eggs and larvae were found per plante7
Direction
moree7
Comparator
inside the 113-square-mile areae7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manduca sexta
Manduca sexta · InteractorDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“attacking burley tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 320–344 · show in text ↑
e3

“An area program using 3 black light traps per square mile”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–57 · show in text ↑
e7

“In 1965 and 1966 more eggs and larvae were found per plant outside than inside the 113-square-mile area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 738–841 · show in text ↑
e4

“reducing populations of the tobacco hornworm, Manduca sexta(Johannson)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 193–263 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The number of eggs and larvae per plant did not increase with distance from the center of the area in 1965.

Taxon
burley tobaccoe0
Treatment
distance from the center of the areae4
Outcome
eggs and larvae per plante4
Direction
did not increasee4

Verbatim

e0

“attacking burley tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 320–344 · show in text ↑
e4

“The number of eggs and larvae per plant did not increase with distance from the center of the area in 1965 but did in 1966”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 843–965 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The number of eggs and larvae per plant increased with distance from the center of the area in 1966.

Taxon
burley tobaccoe0
Treatment
distance from the center of the areae4
Outcome
eggs and larvae per plante4
Direction
increaseinferrede4
Qualifier
in 1966e4

Verbatim

e0

“attacking burley tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 320–344 · show in text ↑
e4

“The number of eggs and larvae per plant did not increase with distance from the center of the area in 1965 but did in 1966”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 843–965 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Economic control of tobacco and tomato hornworms was not achieved with black light traps.

Taxon
burley tobaccoe0
Treatment
black light trapse5
Interactor
tobacco and tomato hornwormse5pest
Outcome
Economic controle5
Direction
not achievede5

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“attacking burley tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 320–344 · show in text ↑
e5

“Economic control of tobacco and tomato hornworms was not achieved by the use of black light traps”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 967–1064 · show in text ↑

trap barrier · control · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.