Paper · 2012 · Journal of Biological Control

Biological Control of Tomato Bacterial Wilt Caused by Ralstonia solanacearum with Erwinia persicinus RA2 and Bacillus pumilus WP8

Yijun Kang; Min Shen; Huanli Wang; et al.

13
claims
26
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The effect of Erwinia persicinus RA2 and Bacillus pumilus WP8 with soaking and mixing soil treatments on tomato bacterial wilt and tomato rhizosphere bacterial community were studied.The results showed that both E.persicinus RA2 and B.pumilus WP8 could effectively control tomato bacterial wilt,and promote growth of tomato seedlings.Inoculation method with the seeds soaking was more effective than soil drench.The rates of healthy stand treated by seeds soaking were 68.9% and 62.8% respectively,significantly higher when compared to control and Ralstonia solanacearum QL-Rs1115 treatment;The dry biomass of stem and leaf and root reached 4.87 mg·strain-1 and 35.69 mg·strain-1 in B.pumilus WP8 soaking treatment,which were improved by 110.82% and 205.83% compared to R.solanacearum QL-Rs1115 treatment;Also,soil aggregate stability(0.25 mm) ratio were increased 269.91% and 156.88% compared to control and R.solanacearum QL-Rs1115 treatment respectively.DGGE fingerprinting indicated that the uses of E.persicinus RA2 and B.pumilus WP8 had minimal effects on rhizosphere bacterial community.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Erwinia persicinus RA2 controlled tomato bacterial wilt.

Treatment
E.persicinus RA2e0
Interactor
Ralstonia solanacearumRalstonia solanacearume1pathogen
Second interactor
E.persicinus RA2Erwinia persicinae0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
tomato bacterial wilte0
Direction
effectively controle0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Ralstonia solanacearum
Ralstonia solanacearum · InteractorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series, Bugwood.org · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“both E.persicinus RA2 and B.pumilus WP8 could effectively control tomato bacterial wilt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 207–294 · show in text ↑
e1

“Ralstonia solanacearum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacillus pumilus WP8 controlled tomato bacterial wilt.

Treatment
B.pumilus WP8e0
Interactor
Ralstonia solanacearumRalstonia solanacearume1pathogen
Second interactor
B.pumilus WP8Bacillus pumiluse0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
tomato bacterial wilte0
Direction
effectively controle0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Ralstonia solanacearum
Ralstonia solanacearum · InteractorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series, Bugwood.org · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“both E.persicinus RA2 and B.pumilus WP8 could effectively control tomato bacterial wilt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 207–294 · show in text ↑
e1

“Ralstonia solanacearum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Erwinia persicinus RA2 promoted tomato seedling growth.

Treatment
E.persicinus RA2e0
Interactor
E.persicinus RA2Erwinia persicinae0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
growth of tomato seedlingse0
Direction
promotee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“both E.persicinus RA2 and B.pumilus WP8 could effectively control tomato bacterial wilt,and promote growth of tomato seedlings.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 207–334 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacillus pumilus WP8 promoted tomato seedling growth.

Treatment
B.pumilus WP8e0
Interactor
B.pumilus WP8Bacillus pumiluse0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
growth of tomato seedlingse0
Direction
promotee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“both E.persicinus RA2 and B.pumilus WP8 could effectively control tomato bacterial wilt,and promote growth of tomato seedlings.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 207–334 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed soaking was more effective than soil drench.

Treatment
seeds soakinge0
Outcome
more effectivee0
Direction
more effectivee0
Comparator
soil drenche0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–28 · show in text ↑
e0

“Inoculation method with the seeds soaking was more effective than soil drench.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 334–412 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Healthy stand rate after RA2 seed soaking was 68.9%, significantly above control and pathogen treatment.

Treatment
Erwinia persicinus RA2t0
Interactor
Ralstonia solanacearumRalstonia solanacearumt0pathogen
Second interactor
Erwinia persicinus RA2Erwinia persicinat0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
rates of healthy stande0
Direction
highere0
Value
68.9%e0
Comparator
control and Ralstonia solanacearum QL-Rs1115 treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Ralstonia solanacearum
Ralstonia solanacearum · InteractorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series, Bugwood.org · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato Bacterial Wilt Caused by Ralstonia solanacearum with Erwinia persicinus RA2 and Bacillus pumilus WP8”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–129 · show in text ↑
e0

“The rates of healthy stand treated by seeds soaking were 68.9% and 62.8% respectively,significantly higher when compared to control and Ralstonia solanacearum QL-Rs1115 treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 412–590 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Healthy stand rate after WP8 seed soaking was 62.8%, significantly above control and pathogen treatment.

Treatment
Bacillus pumilus WP8t0
Interactor
Ralstonia solanacearumRalstonia solanacearumt0pathogen
Second interactor
Bacillus pumilus WP8Bacillus pumilust0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
rates of healthy stande0
Direction
highere0
Value
62.8%e0
Comparator
control and Ralstonia solanacearum QL-Rs1115 treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Ralstonia solanacearum
Ralstonia solanacearum · InteractorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series, Bugwood.org · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato Bacterial Wilt Caused by Ralstonia solanacearum with Erwinia persicinus RA2 and Bacillus pumilus WP8”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–129 · show in text ↑
e0

“The rates of healthy stand treated by seeds soaking were 68.9% and 62.8% respectively,significantly higher when compared to control and Ralstonia solanacearum QL-Rs1115 treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 412–590 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

WP8 seed soaking raised stem and leaf dry biomass to 4.87 mg·strain-1, 110.82% above pathogen treatment.

Treatment
B.pumilus WP8 soaking treatmente0
Interactor
B.pumilus WP8Bacillus pumiluse0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
dry biomass of stem and leafe0
Direction
improvede0
Value
4.87 mg·strain-1e0
Qualifier
110.82%e0
Comparator
R.solanacearum QL-Rs1115 treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–28 · show in text ↑
e0

“The dry biomass of stem and leaf and root reached 4.87 mg·strain-1 and 35.69 mg·strain-1 in B.pumilus WP8 soaking treatment,which were improved by 110.82% and 205.83% compared to R.solanacearum QL-Rs1115 treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 591–804 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

WP8 seed soaking raised root dry biomass to 35.69 mg·strain-1, 205.83% above pathogen treatment.

Treatment
B.pumilus WP8 soaking treatmente0
Interactor
B.pumilus WP8Bacillus pumiluse0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
roote0
Direction
improvede0
Value
35.69 mg·strain-1e0
Qualifier
205.83%e0
Comparator
R.solanacearum QL-Rs1115 treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–28 · show in text ↑
e0

“The dry biomass of stem and leaf and root reached 4.87 mg·strain-1 and 35.69 mg·strain-1 in B.pumilus WP8 soaking treatment,which were improved by 110.82% and 205.83% compared to R.solanacearum QL-Rs1115 treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 591–804 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil aggregate stability ratio rose 269.91% relative to control.

Treatment
B.pumilus WP8 soaking treatmente1
Outcome
soil aggregate stability(0.25 mm) ratioe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
269.91%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–28 · show in text ↑
e0

“soil aggregate stability(0.25 mm) ratio were increased 269.91% and 156.88% compared to control and R.solanacearum QL-Rs1115 treatment respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 810–956 · show in text ↑
e1

“B.pumilus WP8 soaking treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 683–714 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil aggregate stability ratio rose 156.88% relative to pathogen treatment.

Treatment
B.pumilus WP8 soaking treatmente1
Outcome
soil aggregate stability(0.25 mm) ratioe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
156.88%e0
Comparator
R.solanacearum QL-Rs1115 treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–28 · show in text ↑
e0

“soil aggregate stability(0.25 mm) ratio were increased 269.91% and 156.88% compared to control and R.solanacearum QL-Rs1115 treatment respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 810–956 · show in text ↑
e1

“B.pumilus WP8 soaking treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 683–714 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RA2 use had minimal effects on the rhizosphere bacterial community.

Treatment
E.persicinus RA2e0
Interactor
E.persicinus RA2Erwinia persicinae0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
rhizosphere bacterial communitye0
Direction
minimal effectse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–28 · show in text ↑
e0

“DGGE fingerprinting indicated that the uses of E.persicinus RA2 and B.pumilus WP8 had minimal effects on rhizosphere bacterial community.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 957–1094 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

WP8 use had minimal effects on the rhizosphere bacterial community.

Treatment
B.pumilus WP8e0
Interactor
B.pumilus WP8Bacillus pumiluse0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
rhizosphere bacterial communitye0
Direction
minimal effectse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–28 · show in text ↑
e0

“DGGE fingerprinting indicated that the uses of E.persicinus RA2 and B.pumilus WP8 had minimal effects on rhizosphere bacterial community.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 957–1094 · show in text ↑

Erwinia persicina · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Bacillus pumilus · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Bacillus pumilus · Ralstonia solanacearum · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

application · soil: physics · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

application · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

253 papers: 225 positive, 28 negative or no effect

224 papers in the same direction as this paper · 26 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

249 papers more in this group

See all 253 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.