Paper · 2011 · HortScience

Interactive Effects of Light and Chilling on Peach Flower and Leaf Budbreak

William R. Okie; Bryan Blackburn

6
claims
11
verbatim quotes
10
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Timing of budbreak in response to winter chilling is a critical factor in the suitability of peach [ Prunus persica (L.) Batsch] cultivars to moderate climates such as that in the southeastern United States. Much of the research on chilling and dormancy has used excised cuttings or potted trees exposed to various treatments and forced under controlled conditions. Light is not generally considered an important factor in such experiments, and the effect of light during forcing has been little studied. The objective of this research was to compare light versus dark conditions during forcing as well as the effects of different colors of light during forcing. Our results showed that after chilling had been minimally satisfied, peach floral and vegetative budbreak occurred faster when forced in the presence of light than when forced in darkness. Light increased budbreak rate as well as the total percentage of budbreak. Red, yellow, and fluorescent light were more promotive in increasing budbreak than blue, green, infrared, or incandescent light, suggesting a role for phytochrome. Promotive effects of light were less when buds had received enough natural chill and heat to break within a week of forcing at 18 °C. In conclusion, light during forcing can have a significant effect of budbreak and needs to be considered when doing research on chilling and dormancy.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After minimal chilling, light accelerated floral and vegetative budbreak versus darkness.

Treatment
presence of lighte0
Outcome
floral and vegetative budbreake0
Direction
fastere0
Comparator
darknesse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“after chilling had been minimally satisfied, peach floral and vegetative budbreak occurred faster when forced in the presence of light than when forced in darkness.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 687–851 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Light increased budbreak rate.

Treatment
Lighte0
Outcome
budbreak ratee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Light increased budbreak rate as well as the total percentage of budbreak.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 852–926 · show in text ↑
e1

“peach [ Prunus persica (L.) Batsch]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 93–128 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Light increased total budbreak percentage.

Treatment
Lighte0
Outcome
total percentage of budbreake0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Light increased budbreak rate as well as the total percentage of budbreak.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 852–926 · show in text ↑
e1

“peach [ Prunus persica (L.) Batsch]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 93–128 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Red, yellow and fluorescent light promoted budbreak more than blue, green, infrared or incandescent light.

Treatment
Red, yellow, and fluorescent lighte0
Outcome
budbreake0
Direction
more promotivee0
Comparator
blue, green, infrared, or incandescent lighte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Red, yellow, and fluorescent light were more promotive in increasing budbreak than blue, green, infrared, or incandescent light, suggesting a role for phytochrome.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 927–1090 · show in text ↑
e1

“peach [ Prunus persica (L.) Batsch]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 93–128 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggested phytochrome may mediate the light effect.

Gene
phytochromee0
Outcome
role for phytochromee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“suggesting a role for phytochrome”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1056–1089 · show in text ↑
e1

“peach [ Prunus persica (L.) Batsch]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 93–128 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Light promotion weakened after enough natural chill and heat for budbreak within a week at 18 °C.

Treatment
lighte0
Outcome
Promotive effects of lighte0
Direction
lesse0
Qualifier
enough natural chill and heat to break within a week of forcing at 18 °Ce0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Promotive effects of light were less when buds had received enough natural chill and heat to break within a week of forcing at 18 °C.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1091–1224 · show in text ↑
e1

“peach [ Prunus persica (L.) Batsch]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 93–128 · show in text ↑

light · phenology · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.