Paper · 2015 · PLANT PHYSIOLOGY

Allelopathic Effects of Aqueous Extracts of Pugionium cornutum on Seed Germination and Seedling Growth of Cabbage

Bao Hong

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In this paper, the effects of aqueous extracts from leaves, peels and branches of Pugionium cornutum on the germination of cabbage seed, growth and physiological indexes of cabbage seedling were studied by means of bioassay in laboratory. The results showed that aquatic extracts from different parts inhibited cabbage seed germination and seedling growth, and the inhibition effect enhanced with the increase of concentration. The different concentrations of aquatic extracts from different parts decreased chlorophyll, soluble protein contents and root activity of cabbage seedling, inhibited superoxide dismutase(SOD) and peroidase(POD) activities of the cabbage seedlings, increased leaf conductivity and MDA contents. The allelopathic effect order of aqueous extracts from different parts of P. cornutum was leafpeelbranch.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Extracts from different Pugionium parts inhibited cabbage germination and seedling growth, more at higher concentrations.

Treatment
aquatic extracts from different partse0
Outcome
cabbage seed germination and seedling growthe0
Direction
inhibitede0
Qualifier
increase of concentratione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“aquatic extracts from different parts inhibited cabbage seed germination and seedling growth, and the inhibition effect enhanced with the increase of concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 263–426 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Extracts reduced cabbage seedling chlorophyll and soluble protein contents and root activity.

Treatment
aquatic extracts from different partse0
Outcome
chlorophyll, soluble protein contents and root activitye0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“aquatic extracts from different parts decreased chlorophyll, soluble protein contents and root activity of cabbage seedling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 460–583 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Extracts inhibited cabbage seedling SOD and POD activities.

Outcome
superoxide dismutase(SOD) and peroidase(POD) activitiese0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“inhibited superoxide dismutase(SOD) and peroidase(POD) activities of the cabbage seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 585–675 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Extracts increased cabbage seedling leaf conductivity and MDA content.

Outcome
leaf conductivity and MDA contentse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased leaf conductivity and MDA contents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 677–721 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–113 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Allelopathic effect was ordered leaf, peel, branch.

Outcome
allelopathic effect ordere0
Qualifier
leafpeelbranche0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The allelopathic effect order of aqueous extracts from different parts of P. cornutum was leafpeelbranch”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 723–827 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–113 · show in text ↑

botanical · physiology: pigments · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

botanical · growth · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

75 papers: 42 positive, 33 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this paper · 42 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

71 papers more in this group

See all 75 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.