Abstract
In this paper, the effects of lime and silicon fertilizer application on soil available cadmium(Cd)content and Cd accumulation in peanut kernel were studied by pot culture experiment with conventional fertilization. The results showed that:(1)The soil pH were signifi- cantly increased in lime and lime-silicon fertilizer combining applicable treatment,and the cell membrane permeability of peanut leaves tend to lower meanwhile. In treatment of lime application with 0.67 g·kg-1 soil, the soil available Cd content was significantly decrease by 12.6%. And the decrease of soil available Cd content was not increased with the lime application increased. But there was no significant decrease in the treatment of lime-silicon fertilizer combining applicable treatment, which maybe due to the high Cd content in silicon fertilizer(.2)The Cd content of peanut kernel in all lime applicable treatments showed a tendency to decrease. In the treatment of lime applicable treatment with 0.67 g·kg-1 , the Cd content of peanut kernel was decrease by 26.1%, but this state in treatments of lime-silicon fertilizer combining applica- ble treatments was not significant. The highest stage of decrease of kernel Cd was 39.7% in the treatment of 0.67 g·kg-1 lime and 0.33 g·kg-1 silicon fertilizer. While the kernel Cd increased with silicon fertilizer application increased(.3)The Cd content in peanut kernel had a signifi- cant correlation with the available Cd content of soil, which indicate the availability of soil Cd could affect the Cd content of peanut kernel di- rectly.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 11
Claim · model-written summary
Lime and combined lime silicon treatments significantly increased soil pH.
- Taxon
- peanut
Arachis hypogaeat0 - Treatment
- lime and lime-silicon fertilizer combining applicable treatmente0
- Outcome
- soil pHe0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The soil pH were signifi- cantly increased in lime and lime-silicon fertilizer combining applicable treatment”
t0“Peanut”
Claim · model-written summary
Peanut leaf membrane permeability tended to decline with these treatments.
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeae0
- Treatment
- lime and lime-silicon fertilizer combining applicable treatmente1
- Outcome
- cell membrane permeabilitye0
- Direction
- lowere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the cell membrane permeability of peanut leaves tend to lower meanwhile.”
e1“The soil pH were signifi- cantly increased in lime and lime-silicon fertilizer combining applicable treatment”
Claim · model-written summary
Lime at 0.67 g·kg-1 soil significantly lowered available soil Cd by 12.6%.
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- lime application with 0.67 g·kg-1 soile0
- Outcome
- soil available Cd contente0
- Direction
- decreasee0
- Value
- 12.6%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In treatment of lime application with 0.67 g·kg-1 soil, the soil available Cd content was significantly decrease by 12.6%.”
t0“Peanut”
Claim · model-written summary
More lime did not further increase the decline in available soil Cd.
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- lime application increasede0
- Outcome
- decrease of soil available Cd contente0
- Direction
- not increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the decrease of soil available Cd content was not increased with the lime application increased.”
t0“Peanut”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined lime silicon fertilizer did not significantly lower available soil Cd.
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- lime-silicon fertilizer combining applicable treatmente0
- Outcome
- soil available Cd contente1
- Direction
- no significant decreasee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“there was no significant decrease in the treatment of lime-silicon fertilizer combining applicable treatment”
t0“Peanut”
e1“In treatment of lime application with 0.67 g·kg-1 soil, the soil available Cd content was significantly decrease by 12.6%.”
Claim · model-written summary
All lime treatments tended to decrease peanut kernel Cd.
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeae0
- Treatment
- lime applicable treatmentse0
- Outcome
- Cd content of peanut kernele0
- Direction
- decreasee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The Cd content of peanut kernel in all lime applicable treatments showed a tendency to decrease.”
Claim · model-written summary
Lime at 0.67 g·kg-1 lowered kernel Cd by 26.1%.
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeae0
- Treatment
- lime applicable treatment with 0.67 g·kg-1e0
- Outcome
- Cd content of peanut kernele0
- Direction
- decreasee0
- Value
- 26.1%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In the treatment of lime applicable treatment with 0.67 g·kg-1 , the Cd content of peanut kernel was decrease by 26.1%”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined lime silicon treatments did not significantly decrease kernel Cd overall.
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- lime-silicon fertilizer combining applica- ble treatmentse0
- Outcome
- Cd content of peanut kernele1
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“this state in treatments of lime-silicon fertilizer combining applica- ble treatments was not significant.”
t0“Peanut”
e1“The Cd content of peanut kernel in all lime applicable treatments showed a tendency to decrease.”
Claim · model-written summary
The largest kernel Cd reduction was 39.7% at 0.67 g·kg-1 lime and 0.33 g·kg-1 silicon fertilizer.
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- 0.67 g·kg-1 lime and 0.33 g·kg-1 silicon fertilizere0
- Outcome
- kernel Cde0
- Direction
- decreasee0
- Value
- 39.7%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The highest stage of decrease of kernel Cd was 39.7% in the treatment of 0.67 g·kg-1 lime and 0.33 g·kg-1 silicon fertilizer.”
t0“Peanut”
Claim · model-written summary
Kernel Cd rose as silicon fertilizer application increased.
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- silicon fertilizer applicatione0
- Outcome
- kernel Cde0
- Direction
- increasede0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the kernel Cd increased with silicon fertilizer application increased”
t0“Peanut”
Claim · model-written summary
Peanut kernel Cd was significantly correlated with available soil Cd.
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeae0
- Compound
- available Cd content of soile0
- Outcome
- Cd content in peanut kernele0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The Cd content in peanut kernel had a signifi- cant correlation with the available Cd content of soil”
The same questions in other papers
silicon atom · nutrient: content · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
lime · nutrient: content · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results differ
38 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
42 papers more in this group
See all 46 papers →fertilization · nutrient: content · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
146 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
149 papers more in this group
See all 153 papers →fertilization · physiology: oxidative · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree
4 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.