Paper · 2009 · Nongyaoxue xuebao

Systemic Distribution of Imidacloprid in Tomato Crop and its Control Effect against Bemisia tabaci with Foliar Spraying or Root Pouring

Luo Wan-chun

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Systemic distribution of imidacloprid in tomato crop and its control-effect against whiteflies,Bemisia tabaci,were examined with different applications,namely foliar spraying and root pouring,respectively.The results showed that the decline rate of imidacloprid reached 56.1% 2 d after spraying and about 90% 10 d after treatment.However,the residues of imidacloprid in the tomato stem was stable with root pouring method within 2~21 d.The control effect by spraying was better than that by root pouring method in short term(within 7 d) with shorter persistent period.It′s found that the control effect by root pouring to whiteflies was kept above 65% from 7 d to 21 d after treated.The result of simulated rain washing foliar experiment showed that the washed ratio always remained about 70%,It indicated that no or little imidacloprid was entered into leaves.Consequently,the effect of foliar spraying to whiteflies Bemisia tabaci was worse than that of root pouring,although the residues of foliar spraying was a little higher than that of root pouring.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imidacloprid decline rate in tomato reached 56.1% 2 d after spraying

Treatment
imidaclopride1
Outcome
decline rate of imidaclopride1
Value
56.1%e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“decline rate of imidacloprid reached 56.1% 2 d after spraying”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 233–294 · show in text ↑
e2

“Systemic distribution of imidacloprid in tomato crop and its control-effect against whiteflies,Bemisia tabaci”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–109 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imidacloprid decline rate in tomato reached about 90% 10 d after treatment

Treatment
imidaclopride3
Outcome
decline rate of imidaclopride3
Value
about 90%e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“the decline rate of imidacloprid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 229–261 · show in text ↑
e4

“about 90% 10 d after treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 299–329 · show in text ↑
e2

“Systemic distribution of imidacloprid in tomato crop and its control-effect against whiteflies,Bemisia tabaci”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–109 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imidacloprid residues in tomato stem stayed stable with root pouring within 2-21 d

Treatment
root pouring methode1
Outcome
residues of imidacloprid in the tomato steme1
Qualifier
within 2~21 de1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the residues of imidacloprid in the tomato stem was stable with root pouring method within 2~21 d”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 338–435 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spraying gave better control of whiteflies than root pouring in the short term

Treatment
sprayinge1
Interactor
Bemisia tabaciBemisia tabacie2pest
Outcome
control effecte1
Direction
bettere1
Comparator
root pouring methode1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bemisia tabaci
Bemisia tabaci · InteractorPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The control effect by spraying was better than that by root pouring method”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 436–510 · show in text ↑
e2

“Systemic distribution of imidacloprid in tomato crop and its control-effect against whiteflies,Bemisia tabaci”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–109 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root pouring kept control of whiteflies above 65% from 7 to 21 d after treatment

Treatment
root pouringe1
Interactor
whitefliesAleyrodoideae1pest
Outcome
control effecte1
Value
above 65%e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the control effect by root pouring to whiteflies was kept above 65% from 7 d to 21 d after treated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 584–682 · show in text ↑
e2

“Systemic distribution of imidacloprid in tomato crop and its control-effect against whiteflies,Bemisia tabaci”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–109 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In simulated rain washing of foliar-sprayed tomato, about 70% of imidacloprid was washed off

Treatment
simulated rain washing foliare1
Outcome
washed ratioe1
Value
about 70%e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“simulated rain washing foliar experiment showed that the washed ratio always remained about 70%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 697–792 · show in text ↑
e2

“Systemic distribution of imidacloprid in tomato crop and its control-effect against whiteflies,Bemisia tabaci”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–109 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Little or no imidacloprid entered the leaves

Outcome
imidacloprid was entered into leavese1
Qualifier
no or littlee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“It indicated that no or little imidacloprid was entered into leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 793–860 · show in text ↑
e2

“Systemic distribution of imidacloprid in tomato crop and its control-effect against whiteflies,Bemisia tabaci”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–109 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar spraying gave worse control of whiteflies than root pouring

Treatment
foliar sprayinge1
Interactor
Bemisia tabaciBemisia tabacie1pest
Outcome
effect of foliar spraying to whiteflies Bemisia tabacie1
Direction
worsee1
Comparator
root pouringe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bemisia tabaci
Bemisia tabaci · InteractorPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the effect of foliar spraying to whiteflies Bemisia tabaci was worse than that of root pouring”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 874–968 · show in text ↑
e2

“Systemic distribution of imidacloprid in tomato crop and its control-effect against whiteflies,Bemisia tabaci”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–109 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imidacloprid residues after foliar spraying were slightly higher than after root pouring

Treatment
foliar sprayinge1
Outcome
residuese1
Direction
highere1
Qualifier
a littlee1
Comparator
root pouringe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the residues of foliar spraying was a little higher than that of root pouring”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 978–1055 · show in text ↑
e2

“Systemic distribution of imidacloprid in tomato crop and its control-effect against whiteflies,Bemisia tabaci”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–109 · show in text ↑

application · Bemisia tabaci · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 10 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.