Paper · 2007 · Food Science

Comparison Study on Effects of Panol and Sodium Paeonol Sulfonate (SPS) on Cherry Fruits Preservation

WU Guo-rong

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The preservation effects of highly purified panol and SPS on cherry tomatoes and their mechanism were investigated in this paper. Results showed that: during the storage period, both panol and SPS could effectively reduce weight-loss and mildewing rate, delay increase of the membrane permeability of fruits, inhibit decease of contents of the vitamin C and soluble protein, and maintain the SOD activities and effectively restrain the growth of the fruit exterior microbes. Results also showed that a close positive correlationship exists between the preservation effects of panol and SPS and their concentrations in the treatment. Preservation effects of SPS are better than those of panol on weight-loss and mildewing rate, membrane permeability, microbial growth inhibition and other targets of the storage fruits. The preservation of the polyphenols of tea in electropositive contrast is of little difference from that of panol in corresponding concentration. The reason may be that: after the addition of the sulfonate at the 5C of panol, both the stability to O2 and light and the permeability to storage fruits increase highly.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Panol reduced fruit weight loss and mildewing during storage.

Treatment
panole0
Outcome
weight-loss and mildewing ratee0
Direction
reducee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme
Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme · TaxonJS · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“both panol and SPS could effectively reduce weight-loss and mildewing rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 178–252 · show in text ↑
e1

“preservation effects of highly purified panol and SPS on cherry tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SPS reduced fruit weight loss and mildewing during storage.

Treatment
SPSe0
Outcome
weight-loss and mildewing ratee0
Direction
reducee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme
Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme · TaxonJS · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“both panol and SPS could effectively reduce weight-loss and mildewing rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 178–252 · show in text ↑
e1

“preservation effects of highly purified panol and SPS on cherry tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4–76 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Panol and SPS delayed increased fruit membrane permeability.

Outcome
membrane permeability of fruitse0
Direction
delay increasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme
Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme · TaxonJS · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“delay increase of the membrane permeability of fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 254–307 · show in text ↑
e1

“preservation effects of highly purified panol and SPS on cherry tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4–76 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Panol and SPS inhibited loss of vitamin C and soluble protein.

Outcome
contents of the vitamin C and soluble proteine0
Direction
inhibit deceasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme
Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme · TaxonJS · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“inhibit decease of contents of the vitamin C and soluble protein”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 309–373 · show in text ↑
e1

“preservation effects of highly purified panol and SPS on cherry tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4–76 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Panol and SPS maintained fruit SOD activity.

Outcome
SOD activitiese0
Direction
maintaine0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme
Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme · TaxonJS · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maintain the SOD activities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 379–406 · show in text ↑
e1

“preservation effects of highly purified panol and SPS on cherry tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4–76 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Panol and SPS restrained growth of microbes on the fruit exterior.

Outcome
growth of the fruit exterior microbese0
Direction
restraine0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme
Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme · TaxonJS · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“effectively restrain the growth of the fruit exterior microbes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 411–473 · show in text ↑
e1

“preservation effects of highly purified panol and SPS on cherry tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4–76 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Preservation effects increased with panol and SPS concentration.

Treatment
panol and SPSe0
Outcome
preservation effectse0
Direction
positivee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme
Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme · TaxonJS · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a close positive correlationship exists between the preservation effects of panol and SPS and their concentrations in the treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 500–631 · show in text ↑
e1

“preservation effects of highly purified panol and SPS on cherry tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4–76 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SPS preserved fruit weight, mildewing rate, membrane permeability and microbial growth better than panol.

Outcome
weight-loss and mildewing rate, membrane permeability, microbial growth inhibitione0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
panole0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme
Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme · TaxonJS · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Preservation effects of SPS are better than those of panol on weight-loss and mildewing rate, membrane permeability, microbial growth inhibition and other targets of the storage fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 633–817 · show in text ↑
e1

“preservation effects of highly purified panol and SPS on cherry tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4–76 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tea polyphenols and panol showed little difference in preservation at corresponding concentration.

Outcome
preservatione0
Direction
little differencee0
Qualifier
corresponding concentratione0
Comparator
panole0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme
Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme · TaxonJS · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The preservation of the polyphenols of tea in electropositive contrast is of little difference from that of panol in corresponding concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 819–963 · show in text ↑
e1

“preservation effects of highly purified panol and SPS on cherry tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4–76 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors proposed that sulfonation at panol 5C increased stability to oxygen and light and permeability into stored fruit.

Outcome
stability to O2 and light and the permeability to storage fruitse0
Direction
increase highlye0
Qualifier
addition of the sulfonate at the 5C of panole0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme
Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme · TaxonJS · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“after the addition of the sulfonate at the 5C of panol, both the stability to O2 and light and the permeability to storage fruits increase highly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 989–1134 · show in text ↑
e1

“preservation effects of highly purified panol and SPS on cherry tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4–76 · show in text ↑

sodium atom · quality: postharvest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.