Paper · 2014 · Xiandai shipin keji

Effect of Lysozyme Coatings on the Storage and Preservation of Fresh-cut “Hanfu” Apples

Feng Xu-qia

9
claims
21
verbatim quotes
3
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

To study the effect of lysozyme coatings on the quality of fresh-cut Hanfu apples, the fresh-cut apples were soaked in 0.01%, 0.05%, and 0.08% lysozyme solution for 2 min and drained. They were then packaged in a polyethylene(PE) film with a thickness of 0.11 mm and stored in a refrigerator at 4 ℃. Physiochemical indicators related to maturity and aging were measured every two days during the storage period. The results showed that in a comparison with control, the lysozyme coating treatment more effectively maintained the quality of fresh-cut apples, partially inhibited increases in relative conductivity, malondialdehyde(MDA) content, polyphenol oxidase(PPO) activity, and total bacterial count, and significantly maintained the peroxidase activity. After cold storage at 4 ℃ for 8 d, the quality of lysozyme-treated fresh-cut apples was effectively maintained in terms of sensory evaluation, hardness, color, soluble solids, and ascorbic acid content. Of the three concentrations of lysozyme coatings examined, the 0.08% lysozyme solution showed the best preservation, followed by the 0.05% lysozyme solution, and the 0.01% lysozyme solution did not show apparent effects on the preservation of freshness.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lysozyme coating maintained fresh-cut apple quality better than control.

Material
Hanfut0
Treatment
lysozyme coating treatmente0
Outcome
quality of fresh-cut applese0
Direction
more effectively maintainede0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in a comparison with control, the lysozyme coating treatment more effectively maintained the quality of fresh-cut apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 436–556 · show in text ↑
t0

“Hanfu”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lysozyme coating partially inhibited increases in relative conductivity, MDA content, and PPO activity.

Material
Hanfut0
Treatment
lysozyme coating treatmente1
Outcome
relative conductivity, malondialdehyde(MDA) content, polyphenol oxidase(PPO) activitye0
Direction
inhibitede0
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“partially inhibited increases in relative conductivity, malondialdehyde(MDA) content, polyphenol oxidase(PPO) activity, and total bacterial count”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 558–703 · show in text ↑
t0

“Hanfu” Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–87 · show in text ↑
e1

“in a comparison with control, the lysozyme coating treatment more effectively maintained the quality of fresh-cut apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 436–556 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lysozyme coating partially inhibited increases in total bacterial count.

Material
Hanfut0
Treatment
lysozyme coating treatmente1
Outcome
total bacterial counte0
Direction
inhibitede0
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“partially inhibited increases in relative conductivity, malondialdehyde(MDA) content, polyphenol oxidase(PPO) activity, and total bacterial count”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 558–703 · show in text ↑
t0

“Hanfu” Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–87 · show in text ↑
e1

“in a comparison with control, the lysozyme coating treatment more effectively maintained the quality of fresh-cut apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 436–556 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Lysozyme coating significantly maintained peroxidase activity.

Material
Hanfut0
Treatment
lysozyme coating treatmente1
Outcome
peroxidase activitye0
Direction
maintainede0
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significantly maintained the peroxidase activity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 709–758 · show in text ↑
t0

“Hanfu” Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–87 · show in text ↑
e1

“in a comparison with control, the lysozyme coating treatment more effectively maintained the quality of fresh-cut apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 436–556 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After eight days at 4 ℃, lysozyme treated fruit maintained sensory quality, hardness, and color.

Material
Hanfut0
Treatment
lysozyme-treatede0
Outcome
sensory evaluation, hardness, colore0
Direction
maintainede0
Qualifier
4 ℃ for 8 de0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“After cold storage at 4 ℃ for 8 d, the quality of lysozyme-treated fresh-cut apples was effectively maintained in terms of sensory evaluation, hardness, color, soluble solids, and ascorbic acid content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 759–961 · show in text ↑
t0

“Hanfu”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After eight days at 4 ℃, lysozyme treated fruit maintained soluble solids and ascorbic acid content.

Material
Hanfut0
Treatment
lysozyme-treatede0
Outcome
soluble solids, and ascorbic acid contente0
Direction
maintainede0
Qualifier
4 ℃ for 8 de0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“After cold storage at 4 ℃ for 8 d, the quality of lysozyme-treated fresh-cut apples was effectively maintained in terms of sensory evaluation, hardness, color, soluble solids, and ascorbic acid content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 759–961 · show in text ↑
t0

“Hanfu”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 0.08% lysozyme coating showed the best preservation.

Material
Hanfut0
Treatment
0.08% lysozyme solutione0
Outcome
preservatione0
Direction
beste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the 0.08% lysozyme solution showed the best preservation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1021–1077 · show in text ↑
t0

“Hanfu” Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 0.05% lysozyme coating ranked second for preservation.

Material
Hanfut0
Treatment
0.05% lysozyme solutione0
Outcome
followed bye0
Direction
followed bye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“followed by the 0.05% lysozyme solution”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1079–1118 · show in text ↑
t0

“Hanfu” Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 0.01% lysozyme coating had no apparent freshness preservation effect.

Material
Hanfut0
Treatment
0.01% lysozyme solutione0
Outcome
preservation of freshnesse0
Direction
did not show apparent effectse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the 0.01% lysozyme solution did not show apparent effects on the preservation of freshness.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1124–1215 · show in text ↑
t0

“Hanfu” Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–87 · show in text ↑

storage · physiology: oxidative · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 8 positive, 2 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

storage · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 10 positive, 5 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

storage · quality: general · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

46 papers: 36 positive, 10 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

42 papers more in this group

See all 46 papers →

storage · soil: biology · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.