Abstract
Abstract Most peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) fields of the Southern Coastal Plain are treated with either vernolate (S-propyl dipropylthiocarbamate) or benefin (N-butyl-N-ethyl-a,a,a-trifluoro-2, 6-dinitro-p-toluidine) or a combination of these two herbicides to control certain weeds. The nematicide DBCP (1,2-dibromo-3-chloropropane) is also used in some fields. Field and greenhouse experiments were conducted to determine the effect of vernolate, benefin, DBCP, and Rhizobium sp. on nodulation, yield, quality, and chemical composition of ‘Starr’ peanuts. The application of herbicides, nematicide, and inoculant had no significant effect on yield, sound mature kernels, or ether extract of ‘Starr’ peanuts. The N content of the leaf and seed and the number of nodules were not affected by the treatments. Nematode infestation was low and did not affect yield. In the greenhouse studies, the application of lime, herbicides, or fertilizer did not affect certain morphological characteristics of the plant or N content of the peanut leaves. Nitrogen fertilization increased the weight of the peanut foliage.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Herbicides, nematicide, and inoculant had no significant effect on peanut yield, sound mature kernels, or ether extract.
- Taxon
- peanut
Arachis hypogaeae1 - Material
- ‘Starr’e0
- Treatment
- herbicides, nematicide, and inoculante0
- Outcome
- yield, sound mature kernels, or ether extracte0
- Direction
- no significant effecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The application of herbicides, nematicide, and inoculant had no significant effect on yield, sound mature kernels, or ether extract of ‘Starr’ peanuts.”
e1“peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Treatments did not affect leaf or seed N content or nodule number.
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeae1
- Treatment
- treatmentse0
- Outcome
- N content of the leaf and seed and the number of nodulese0
- Direction
- not affectede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The N content of the leaf and seed and the number of nodules were not affected by the treatments.”
e1“peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Low nematode infestation did not affect peanut yield.
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeae1
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- did not affecte0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Nematode infestation was low and did not affect yield.”
e1“peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Greenhouse lime, herbicide, or fertilizer applications did not affect plant morphology or leaf N content.
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeae1
- Treatment
- lime, herbicides, or fertilizere0
- Outcome
- certain morphological characteristics of the plant or N content of the peanut leavese0
- Direction
- did not affecte0
- Setting
- greenhousee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In the greenhouse studies, the application of lime, herbicides, or fertilizer did not affect certain morphological characteristics of the plant or N content of the peanut leaves.”
e1“peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Nitrogen fertilization increased peanut foliage weight.
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeae0
- Treatment
- Nitrogen fertilizatione0
- Outcome
- weight of the peanut foliagee0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Nitrogen fertilization increased the weight of the peanut foliage.”
e1“peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.)”
The same questions in other papers
insecticide · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results differ
8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
27 papers more in this group
See all 31 papers →lime · nutrient: content · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results differ
6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 39 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
42 papers more in this group
See all 46 papers →herbicide · nutrient: content · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
11 papers more in this group
See all 15 papers →fertilization · organism · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
27 papers more in this group
See all 31 papers →fertilization · nutrient: content · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 147 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
149 papers more in this group
See all 153 papers →inoculation · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 198 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- no effect
217 papers more in this group
See all 221 papers →herbicide · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
57 papers in the same direction as this paper · 172 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
226 papers more in this group
See all 230 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.