Paper · 2013 · Mailei zuowu xuebao

Research on the Different UV-B Resistance of Two Winter Wheat

Siliang Zhang

10
claims
16
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In this study,the winter wheat Nongda 6081 whose growth was promoted by a certain intensity of UV-B in seedling stage and the winter wheat 9305031-2 whose growth was inhibited were used as materials.These two cultivars were irradiated by UV-B(15 μW·cm-2,6 h per day) after the emergence in the phytotron and then related indexes of growth,photosynthesis,UV-absorbing materials,membrane permeability,H2O2 accumulation and removal ability were all compared and analyzed.The results showed that,UV-B treatment promoted the plant height,dry weight,PSII function,SOD activity,CAT activity,content of soluble protein,and content of UV-absorbing materials such as carotenoids and flavonoids of resistant winter wheat Nongda 6081,but decreased the content of H2O2 and the electrolyte leakage of membrane systems,suggesting that the producing or removal of ROS and H2O2 was effectively controlled.But,the activities of SOD and CAT of sensitive winter wheat 9305031-2 were not improved and the content of carotenoids was inhibited,resulting that a great quantity of H2O2 was accumulated and content of chlorophyll,plant height,leaf area,dry weight,PSII function and membrane system were inhibited.It was concluded that,the resistance difference between Nongda 6081 and 9305031-2 was mainly caused by the difference in the metabolism of ROS.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UV-B promoted height and dry weight of resistant Nongda 6081.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Material
Nongda 6081e0
Treatment
UV-B treatmente0
Outcome
plant height,dry weighte0
Direction
promotede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“UV-B treatment promoted the plant height,dry weight,PSII function,SOD activity,CAT activity,content of soluble protein,and content of UV-absorbing materials such as carotenoids and flavonoids of resistant winter wheat Nongda 6081”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 492–721 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UV-B promoted PSII function in Nongda 6081.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Material
Nongda 6081e0
Treatment
UV-B treatmente0
Outcome
PSII functione0
Direction
promotede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“UV-B treatment promoted the plant height,dry weight,PSII function,SOD activity,CAT activity,content of soluble protein,and content of UV-absorbing materials such as carotenoids and flavonoids of resistant winter wheat Nongda 6081”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 492–721 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UV-B promoted SOD and CAT activity in Nongda 6081.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Material
Nongda 6081e0
Treatment
UV-B treatmente0
Outcome
SOD activity,CAT activitye0
Direction
promotede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“UV-B treatment promoted the plant height,dry weight,PSII function,SOD activity,CAT activity,content of soluble protein,and content of UV-absorbing materials such as carotenoids and flavonoids of resistant winter wheat Nongda 6081”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 492–721 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UV-B promoted soluble protein and UV-absorbing carotenoids and flavonoids in Nongda 6081.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Material
Nongda 6081e0
Treatment
UV-B treatmente0
Outcome
content of soluble protein,and content of UV-absorbing materials such as carotenoids and flavonoidse0
Direction
promotede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“UV-B treatment promoted the plant height,dry weight,PSII function,SOD activity,CAT activity,content of soluble protein,and content of UV-absorbing materials such as carotenoids and flavonoids of resistant winter wheat Nongda 6081”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 492–721 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UV-B reduced H2O2 content and electrolyte leakage in Nongda 6081.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
Nongda 6081e0
Treatment
UV-Be0
Outcome
content of H2O2 and the electrolyte leakage of membrane systemse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“UV-B treatment promoted the plant height,dry weight,PSII function,SOD activity,CAT activity,content of soluble protein,and content of UV-absorbing materials such as carotenoids and flavonoids of resistant winter wheat Nongda 6081,but decreased the content of H2O2 and the electrolyte leakage of membrane systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 492–803 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 49–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UV-B did not improve SOD and CAT activity in sensitive 9305031-2.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Material
9305031-2e0
Treatment
UV-Bt0
Outcome
activities of SOD and CATe0
Direction
not improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the activities of SOD and CAT of sensitive winter wheat 9305031-2 were not improved”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 892–975 · show in text ↑
t0

“Research on the Different UV-B Resistance of Two Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UV-B inhibited carotenoid content in 9305031-2.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
9305031-2e0
Treatment
UV-Bt0
Outcome
content of carotenoidse0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the activities of SOD and CAT of sensitive winter wheat 9305031-2 were not improved and the content of carotenoids was inhibited,resulting that a great quantity of H2O2 was accumulated and content of chlorophyll,plant height,leaf area,dry weight,PSII function and membrane system were inhibited.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 892–1187 · show in text ↑
t0

“Research on the Different UV-B Resistance of Two Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

H2O2 accumulated in sensitive 9305031-2 under UV-B.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
9305031-2e0
Treatment
UV-Bt0
Outcome
H2O2e0
Direction
accumulatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the activities of SOD and CAT of sensitive winter wheat 9305031-2 were not improved and the content of carotenoids was inhibited,resulting that a great quantity of H2O2 was accumulated and content of chlorophyll,plant height,leaf area,dry weight,PSII function and membrane system were inhibited.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 892–1187 · show in text ↑
t0

“Research on the Different UV-B Resistance of Two Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorophyll content, height, leaf area, dry weight, PSII function and membrane system were inhibited in sensitive wheat.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
9305031-2e0
Treatment
UV-Bt0
Outcome
content of chlorophyll,plant height,leaf area,dry weight,PSII function and membrane systeme0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the activities of SOD and CAT of sensitive winter wheat 9305031-2 were not improved and the content of carotenoids was inhibited,resulting that a great quantity of H2O2 was accumulated and content of chlorophyll,plant height,leaf area,dry weight,PSII function and membrane system were inhibited.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 892–1187 · show in text ↑
t0

“Research on the Different UV-B Resistance of Two Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–61 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Authors attributed cultivar resistance differences mainly to ROS metabolism.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
Nongda 6081 and 9305031-2e0
Outcome
resistance differencee0
Qualifier
difference in the metabolism of ROSe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the resistance difference between Nongda 6081 and 9305031-2 was mainly caused by the difference in the metabolism of ROS.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1209–1330 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 49–61 · show in text ↑

uv · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

13 papers: 8 positive, 5 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

uv · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

19 papers: 7 positive, 12 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

uv · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

23 papers: 3 positive, 20 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

uv · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

45 papers: 19 positive, 26 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 26 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

41 papers more in this group

See all 45 papers →

uv · physiology: oxidative · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 5 positive, 12 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.