Paper · 2007 · Journal of Beijing University of Agriculture

Effect of Light Intensity on Zaoyu Peach Flower Development

Jia Ke-gong

8
claims
15
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The effect of low light on peach flower development was observed three treatments were a layer of window screen,a layer of sunshading-net,a layer of window screen plus a layer of sunshading-net,combined with actual light intensity with potted zaoyu cultivar peach.The results showed:with the light intensity decreasing,each stage was affected in flower development period,and flowering stage was obviously shortened;petal color decreased with light intensity decreasing,light intensity did not affect flower diameter,the length of filament,pistil ovary,anther size,size and number of pollen grain;with the light intensity decreasing,pollen germination tended to rteduce,moreover,26.1 klx,14.5 klx of diurnal average light intensity had both significantly reduced pollen germination;light stress point lies in 14.5~26.1 klx in peach flower development period.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Decreasing light affected every stage and shortened flowering.

Treatment
light intensity decreasinge0
Outcome
flowering stagee0
Direction
shortenede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“with the light intensity decreasing,each stage was affected in flower development period,and flowering stage was obviously shortened”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 283–415 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 35–40 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Petal color decreased as light intensity fell.

Treatment
light intensity decreasinge0
Outcome
petal colore0
Direction
decreasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“petal color decreased with light intensity decreasing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 416–469 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 35–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Light intensity did not affect flower diameter, filament length, or pistil ovary.

Treatment
light intensitye0
Outcome
flower diameter,the length of filament,pistil ovarye0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“light intensity did not affect flower diameter,the length of filament,pistil ovary,anther size,size and number of pollen grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 470–596 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 35–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Light intensity did not affect anther size or pollen size and number.

Treatment
light intensitye0
Outcome
anther size,size and number of pollen graine0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“light intensity did not affect flower diameter,the length of filament,pistil ovary,anther size,size and number of pollen grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 470–596 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 35–40 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pollen germination tended to decrease as light intensity fell.

Treatment
light intensity decreasinge0
Outcome
pollen germinatione0
Direction
rteducee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“with the light intensity decreasing,pollen germination tended to rteduce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 597–669 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 35–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Diurnal light intensity of 26.1 klx significantly reduced pollen germination.

Treatment
26.1 klxe0
Outcome
pollen germinatione0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“26.1 klx,14.5 klx of diurnal average light intensity had both significantly reduced pollen germination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 679–781 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 35–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Diurnal light intensity of 14.5 klx significantly reduced pollen germination.

Treatment
14.5 klxe0
Outcome
pollen germinatione0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“26.1 klx,14.5 klx of diurnal average light intensity had both significantly reduced pollen germination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 679–781 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 35–40 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The flower-development light stress point was 14.5~26.1 klx.

Outcome
light stress pointe0
Value
14.5~26.1 klxe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“light stress point lies in 14.5~26.1 klx in peach flower development period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 782–857 · show in text ↑

light · phenology · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

light · growth · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 14 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.