Abstract
[Objective] The aim was to study the control effects of the complex formulation of thifluzamide and tebuconazole on rice sheath blight.[Method] The toxicity of the complex formulation of thifluzamide and tebuconazole on Rhizoctonia solani was determined by mycelial growth method and the field trials were performed.[Result]The results showed that the EC50 for thifluzamide and tebuconazole in inhibiting mycelial growth of R.solani were 0.139 3 and 0.135 6 μg/ml,respectively.The toxicities of these reagents were similar.The synergistic factors ranged from 0.8283 to 2.535 0,indicating obvious synergistic effect.The field trials showed that 225-375 g/hm2 complex formulation provided 88.04%-97.61% control efficacy based on the synergistic factors,higher than that of the single reagent.[Conclusion] The complex formulation of thifluzamide and tebuconazole with 5∶1 had good control effects on rice sheath blight.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
The EC50 values of thifluzamide and tebuconazole for inhibiting mycelial growth of R. solani were 0.1393 and 0.1356 μg/ml.
- Taxon
- Rice
Oryza sativat0 - Treatment
- thifluzamide and tebuconazolee1
- Interactor
- R.solani
Rhizoctonia solanie1pathogen - Outcome
- mycelial growthe1
- Value
- 0.139 3 and 0.135 6 μg/mle1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Rice Sheath Blight”
e1“The results showed that the EC50 for thifluzamide and tebuconazole in inhibiting mycelial growth of R.solani were 0.139 3 and 0.135 6 μg/ml,respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Thifluzamide and tebuconazole had similar toxicity to R. solani mycelial growth.
- Taxon
- RiceOryza sativat0
- Treatment
- thifluzamidee1
- Interactor
- R.solaniRhizoctonia solanie1pathogen
- Outcome
- toxicitiese2
- Direction
- similare2
- Comparator
- tebuconazolee1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Rice Sheath Blight”
e1“The results showed that the EC50 for thifluzamide and tebuconazole in inhibiting mycelial growth of R.solani were 0.139 3 and 0.135 6 μg/ml,respectively”
e2“The toxicities of these reagents were similar”
Claim · model-written summary
The synergistic factors of the complex formulation ranged from 0.8283 to 2.5350, indicating an obvious synergistic effect.
- Taxon
- RiceOryza sativat0
- Outcome
- synergistic factorse3
- Value
- 0.8283 to 2.535 0e3
- Qualifier
- obvious synergistic effecte3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Rice Sheath Blight”
e3“The synergistic factors ranged from 0.8283 to 2.535 0,indicating obvious synergistic effect”
Claim · model-written summary
In field trials, 225-375 g/hm2 of the complex formulation gave 88.04%-97.61% control efficacy, higher than the single reagent.
- Taxon
- RiceOryza sativat0
- Treatment
- 225-375 g/hm2 complex formulatione4
- Outcome
- control efficacye4
- Direction
- highere4
- Value
- 88.04%-97.61%e4
- Qualifier
- based on the synergistic factorse4
- Comparator
- single reagente4
- Setting
- field trialse4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Rice Sheath Blight”
e4“The field trials showed that 225-375 g/hm2 complex formulation provided 88.04%-97.61% control efficacy based on the synergistic factors,higher than that of the single reagent”
The same questions in other papers
thifluzamide · Rhizoctonia solani · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
6 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.