Paper · 2005 · Plant Nutrition and Fertilizing Science

Effects of aluminum stress on wheat root tip cytoplasmic proteins and malate efflux

Yang Jian-li; Xuehui Yu; Qiang Liu; et al.

9
claims
19
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In the present study, a pair of near iso-genic wheat line, ET8 and ES8, was used to investigate the effects of aluminum (Al) stress on root growth, root tip Al content, root tip cytoplasmic protein, and malate efflux from their roots. Root elongation was decreased with increasing Al concentrations applied, but it was always higher in ET8 than in ES8, indicating high Al tolerance in ET8. Total Al content in root tips was significantly lower in ET8 than in ES8 suggesting the role of Al exclusion mechanism in Al tolerance of ET8. After 50 #mu#mol/L Al exposure for 24 h, SDS-PAGE cytoplasmic protein profiles in root tips were severely affected in ES8 but not in ET8. Furthermore, Al-induced malate efflux was significantly higher in ET8 than in ES8, indicating that exclusion of Al from root tips is due to efflux of malate from wheat roots. Although ET8 was higher in Al tolerance than ES8, the root growth was still inhibited by 50 #mu#mol/L Al exposure for 24 h. We hypothesise that Al may inhibit root elongation apoplastically rather than cytoplasitically.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root elongation fell as aluminum concentration increased.

Treatment
Al concentrationse0
Outcome
Root elongatione0
Direction
decreasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Root elongation was decreased with increasing Al concentrations applied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 235–306 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat line, ET8 and ES8”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 47–70 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ET8 maintained higher root elongation than ES8 under aluminum exposure.

Material
ET8e0
Outcome
Root elongatione1
Direction
highere0
Comparator
ES8e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it was always higher in ET8 than in ES8, indicating high Al tolerance in ET8”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 312–388 · show in text ↑
e1

“Root elongation was decreased with increasing Al concentrations applied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 235–306 · show in text ↑
e2

“wheat line, ET8 and ES8”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 47–70 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

ET8 root tips contained significantly less aluminum than ES8 root tips.

Material
ET8e0
Organ / stage
root tipse0
Outcome
Total Al contente0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
ES8e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Total Al content in root tips was significantly lower in ET8 than in ES8”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 390–462 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat line, ET8 and ES8”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 47–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aluminum exposure severely changed ES8 root-tip cytoplasmic protein profiles.

Material
ES8e0
Organ / stage
root tipse0
Treatment
50 #mu#mol/L Al exposure for 24 he0
Outcome
SDS-PAGE cytoplasmic protein profilese0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“After 50 #mu#mol/L Al exposure for 24 h, SDS-PAGE cytoplasmic protein profiles in root tips were severely affected in ES8”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 533–654 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat line, ET8 and ES8”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 47–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same exposure did not severely change ET8 root-tip protein profiles.

Material
ET8e0
Treatment
50 #mu#mol/L Al exposure for 24 he1
Outcome
SDS-PAGE cytoplasmic protein profilese0
Direction
note0
Comparator
ES8e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SDS-PAGE cytoplasmic protein profiles in root tips were severely affected in ES8 but not in ET8”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 574–669 · show in text ↑
e1

“After 50 #mu#mol/L Al exposure for 24 h”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 533–572 · show in text ↑
e2

“wheat line, ET8 and ES8”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 47–70 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Aluminum induced significantly greater malate efflux in ET8 than ES8.

Material
ET8e0
Outcome
Al-induced malate effluxe0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
ES8e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Al-induced malate efflux was significantly higher in ET8 than in ES8”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–752 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat line, ET8 and ES8”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 47–70 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Authors interpreted malate efflux as explaining aluminum exclusion from wheat root tips.

Outcome
exclusion of Al from root tipse0
Qualifier
efflux of malate from wheat rootse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“exclusion of Al from root tips is due to efflux of malate from wheat roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 770–844 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ET8 root growth remained inhibited after 50 #mu#mol/L aluminum for 24 hours.

Material
ET8e1
Treatment
50 #mu#mol/L Al exposure for 24 he0
Outcome
root growthe0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“root growth was still inhibited by 50 #mu#mol/L Al exposure for 24 h”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 900–968 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat line, ET8 and ES8”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 47–70 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultnegativebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors hypothesized apoplastic rather than cytoplasmic inhibition of root elongation by aluminum.

Outcome
root elongatione0
Qualifier
apoplastically rather than cytoplasiticallye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Al may inhibit root elongation apoplastically rather than cytoplasitically”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 990–1064 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat line, ET8 and ES8”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 47–70 · show in text ↑

aluminium atom · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

67 papers: 13 positive, 54 negative or no effect

53 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

63 papers more in this group

See all 67 papers →

aluminium atom · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 3 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

heavy metal · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

53 papers: 8 positive, 45 negative or no effect

44 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

49 papers more in this group

See all 53 papers →

heavy metal · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.