Paper · 2010 · Xibei nongye xuebao

Control Effect and Economic Benefit of Different Treatments on Cucumber Root Knot Nematodes

Yang Zhaosen

20
claims
40
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Control effect and economic benefit were studied with different treatments on different disease rating of the root knot nematodes by the comparison experiment in the cucumber field.The result showed that control effects of ridge and furrow Solarization,Dazomet 98% GR,10% Fosthiazate GR,planted green vegetables,biofumigation,soil treated by CaCN2 and Solarization and graft cultivation on moderate occurrence of root knot nematodes were 100%,92.7%,73.2%,14.3%,46.2%,69.0% and 5.3%,respectively.The ratio of input and output were 1∶9.02,1∶4.55,1∶7.65,1∶2.51,1∶3.76,1∶6.05 and 1∶1.87,respectively.With the increasing of damage level,input-output ratios of the different control measures had been decreased except ridge and furrow Solarization and Dazomet 98% GR.Different treatments on the slightly and heavily occurred root knot nematodes had significant difference effect,and control effect and economic benefit of the same treatments had also significant difference on the different damage level of the root knot nematodes.Considering control effect on the root knot nematodes and higher input-output ratio,the preferring soil treatments in the slightly damage area include CaCN2 and Solarization,10% Fosthiazate GR,planted Green Vegetables and biofumigation;in the medium damage area,preferring ridge and furrow Solarization,Dazomet 98% GR,Soil treated by CaCN2 and Solarization and 10% Fosthiazate GR;in the heavily damage area,preferring ridge and furrow Solarization and Dazomet 98% GR.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ridge and furrow Solarization had 100% control effect on root knot nematodes at moderate occurrence.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
ridge and furrow Solarizatione0
Interactor
root knot nematodesMeloidogynee0pest
Outcome
control effectse0
Value
100%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne
Meloidogyne · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Photo by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“control effects of ridge and furrow Solarization,Dazomet 98% GR,10% Fosthiazate GR,planted green vegetables,biofumigation,soil treated by CaCN2 and Solarization and graft cultivation on moderate occurrence of root knot nematodes were 100%,92.7%,73.2%,14.3%,46.2%,69.0% and 5.3%,respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 204–494 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dazomet 98% GR had 92.7% control effect on root knot nematodes at moderate occurrence.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
Dazomet 98% GRe0
Interactor
root knot nematodesMeloidogynee0pest
Outcome
control effectse0
Value
92.7%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne
Meloidogyne · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Photo by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“control effects of ridge and furrow Solarization,Dazomet 98% GR,10% Fosthiazate GR,planted green vegetables,biofumigation,soil treated by CaCN2 and Solarization and graft cultivation on moderate occurrence of root knot nematodes were 100%,92.7%,73.2%,14.3%,46.2%,69.0% and 5.3%,respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 204–494 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

10% Fosthiazate GR had 73.2% control effect on root knot nematodes at moderate occurrence.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
10% Fosthiazate GRe0
Interactor
root knot nematodesMeloidogynee0pest
Outcome
control effectse0
Value
73.2%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne
Meloidogyne · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Photo by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“control effects of ridge and furrow Solarization,Dazomet 98% GR,10% Fosthiazate GR,planted green vegetables,biofumigation,soil treated by CaCN2 and Solarization and graft cultivation on moderate occurrence of root knot nematodes were 100%,92.7%,73.2%,14.3%,46.2%,69.0% and 5.3%,respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 204–494 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

planted green vegetables had 14.3% control effect on root knot nematodes at moderate occurrence.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
planted green vegetablese0
Interactor
root knot nematodesMeloidogynee0pest
Outcome
control effectse0
Value
14.3%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne
Meloidogyne · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Photo by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“control effects of ridge and furrow Solarization,Dazomet 98% GR,10% Fosthiazate GR,planted green vegetables,biofumigation,soil treated by CaCN2 and Solarization and graft cultivation on moderate occurrence of root knot nematodes were 100%,92.7%,73.2%,14.3%,46.2%,69.0% and 5.3%,respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 204–494 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

biofumigation had 46.2% control effect on root knot nematodes at moderate occurrence.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
biofumigatione0
Interactor
root knot nematodesMeloidogynee0pest
Outcome
control effectse0
Value
46.2%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne
Meloidogyne · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Photo by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“control effects of ridge and furrow Solarization,Dazomet 98% GR,10% Fosthiazate GR,planted green vegetables,biofumigation,soil treated by CaCN2 and Solarization and graft cultivation on moderate occurrence of root knot nematodes were 100%,92.7%,73.2%,14.3%,46.2%,69.0% and 5.3%,respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 204–494 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

soil treated by CaCN2 and Solarization had 69.0% control effect on root knot nematodes at moderate occurrence.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
soil treated by CaCN2 and Solarizatione0
Interactor
root knot nematodesMeloidogynee0pest
Outcome
control effectse0
Value
69.0%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne
Meloidogyne · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Photo by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“control effects of ridge and furrow Solarization,Dazomet 98% GR,10% Fosthiazate GR,planted green vegetables,biofumigation,soil treated by CaCN2 and Solarization and graft cultivation on moderate occurrence of root knot nematodes were 100%,92.7%,73.2%,14.3%,46.2%,69.0% and 5.3%,respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 204–494 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

graft cultivation had 5.3% control effect on root knot nematodes at moderate occurrence.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
graft cultivatione0
Interactor
root knot nematodesMeloidogynee0pest
Outcome
control effectse0
Value
5.3%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne
Meloidogyne · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Photo by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“control effects of ridge and furrow Solarization,Dazomet 98% GR,10% Fosthiazate GR,planted green vegetables,biofumigation,soil treated by CaCN2 and Solarization and graft cultivation on moderate occurrence of root knot nematodes were 100%,92.7%,73.2%,14.3%,46.2%,69.0% and 5.3%,respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 204–494 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–71 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ridge and furrow Solarization had an input-output ratio of 1∶9.02.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Outcome
ratio of input and outpute0
Value
1∶9.02e0

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The ratio of input and output were 1∶9.02,1∶4.55,1∶7.65,1∶2.51,1∶3.76,1∶6.05 and 1∶1.87,respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 495–595 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–71 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dazomet 98% GR had an input-output ratio of 1∶4.55.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Outcome
ratio of input and outpute0
Value
1∶4.55e0

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The ratio of input and output were 1∶9.02,1∶4.55,1∶7.65,1∶2.51,1∶3.76,1∶6.05 and 1∶1.87,respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 495–595 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–71 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

10% Fosthiazate GR had an input-output ratio of 1∶7.65.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Outcome
ratio of input and outpute0
Value
1∶7.65e0

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The ratio of input and output were 1∶9.02,1∶4.55,1∶7.65,1∶2.51,1∶3.76,1∶6.05 and 1∶1.87,respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 495–595 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–71 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

planted green vegetables had an input-output ratio of 1∶2.51.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Outcome
ratio of input and outpute0
Value
1∶2.51e0

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The ratio of input and output were 1∶9.02,1∶4.55,1∶7.65,1∶2.51,1∶3.76,1∶6.05 and 1∶1.87,respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 495–595 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–71 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

biofumigation had an input-output ratio of 1∶3.76.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Outcome
ratio of input and outpute0
Value
1∶3.76e0

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The ratio of input and output were 1∶9.02,1∶4.55,1∶7.65,1∶2.51,1∶3.76,1∶6.05 and 1∶1.87,respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 495–595 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–71 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

soil treated by CaCN2 and Solarization had an input-output ratio of 1∶6.05.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Outcome
ratio of input and outpute0
Value
1∶6.05e0

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The ratio of input and output were 1∶9.02,1∶4.55,1∶7.65,1∶2.51,1∶3.76,1∶6.05 and 1∶1.87,respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 495–595 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–71 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

graft cultivation had an input-output ratio of 1∶1.87.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Outcome
ratio of input and outpute0
Value
1∶1.87e0

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The ratio of input and output were 1∶9.02,1∶4.55,1∶7.65,1∶2.51,1∶3.76,1∶6.05 and 1∶1.87,respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 495–595 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–71 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Input-output ratios decreased with increasing nematode damage except for ridge and furrow Solarization and Dazomet 98% GR.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
different control measurese0
Outcome
input-output ratiose0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
except ridge and furrow Solarization and Dazomet 98% GRe0

Not reportedInteractor

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With the increasing of damage level,input-output ratios of the different control measures had been decreased except ridge and furrow Solarization and Dazomet 98% GR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 596–760 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–71 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment effects differed significantly between slight and heavy nematode occurrence.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Interactor
root knot nematodesMeloidogynee0pest
Outcome
significant difference effecte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne
Meloidogyne · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Photo by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Different treatments on the slightly and heavily occurred root knot nematodes had significant difference effect”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 761–872 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–71 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The same treatments differed significantly in control effect and economic benefit across nematode damage levels.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Interactor
root knot nematodesMeloidogynee0pest
Outcome
control effect and economic benefite0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne
Meloidogyne · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Photo by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“control effect and economic benefit of the same treatments had also significant difference on the different damage level of the root knot nematodes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 877–1024 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–71 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors prefer CaCN2 and Solarization,10% Fosthiazate GR,planted Green Vegetables and biofumigation in the slightly damage area.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Outcome
CaCN2 and Solarization,10% Fosthiazate GR,planted Green Vegetables and biofumigatione0
Qualifier
slightly damage areae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the preferring soil treatments in the slightly damage area include CaCN2 and Solarization,10% Fosthiazate GR,planted Green Vegetables and biofumigation;in the medium damage area,preferring ridge and furrow Solarization,Dazomet 98% GR,Soil treated by CaCN2 and Solarization and 10% Fosthiazate GR;in the heavily damage area,preferring ridge and furrow Solarization and Dazomet 98% GR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1109–1491 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–71 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors prefer ridge and furrow Solarization,Dazomet 98% GR,Soil treated by CaCN2 and Solarization and 10% Fosthiazate GR in the medium damage area.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Outcome
ridge and furrow Solarization,Dazomet 98% GR,Soil treated by CaCN2 and Solarization and 10% Fosthiazate GRe0
Qualifier
medium damage areae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the preferring soil treatments in the slightly damage area include CaCN2 and Solarization,10% Fosthiazate GR,planted Green Vegetables and biofumigation;in the medium damage area,preferring ridge and furrow Solarization,Dazomet 98% GR,Soil treated by CaCN2 and Solarization and 10% Fosthiazate GR;in the heavily damage area,preferring ridge and furrow Solarization and Dazomet 98% GR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1109–1491 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–71 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors prefer ridge and furrow Solarization and Dazomet 98% GR in the heavily damage area.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Outcome
ridge and furrow Solarization and Dazomet 98% GRe0
Qualifier
heavily damage areae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the preferring soil treatments in the slightly damage area include CaCN2 and Solarization,10% Fosthiazate GR,planted Green Vegetables and biofumigation;in the medium damage area,preferring ridge and furrow Solarization,Dazomet 98% GR,Soil treated by CaCN2 and Solarization and 10% Fosthiazate GR;in the heavily damage area,preferring ridge and furrow Solarization and Dazomet 98% GR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1109–1491 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–71 · show in text ↑

fosthiazate · Meloidogyne · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

dazomet · Meloidogyne · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

irrigation · Meloidogyne · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

solarization · Meloidogyne · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.