Paper · 2008 · Guoshu xuebao

Study on the identification techniques for determining strawberry cultivar's resistance to anthracnose

Zhihong Zhang

8
claims
15
verbatim quotes
3
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Total of 6 strawberry cultivars were used as materials for studying the identification techniques for examining their resistance to anthracnose. The Colletotrichum gloeosporioides was isolated from the diseased strawberry plants. The result showed that all 3 methods of inoculating C. gloeosporioides, dropping spore suspension, clasping the mycelia plugs and spraying spore suspension on the leaves, induced strawberry plants to develop the anthracnose symptoms. Among them, the spray inoculation method resulted in the highest diseased rate and diseased index. The evaluation system for determining strawberry plant’s resistantance to anthracnose was established, i.e., C. gloeosporioides inoculated on plants at 6 leaves stage with spraying the suspension at the concentration of 1.0×105 conidia/mL, keeping moisture for 48 h post inoculation, and the diseased rate and diseased index on leaves investigated 5 d after inoculation, and on stolons and petioles investigated 7 d after inoculation. The result of identification showed that Benihoppe was a susceptible cultivar, Toyonoka showed moderately susceptible, Honeoye and Xinmingxing showed moderately resistant,Maliya and Tudla showed more resistant. Such results are accorded with the exhibitions of their resistances in field.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three inoculation methods induced anthracnose symptoms in strawberry.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae0
Treatment
inoculating C. gloeosporioidese0
Interactor
C. gloeosporioidesColletotrichum gloeosporioidese0pathogen
Outcome
anthracnose symptomse0
Direction
inducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Colletotrichum gloeosporioides
Colletotrichum gloeosporioides · InteractorRGimilio · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“all 3 methods of inoculating C. gloeosporioides, dropping spore suspension, clasping the mycelia plugs and spraying spore suspension on the leaves, induced strawberry plants to develop the anthracnose symptoms”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 253–462 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spray inoculation produced the highest diseased rate and index.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae1
Treatment
spray inoculation methode0
Interactor
C. gloeosporioidesColletotrichum gloeosporioidese2pathogen
Outcome
diseased rate and diseased indexe0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Colletotrichum gloeosporioides
Colletotrichum gloeosporioides · InteractorRGimilio · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the spray inoculation method resulted in the highest diseased rate and diseased index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 476–561 · show in text ↑
e1

“induced strawberry plants to develop the anthracnose symptoms”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 401–462 · show in text ↑
e2

“methods of inoculating C. gloeosporioides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 259–300 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

An anthracnose resistance evaluation system was established using spray inoculation at six leaves and timed scoring.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae0
Organ / stage
6 leaves stagee0
Interactor
C. gloeosporioidesColletotrichum gloeosporioidese0pathogen
Outcome
evaluation system for determining strawberry plant’s resistantance to anthracnosee0
Value
1.0×105 conidia/mLe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Colletotrichum gloeosporioides
Colletotrichum gloeosporioides · InteractorRGimilio · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The evaluation system for determining strawberry plant’s resistantance to anthracnose was established, i.e., C. gloeosporioides inoculated on plants at 6 leaves stage with spraying the suspension at the concentration of 1.0×105 conidia/mL, keeping moisture for 48 h post inoculation, and the diseased rate and diseased index on leaves investigated 5 d after inoculation, and on stolons and petioles investigated 7 d after inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 563–996 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Benihoppe was susceptible to anthracnose.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Material
Benihoppee0
Outcome
susceptible cultivare0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Benihoppe was a susceptible cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1039–1075 · show in text ↑
t0

“strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–65 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Toyonoka was moderately susceptible to anthracnose.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Material
Toyonokae0
Outcome
moderately susceptiblee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Toyonoka showed moderately susceptible”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1077–1115 · show in text ↑
t0

“strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–65 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Honeoye and Xinmingxing were moderately resistant.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Material
Honeoye and Xinmingxinge0
Outcome
moderately resistante0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Honeoye and Xinmingxing showed moderately resistant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1117–1168 · show in text ↑
t0

“strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–65 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maliya and Tudla were more resistant.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Material
Maliya and Tudlae0
Outcome
more resistante0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maliya and Tudla showed more resistant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1169–1207 · show in text ↑
t0

“strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–65 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivar resistance results agreed with field performance.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Outcome
resistances in fielde0
Setting
fielde0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Such results are accorded with the exhibitions of their resistances in field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1209–1285 · show in text ↑
t0

“strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–65 · show in text ↑

application · Colletotrichum gloeosporioides · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

inoculation · Colletotrichum gloeosporioides · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

inoculation · disease · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

72 papers: 33 positive, 39 negative or no effect

38 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

68 papers more in this group

See all 72 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.